Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-20-2009, 02:48 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Briggsdale, Colorado
Posts: 296

Wildfire - '96 Ford Bronco XL
90 day: 14.88 mpg (US)

Blackford - '96 Ford Bronco XLT
90 day: 20.26 mpg (US)

Y2k - '00 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
Team Honda
90 day: 73.98 mpg (US)

Redford V10 - '01 Ford F250 Lariat
90 day: 15.64 mpg (US)

FireFly - '00 Honda Insight DX
90 day: 69.43 mpg (US)

LittleRed - '00 Honda Insight
Thanks: 3
Thanked 31 Times in 14 Posts
Non-alcohol gasoline = better FE.

If you can find it, get it. Unofficially it can get you roughly 10% better fuel economy. Subject to GREAT argument, of course.




__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-20-2009, 03:19 PM   #2 (permalink)
In Lean Burn Mode
 
pgfpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,543

MisFit Talon - '91 Eagle Talon TSi
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 63.95 mpg (US)

Warlock - '71 Chevy Camaro

Fe Eclipse - '97 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS
Thanks: 1,301
Thanked 597 Times in 386 Posts
Man I wish I knew if this was true.

I recently had my personal best tank but I made a ton more changes so I'm not to sure if it was the non-ethanol fuel or my other changes that gave me a 4.49mpg increase.
__________________
Pressure Gradient Force
The Positive Side of the Number Line

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 03:47 PM   #3 (permalink)
dcb
needs more cowbell
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038

pimp mobile - '81 suzuki gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)

schnitzel - '01 Volkswagen Golf TDI
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
Using higher density fuel doesn't really constitute better "FE" (or a "mod"), you are not changing the number of btus used, just the volume. Not a fan of ethanol, just saying.
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 03:48 PM   #4 (permalink)
herp derp Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049

Saturn-sold - '99 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 28.28 mpg (US)

Yukon - '03 GMC Yukon Denali
90 day: 13.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
there are multiple older threads about this...

where do you get 10% difference in fuel economy? if the fuel is 10% alcohol you dont lose 10%, the alcohol still contributes. i believe 10% alcohol fuel has about 3% less BTU, but the idea that it correlates directly to mileage has been debated. some even claim better mileage with 10% alcohol.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 04:31 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Briggsdale, Colorado
Posts: 296

Wildfire - '96 Ford Bronco XL
90 day: 14.88 mpg (US)

Blackford - '96 Ford Bronco XLT
90 day: 20.26 mpg (US)

Y2k - '00 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
Team Honda
90 day: 73.98 mpg (US)

Redford V10 - '01 Ford F250 Lariat
90 day: 15.64 mpg (US)

FireFly - '00 Honda Insight DX
90 day: 69.43 mpg (US)

LittleRed - '00 Honda Insight
Thanks: 3
Thanked 31 Times in 14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2000mc View Post
there are multiple older threads about this...

where do you get 10% difference in fuel economy? if the fuel is 10% alcohol you dont lose 10%, the alcohol still contributes. i believe 10% alcohol fuel has about 3% less BTU, but the idea that it correlates directly to mileage has been debated. some even claim better mileage with 10% alcohol.
10% difference = real world results. Not just my results. I'm pretty sure I mentioned nothing about linearity between the percent of alcohol and fuel mileage gain. Sorry if my first post implied this.

Any time you add methanol or ethanol, you are reducing BTUs even comparing same octane fuels.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 05:46 PM   #6 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 26.69 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
I support that 10%....

When I use 10% mix gas i get about 10% less mileage...sounds kinda weird but true...just try it.
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 06:37 PM   #7 (permalink)
A madman
 
brucey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WV
Posts: 1,018

Pequod - '17 Subaru Outback
90 day: 22.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 73
Thanked 183 Times in 98 Posts
Send a message via AIM to brucey
When road tripping last month I actually got my best mileage running E10. We made no effort to conserve gas and still averaged around 27 the entire trip. With the E10 tanks it was 29 and 28.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 06:43 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,123

The Geo - '93 Geo Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 45.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 30
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
*did not read thread*

You should not lose 10% economy with E10. Somewhere around 5% is normal though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 06:57 PM   #9 (permalink)
Driving the TurboWeasel
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Steuben County, NY
Posts: 459
Thanks: 14
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
I too notice a 10% drop in fuel economy using ethanol fuel. I believe it's something with the 3800 engine and programming, as other folks with the same engine/transmission combination notice a similar drop in economy when running E10.

Now a more modern car designed/programmed for ethanol in the gas might do better on E10 than my couch.
__________________
2012 Chevrolet Cruze Eco 6MT
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 07:08 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,123

The Geo - '93 Geo Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 45.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 30
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 99LeCouch View Post
I too notice a 10% drop in fuel economy using ethanol fuel. I believe it's something with the 3800 engine and programming, as other folks with the same engine/transmission combination notice a similar drop in economy when running E10.

Now a more modern car designed/programmed for ethanol in the gas might do better on E10 than my couch.
My dad has an Impala with the 3800. I'll have to get him to run 100% gas in it.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Methanol in gasoline Funny EcoModding Central 26 06-12-2012 03:24 AM
Driving the Scanguage for FE Harry6 Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 12 04-02-2010 01:51 PM
Gasoline expected to remain cheap this summer Frank Lee The Lounge 0 04-14-2009 04:43 PM
As I Had Thought Big Dave General Efficiency Discussion 54 09-03-2008 12:00 AM
Basic EcoDriving Techniques and Instrumentation SVOboy Instrumentation 2 11-17-2007 12:38 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com