02-20-2013, 05:40 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 1,088
Thanks: 16
Thanked 677 Times in 302 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mort
Almost the opposite. "Coupling" is misdirection. Rockets make vertical climbs totally decoupled from ground friction. If the propeller makes more thrust than than needed to climb the hill then you go up.
Air shows often have hopped up crop-duster biplanes that can make vertical climbs. The Piper Cub can make a 45 degree climb, and no road is that steep.
-mort
|
It's all power to weight ratio, if the thrust exceeds the vehicle weight, then it can climb vertically (but not with a car whose wheels would be spinning long before it reached the vertical portion of the road).
Even though the Cub's nose is pointed up at 45 degrees, the wing's 10 to 20 degree angle of attack means the aircraft's flightpath isn't anywhere near a 45 degree angle.
But propulsion via ground friction allows you to use a "granny gear" to climb up a steep road on very low horsepower. According to my owner's manual, 1st gear allows the 54hp engine in a 67 VW Beetle to propel the 1900 lbs car up a 45% incline (VW beetles are known for their extremely high 1st gears that redline at about 12mph). Show me a 54hp, 1900lbs airplane that can climb out with a flightpath anywhere near that angle.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-20-2013, 05:47 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Carson City, Nevada
Posts: 612
Thanks: 240
Thanked 114 Times in 90 Posts
|
Yup, the good ol' "slow flight" configuration. My instructor made me do HOURS of slow flight. But as promised, it makes you a much better pilot, since your control inputs have to be more precise and "correct".
In fact, we did SO much slow flight practice, he'd pull the fuse on the stall warning buzzer so it wouldn't annoy us!!!
|
|
|
02-20-2013, 11:34 PM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurcher
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 333
Thanks: 151
Thanked 109 Times in 80 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by basjoos
Even though the Cub's nose is pointed up at 45 degrees, the wing's 10 to 20 degree angle of attack means the aircraft's flightpath isn't anywhere near a 45 degree angle.
|
You are right about the old J3C Cub, but there are plenty of aircraft that can make a 45 degree angle of climb.
Quote:
Originally Posted by basjoos
But propulsion via ground friction allows you to use a "granny gear" to climb up a steep road on very low horsepower. According to my owner's manual, 1st gear allows the 54hp engine in a 67 VW Beetle to propel the 1900 lbs car up a 45% incline (VW beetles are known for their extremely high 1st gears that redline at about 12mph). Show me a 54hp, 1900lbs airplane that can climb out with a flightpath anywhere near that angle.
|
Again, if the propeller makes enough thrust you go up.
45% grade is 24.2 degrees - about what that Cub (by the way, last built in 1947) is doing with 65 hp. In any case I don't plan to fly up a steep driveway, but a pusher prop would do the job just as well as a "granny gear"
But what the OP suggests is really having a small engine and pusher prop to provide thrust during those cruise conditions where the SUV's engine is way over sized. Assuming use only during cruise conditions, the prop is 85% efficient and the small engine can be designed for 33% efficiency at that power (combined about 28% efficient) compared to the SUV engine at 22% efficiency and drive train about 95% efficient (combined 21% efficient). A tire - prop hybrid could makes sense - in a unicorny way.
-mort
Last edited by mort; 02-21-2013 at 03:53 PM..
|
|
|
02-20-2013, 11:41 PM
|
#34 (permalink)
|
live, breath, Isuzu-Ds
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: oregon
Posts: 231
Thanks: 1
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mort
But what the OP suggests is really having a small engine and pusher prop to provide thrust during those cruise conditions where the SUV's engine is way over sized. Assuming use only during cruise conditions, the prop is 85% efficient and the small engine can be designed for 33% efficiency at that power (combined about 28% efficient) compared to the SUV engine at 22% efficiency and drive train about 95% efficient (combined 21% efficient). A tire - prop hybrid could makes sense - in a unicorny way.
-mort
|
yes im looking at it for long steady at speed driving at around 40/60 mph
not stop and go town driving.
__________________
1 86 T\D trooper with rare GEN 3 rods TRANS FIXED NOW DD
1 86 4WD 5sp pup is 2.3L gas, but plan on 2.2L diesel repower
1 91 trop, long term plan is a group buy of imported Isuzu 4JB1-T 2.8L I-4 engines, hoping to get price down to 2K not 3K plus
1993 sidekick my MPG toy, epa rating 26.
i get 29/31 with stock drive train.
|
|
|
02-21-2013, 01:40 PM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,697 Times in 1,515 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by baldlobo
|
I wish I could hit my enemies with that
|
|
|
02-21-2013, 03:43 PM
|
#36 (permalink)
|
PSmodder lurker
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chino
Posts: 1,605
Thanks: 26
Thanked 908 Times in 522 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr
I wish I could hit my enemies with that
|
Igor Sikorsky, of the 'other' propeller-vehicle fame, could do better. Developed aerosanis or 'airsleds' for transport and...war!
|
|
|
02-22-2013, 02:13 AM
|
#37 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,697 Times in 1,515 Posts
|
These early Russian snowmobiles look cool. Altough cold weathers are not my cup of tea, I'd like to test-drive it...
|
|
|
02-22-2013, 02:48 PM
|
#39 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
...what's the rate-of-climb for an autogyro?
|
|
|
|