02-16-2013, 02:48 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
The brake pedal is evil
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 401
Thanks: 5
Thanked 57 Times in 52 Posts
|
You know what? Forget the SUV. Give me that dang flying car.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-16-2013, 04:41 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurcher
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 333
Thanks: 149
Thanked 109 Times in 80 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChazInMT
His assumption is that somehow a fan is better at converting gasoline into thrust, if this were the case, we'd all have propeller cars. There's no magic in a propeller, a fan would simply not be more efficient at converting gasoline into usable thrust than turning the tires with a drive shaft.
|
I agree, but there are other reasons for not having propeller cars, the prop would be big and there would be safety and noise issues.
This isn't a pure slam-dunk. Good propellers are about 85% efficient, compared to 90 to 95% efficient gears and tires drive train - so it doesn't look that bad. Only going to waste a little gas.
-mort
|
|
|
02-16-2013, 05:47 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Aero Deshi
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065
Thanks: 430
Thanked 669 Times in 358 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mort
This isn't a pure slam-dunk. Good propellers are about 85% efficient, compared to 90 to 95% efficient gears and tires drive train - so it doesn't look that bad. Only going to waste a little gas.
-mort
|
If by a little gas you mean I'd only get 31MPG with my car as opposed to 35MPG I suppose you're right. And that assumes a perfect propeller design and implementation....something a home built Briggs and Stratton motor with a "who knows the source" propeller is unlikely to yield.
And don't even get me started on the aerodynamic aspect of something sticking up on a vehicle that is at least 2 square feet of added frontal area.
This isn't the worst idea ever, it just really does not pen out at all in being able to improve what is the current drive train.
|
|
|
02-16-2013, 07:48 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: winterpeg, manisnowba
Posts: 211
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
|
i think he means to build one of these
|
|
|
02-16-2013, 08:11 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Aero Deshi
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065
Thanks: 430
Thanked 669 Times in 358 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by baldlobo
i think he means to build one of these
|
Oh, all right then, forget everything I said and carry on straight away.
What was I thinking.
|
|
|
02-16-2013, 08:20 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: winterpeg, manisnowba
Posts: 211
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
|
Last edited by baldlobo; 02-16-2013 at 08:25 PM..
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to baldlobo For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-17-2013, 10:27 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,796
Thanks: 226
Thanked 1,353 Times in 711 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by baldlobo
|
That was a excellent link.
Thanks for posting...
>
|
|
|
02-17-2013, 12:35 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
...loved the blue/white "Rock-n-Roll" Messerschmitt(?) conversion:
|
|
|
02-17-2013, 02:14 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
|
I think he's talking about something like an airboat Airboat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that's used in swampy waterways where a water prop would be fouled. I don't think they're really efficient, as they use a small aircraft engine to attain the sort of speeds you'd get from a much smaller outboard. And I really like the Wikipedia article's understated comment:
Quote:
The engine and propeller are enclosed in a protective metal cage that prevents objects, e.g., tree limbs, branches, clothing, beverage containers, passengers, or wildlife, from coming in contact with the whirling propeller...
|
PS: Just a note re small aircraft efficiency. With my Piper Cherokee 180, I could do about 18 mpg, not far off typical SUV mileage, but I was travelling at ~140 mph, and often cutting miles travelled by a third, or even half, 'cause I didn't have to go around curves.
|
|
|
02-17-2013, 06:19 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Aero Deshi
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065
Thanks: 430
Thanked 669 Times in 358 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf
PS: Just a note re small aircraft efficiency. With my Piper Cherokee 180, I could do about 18 mpg, not far off typical SUV mileage, but I was travelling at ~140 mph, and often cutting miles travelled by a third, or even half, 'cause I didn't have to go around curves.
|
Flew a Warrior when I took lessons a few years back, so I like flying. You do realize that you were getting 18mpg in what is essentially my Civic while doing 140 mph. Fun, yes....Fast, you betcha..... beautiful view, Oh Man....worth every penny, certainly....efficient, debatable.
|
|
|
|