08-23-2022, 09:54 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
-----------------
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Romania
Posts: 128
Thanks: 23
Thanked 57 Times in 44 Posts
|
Porsche 911 GT3 RS
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to IRONICK For This Useful Post:
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2022, 01:09 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,306
Thanks: 24,436
Thanked 7,384 Times in 4,782 Posts
|
PORSCHE
The red-headed stepchild of the ecomodding community.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
|
|
08-28-2022, 07:15 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 568
Thanks: 1
Thanked 73 Times in 58 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
The red-headed stepchild of the ecomodding community.
|
Speaking of which, I'm considering mods on my Porsche 944 Turbo, which left the factory in the mid-'80s with a drag coefficient of 0.29. With an undertray, aero mirrors, aero cleanup of the nose with proper venting of the intercooler, air curtains, cold air intake, and maybe rear diffuser strakes, could be lowered to, say, 0.25. |
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Otto For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-28-2022, 07:32 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,690
Thanks: 8,143
Thanked 8,923 Times in 7,366 Posts
|
Is it red? 
It sounds like a reasonable goal. I don't see a mention of M oon disks or wheel spats.
I was reading about the slant-four on Wikipedia and they have this picture:
The box cavity without the extra wide body width would give a Fschenfeld tearing edge.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-29-2022, 03:30 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
|
That was not done for aerodynamic purposes. That was done because the wheels had to be covered by the fenders, and they wanted to put wider wheels and tires on the car. So they could take corners faster.
Remember that almost any race car would gladly give up a few tenths Cd in order to gain a 10% greater cornering speed.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to some_other_dave For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-29-2022, 01:37 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,690
Thanks: 8,143
Thanked 8,923 Times in 7,366 Posts
|
I hear that NPC always say the most obvious thing.
Of course.
That's why I said "The box cavity without the extra wide body width". One could carry the conversation forward by saying "But what about visibility of the taillights from the side".
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-30-2022, 02:06 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,420
Thanks: 540
Thanked 1,205 Times in 1,063 Posts
|
Is there a requirements for side visibility? I know there is one for clearance lights but that solves a different issue. Afaik the only reason the taillights wrap around was so they didn't have to add the clearance markers.
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Piotrsko For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-30-2022, 06:42 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
|
The roof fins caught my attention. I wonder what they do. The standard 911 body should have fully attached airflow and minimal trailing vortices over the rear.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to serialk11r For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-31-2022, 05:00 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
-----------------
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Romania
Posts: 128
Thanks: 23
Thanked 57 Times in 44 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by some_other_dave
That was not done for aerodynamic purposes. That was done because the wheels had to be covered by the fenders, and they wanted to put wider wheels and tires on the car. So they could take corners faster.
Remember that almost any race car would gladly give up a few tenths Cd in order to gain a 10% greater cornering speed.
|
Going over downforce, there are plenty of solutions that help. If they weren't made for aerodynamics, then they shouldn't have put them on.
|
|
|
|
|
08-31-2022, 08:40 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,690
Thanks: 8,143
Thanked 8,923 Times in 7,366 Posts
|
As per some_other_dave, wide-bodies are a solution to component packaging.
The example at Permalink #4 offeres a modernTime Attack quasi-box cavity. As opposed to an aggressive taper.
Aerodynamics is more than down force.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
|
|
