06-24-2013, 03:02 PM
|
#41 (permalink)
|
Cyborg ECU
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,174 Times in 1,470 Posts
|
Cargo capacity
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian
The Fit basically is the new Civic Wagon, circa 1990. ...
20.6 - 21.5 - cargo capacity (cu ft) ...
|
Odd that the Fit has less Cargo capacity given how similar it is otherwise and how much Honda touted their class leading cargo area for the vehicle. Or maybe its a measure of the accomplishment, since the Wagon was a wagon and had little in the way of modern safety gear. ... Random thought...
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
06-24-2013, 04:24 PM
|
#42 (permalink)
|
Master EcoWalker
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 4,000
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,247 Times in 1,455 Posts
|
... but in the Civic Wagon there is no way to put 2 weekend bags under the rear bench, like you can in the Fit; even in the Fit Hybrid.
If Honda had given me a better deal on the Fit I would not have bought the Insight. Which is basically a flattened Fit Hybrid with a long butt and a nice cargo space.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gigameter or 0.13 Megamile.
For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
|
|
|
06-24-2013, 04:48 PM
|
#43 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
Last time I was at the dealer for service (still in warranty, won't be back after it's out), I sat in the Fits and Insights they had for sale. The insight has nicer seats.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
06-24-2013, 05:28 PM
|
#44 (permalink)
|
Master EcoWalker
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 4,000
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,247 Times in 1,455 Posts
|
The Fit (hybrid) felt sportier than the Insight, is way more accessible and has better visibility in the rear. And I love the panoramic roof. If I had to replace the Insight it would be top of the list.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gigameter or 0.13 Megamile.
For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
|
|
|
06-24-2013, 05:47 PM
|
#45 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
Ah, looked at your location. The Fit hybrid is a unicorn on this side of the pond.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
07-13-2013, 10:32 PM
|
#46 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 838
Thanks: 1,380
Thanked 209 Times in 155 Posts
|
Slick car. I like at it as an option down the road
|
|
|
01-20-2014, 11:37 AM
|
#47 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
Truck duty. Hard to see, but there are 3x 50lb feed sacks under the hay. Seat is up with full 5-passenger capacity intact.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PaleMelanesian For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-20-2014, 11:43 AM
|
#48 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
Another upgrade. There's a big open hole that needs help. The platform-mate CRZ has a cover panel here. The gap is about 20" wide by 26 long.
I had a sheet of (abs?) plastic available from a crate label. Cut to size with snips, zip ties to attach.
Crossbar from a shelving unit - 1/2" square u-channel steel with slots all along it. Zip-tied in place using existing holes in the side panels.
Panel installed. Much better!
Back end is tucked under the existing panels. It only touches the frame crossbar, engine mount, my added crossbar, and the front cover panel. Nothing hot is within 2 inches of it.
Detail of front attachment point.
The front end is tucked in behind a 1" step up in the splash panel, which is behind the 1.5" front air dam. Minimal risk of catching air. I have 3 zip ties holding it in along the front edge and the rest is just tucked in place. It's solid.
I think the car is slightly quieter, but it may be placebo. I got a near-record trip this morning, which may or not be related.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to PaleMelanesian For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-20-2014, 12:19 PM
|
#49 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
Looks good Pale. Nice job.
|
|
|
01-20-2014, 02:01 PM
|
#50 (permalink)
|
Cyborg ECU
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,174 Times in 1,470 Posts
|
very nice (both posts). This car was a smart buy.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.
|
|
|
|