02-09-2008, 06:02 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
News: Washington state may introduce annual MPG-based car taxes
Via ABG: Washington state may introduce MPG-based car taxes
Quote:
Senate Bill 6923 would impose a vehicle excise tax on all passenger vehicles based on EPA ratings of a cars' fuel efficiency. For example, the owner of a hybrid car such as, say, a Toyota Prius, would pay $60 in annual taxes, whereas the owner of a Hummer H3 would pay $180 a year.
...
The tax would replace slumping revenue collected through the state's gas tax. Rising fuel costs have lured drivers from their cars while the increased popularity of gas-efficient vehicles has cut back on the number of trips drivers make to the pumps.
|
Is it really true that this tax will hurt lower income people more, as some argue, because they can't afford to buy newer cars that get better mileage? Seems to me there are more older cars that get better mileage than the latest crop of cars.
More: Seattle Post Intelligencer
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-09-2008, 06:25 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
"The tax would replace slumping revenue collected through the state's gas tax. Rising fuel costs have lured drivers from their cars while the increased popularity of gas-efficient vehicles has cut back on the number of trips drivers make to the pumps."
Slumping revenue... can that be true? More miles driven, more drivers, more SUVs, more vehicles, and because a couple of them are hybrids they say the revenue is slumping?!?
|
|
|
02-09-2008, 08:26 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
ECO-Evolution
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,482
Thanks: 17
Thanked 45 Times in 34 Posts
|
Yea I agree demand is higher than ever. Here's a look.
Quote:
The EIA 2007 data shows the recent trend (graph, below left). Soaring gasoline prices have not been able to keep year-on-year demand flat, let alone decrease it. Economists define the price elasticity of demand (PE), which measures demand responses to changes in price.
|
__________________
"Judge a person by their questions rather than their answers."
|
|
|
02-09-2008, 09:13 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
I've not found more current data yet, but MN used 400,000,000 more gallons of gas in '97 than '87 (from 1,900,000,000 gallons to 2,300,000,000 gallons )! P.S. 2,700,000,000 gallons in '04. Still looking.
"The gas guzzling reflects the fact that more people are driving, that nearly everyone is driving more miles and that motorists are buying bigger cars with lower gas mileage." http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-62578944.html
And MN was 18th in the U.S. in gas consumption. I have no reason to believe there's been a reversal in that trend, much less a slowdown.
Last edited by Frank Lee; 02-09-2008 at 09:33 PM..
|
|
|
02-09-2008, 09:18 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Dartmouth 2010
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447
Thanks: 92
Thanked 122 Times in 90 Posts
|
Find some numbers for 2007 and we'll see,
Besides, it may be dropping per capita. It's especially an issue when building roads if people are driving more and paying less taxes to do it, *shrug*
|
|
|
02-09-2008, 09:22 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Still looking...
MN performs poorly in the "per capita" rankings as well...
|
|
|
02-09-2008, 10:01 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 405
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
If they are basing this new tax off of how far you drive and your EPA rating, then why not just raise gas taxes more? Requires less overhead in checking people's odometers and taxes the people actually wasting the most fuel the most.
|
|
|
02-09-2008, 10:58 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
MechE
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,151
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 18 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenKreton
If they are basing this new tax off of how far you drive and your EPA rating, then why not just raise gas taxes more? Requires less overhead in checking people's odometers and taxes the people actually wasting the most fuel the most.
|
Just playing devil's advocate.... Tourism?
__________________
Cars have not created a new problem. They merely made more urgent the necessity to solve existing ones.
|
|
|
02-10-2008, 02:47 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
|
GenKreton -
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenKreton
If they are basing this new tax off of how far you drive and your EPA rating, then why not just raise gas taxes more? Requires less overhead in checking people's odometers and taxes the people actually wasting the most fuel the most.
|
Hrmmmmm. Don't know. If the gas in one state is demonstrably more than another state, maybe people would stock up on gas from neighboring states? Like crossing the border for booze.
CarloSW2
|
|
|
02-10-2008, 05:07 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Norfolk, Va. USA
Posts: 869
Thanks: 14
Thanked 33 Times in 28 Posts
|
border crossing
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfg83
GenKreton -
Hrmmmmm. Don't know. If the gas in one state is demonstrably more than another state, maybe people would stock up on gas from neighboring states? Like crossing the border for booze.
CarloSW2
|
They cross for cigarettes, booze,why not for gas? Then the lower tax state will raise its taxes,(not as much) to gain higher revenue. It would trickle over till one state got greedy then maybe all would go up evenly.
Just a thought.
S.
__________________
When you are courting a nice girl an hour seems like a second. When you sit on a red-hot cinder a second seems like an hour. That's relativity.
Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|