Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Fossil Fuel Free
Register Now
 Register Now

Reply  Post New Thread
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-27-2008, 11:43 PM   #1 (permalink)
Future EV Owner
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sussex Wisconsin
Posts: 674

Wannabe - '05 Honda Civic LX
90 day: 40.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Nuclear-Powered Aircraft

I thought I'd post on something that can't possibly be controversial. I'm a proponent of nuclear-powered aircraft. (I will now run and hide.)

FOXNews.com - U.K. Government Pushes for Nuclear-Powered Aircraft - Science News | Science & Technology | Technology News


Last edited by Arminius; 10-28-2008 at 12:23 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

Old 10-28-2008, 12:24 AM   #2 (permalink)
Hydrogen Nut
Ptero's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 151

Smart Car ForTwo Pure - '08 Smart Fortwo Pure stripped
90 day: 51.35 mpg (US)

BMW 750iL V12 - '90 BMW V12
90 day: 26.4 mpg (US)

Wildfire 250C - '08 Shandong Pioneer 250C
Thanks: 2
Thanked 33 Times in 22 Posts

Project Pluto

Needed: Passengers past child-bearing age.

Last edited by Ptero; 10-28-2008 at 12:41 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 12:48 AM   #3 (permalink)
captainslug's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sterling, VA
Posts: 383

BORK! - '89 Volvo 240 DL Wagon
90 day: 21.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 24 Times in 13 Posts
They'll probably end up with a reactor similar to the one Toshiba will be making as power grid supplements in densely populated areas.
Toshiba Builds 100x Smaller Micro Nuclear Reactor

Compact, efficient, and self-regulating.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 01:56 AM   #4 (permalink)
ConnClark's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 967

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 227 Times in 156 Posts
Back when the US was looking at developing a nuclear powered bomber the big problem was shielding the crew from the reactor. Any thying that would block the radiation was dense and heavy. Recently a major breakthrough has been made in blocking radiation with a lightweight material. Its called Demron Demron - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia .

With this new material it will be possible to overcome the insurmountable problems that plagued the nuclear powered bomber program.

At the time there were two basic engine operating principals: the direct cycle and the indirect cycle.

The direct cycle used the nuclear fuel to heat the air in the jet engine directly. This engine is very light and efficient. Unfortunately it spews radio active particles out the exhaust.

The indirect cycle uses a closed loop system that uses an intermediate transport medium to conduct heat from the radio active fuel to the turbine engine section to heat the air. This system is heavier and less efficient than the direct cycle. It does however contain all nuclear particles within the engine.

One of the things that made the nuclear powered bomber ineffective was the weight of a indirect cycle engine and the shielding to protect the crew. With the improved shielding material Demron it will be possible to build a lighter indirect engine as well as lighter shielding to protect the crew.

At the time of the nuclear powered bomber program the only viable flying design would have had to use direct cycle engines that would have also had to be operated continuously even while on the ground to keep the nuclear fuel from melting down. This would not only have been a hazard to all of the areas the plane flew over but would have nuked the ground crew and made the airforce base uninhabitable.

Comparisons to project pluto are not valid as part of project pluto's weapons potential was the fact that its engine did emit fallout. In fact after all of its warheads were dropped it was planned to fly the missile back and forth over enemy territory until the nuclear fuel was exhausted. This was a one time use weapon that had a limited amount of time in the air in comparison to a fully operational aircraft.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why We Have No Wind or Solar Power SuperTrooper General Efficiency Discussion 220 07-20-2011 10:37 PM
nuclear plants groar The Lounge 76 06-19-2009 04:06 PM
Nuclear Power ... trikkonceptz Fossil Fuel Free 13 06-16-2008 07:51 PM
Solar powered clothes dryer NeilBlanchard Saving@Home 4 05-27-2008 09:16 AM
Future Nuclear Engineer here. Izzyp Introductions 7 04-02-2008 09:49 PM

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com