11-20-2013, 06:07 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 506
Woody - '90 Mercury Grand Marquis Wagon LS Last 3: 19.57 mpg (US) Brick - '99 Chevrolet K2500 Suburban LS Last 3: 12.94 mpg (US) M. C. - '01 Chevrolet Impala Base 90 day: 18.73 mpg (US) R. J. - '05 Ford Explorer 4wd 90 day: 16.66 mpg (US)
Thanks: 936
Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts
|
On/Off switch for two cylinders in van engine?
How would I convert the engine in my Father's 3.0 Litre 6 Cylinder Caravan to run on four cylinders instead of six? I had this idea as my Grandfather had a truck which could go from eight to six cylinders though I don't know much else about it.
__________________
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 06:32 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
You've been here a while; search cylinder deactivation.
Basically, it isn't going to happen.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-20-2013, 08:15 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,695 Times in 1,513 Posts
|
Maybe a 2.5L 4-pot to replace the current 3.0L V6 could be a good option, since it would benefit from lesser internal friction (thus improving efficiency) than deactivating 2 cylinders which would still generate some drag for the other 4 cylinders to overcome.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to cRiPpLe_rOoStEr For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-28-2013, 08:17 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 506
Woody - '90 Mercury Grand Marquis Wagon LS Last 3: 19.57 mpg (US) Brick - '99 Chevrolet K2500 Suburban LS Last 3: 12.94 mpg (US) M. C. - '01 Chevrolet Impala Base 90 day: 18.73 mpg (US) R. J. - '05 Ford Explorer 4wd 90 day: 16.66 mpg (US)
Thanks: 936
Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts
|
I could do that (Replace the engine with a 2.4 Litre model) but might wait, And end up with a 2002 2.4 Litre model instead; Those get higher FE than the 2000 models according to Automobile-Catalog.com:
2000 2.4 Litre (Average Range of 407 Miles estimate, 12 miles higher than the 3 Litre estimate - And I've seen 28.56 MPG or so on a 359ish mile tank)
2000 Dodge Caravan 2.4L fuel economy review (model for North America U.S.)
2002 2.4 Litre (Average range of 440 Miles estimate)
http://www.automobile-catalog.com/ec...n_ec_2_4l.html
I'm already capable of managing 24 MPG in the 2000 3-Litre; 26 is easy in a 2002 2.4 Litre with the ways and places I drive with what mods I have (Mostly without city/town miles lately.) Plus some mods and? I'm already sitting on 30.
__________________
|
|
|
11-29-2013, 02:59 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,695 Times in 1,513 Posts
|
That would be better. BTW have you never considered a Diesel engine swap for the van? I have once seen a Caravan with Argentinian plates and the Euro-spec 2.5L VM Motori turbodiesel...
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to cRiPpLe_rOoStEr For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-29-2013, 12:35 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 506
Woody - '90 Mercury Grand Marquis Wagon LS Last 3: 19.57 mpg (US) Brick - '99 Chevrolet K2500 Suburban LS Last 3: 12.94 mpg (US) M. C. - '01 Chevrolet Impala Base 90 day: 18.73 mpg (US) R. J. - '05 Ford Explorer 4wd 90 day: 16.66 mpg (US)
Thanks: 936
Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts
|
Wow, No I had not but now I'm thinking of it! That would up the MPGs considerably high, Particularly keeping Diesel Dave's White Whale in mind. I'd actually like to do that.
Oh and BTW, The fifth generation caravans all get lower MPGs than the 2002 model (I didn't even see a 2.4 litre fifth-generation model, is there one?) despite being more aerodynamic, According to Automobile-Catalog.
__________________
|
|
|
11-29-2013, 04:35 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Eco-ventor
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,645
Thanks: 76
Thanked 709 Times in 450 Posts
|
Some year models came with a manual, that would let you shut off all six cylinders.
__________________
2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
|
|
|
11-30-2013, 09:50 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,695 Times in 1,513 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev
Some year models came with a manual, that would let you shut off all six cylinders.
|
But it might be harder to find one in America than in Europe.
|
|
|
12-01-2013, 12:10 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
|
If I'm not mistaken, the 5 spd caravan was only available with the 4cyl and only in early models, around '93-'95 maybe?
__________________
|
|
|
12-01-2013, 02:42 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,695 Times in 1,513 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ksa8907
If I'm not mistaken, the 5 spd caravan was only available with the 4cyl and only in early models, around '93-'95 maybe?
|
Not sure if exclusive to European versions assembled at Magna Steyr, but after that there were still some with manual transmission.
|
|
|
|