Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-16-2013, 12:54 PM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Mars
Posts: 106

Diabla - '09 Renault Laguna Hatchback
Thanks: 10
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
You haven`t told us how much more the new springs would cost. Lowering does improve mpg but I doubt it would pay for itself. If you go for it, I strongly recommend using progressive or soft springs, so that you do not ruin the already not not so smooth ride quality. It can never ever pay for itself if it ruins your back, even if the signs will show in the distant future, it`s just not worth it to risk sacrificing your health.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-16-2013, 03:21 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,895
Thanks: 23,972
Thanked 7,223 Times in 4,650 Posts
lowering

Lowering,by itself,may not achieve the lowest Cd.Low drag concept cars as the Probe-IV not only lowered the nose,but also raised the tail for out-of-town driving,configuring the 'rake' of the car for overall lowest drag.This is something which a full-scale wind tunnel would be handy for ascertaining.
I'd be inclined to maintain a 'factory' suspension.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2013, 04:04 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: scotland
Posts: 1,429

The Mistress - '88 Bmw 320i Touring SE
Team m8
Last 3: 27.17 mpg (US)

Germany Beadle - '91 Mercedes 300td (estate, N/A)
90 day: 24.63 mpg (US)

The Bloodylingo - '05 Citroen Berlingo Multispace Desire
90 day: 39.77 mpg (US)

Shanner Scaab - '03 Saab 9-5 estate Vector
90 day: 26.19 mpg (US)

Clio 182 - '05 Renault Clio RS 182 182
90 day: 31.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 89
Thanked 89 Times in 74 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowglider View Post
You haven`t told us how much more the new springs would cost. Lowering does improve mpg but I doubt it would pay for itself. If you go for it, I strongly recommend using progressive or soft springs, so that you do not ruin the already not not so smooth ride quality
New springs= £80

New Shocks another £80 for fronts only.

New cheap coilovers £155 (front and rear)

Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
Lowering,by itself,may not achieve the lowest Cd.Low drag concept cars as the Probe-IV not only lowered the nose,but also raised the tail for out-of-town driving,configuring the 'rake' of the car for overall lowest drag.This is something which a full-scale wind tunnel would be handy for ascertaining.
I'd be inclined to maintain a 'factory' suspension.
Duly noted- this being the week before payday, I'm in no position to pay for the bits to alter anything!

interesting re the probe- maybe a front only drop would have similar outcomes?
__________________
My Blog on cars- Fu'Gutty Cars
http://fuguttycars.wordpress.com/

US MPG for my Renault Clio 182


---------------------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2013, 05:05 PM   #14 (permalink)
Got MPG?
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 330

The Car - '09 Toyota Corolla CE Enhanced
Thanks: 13
Thanked 43 Times in 38 Posts
Careful with the cheap coilovers...I have heard stories where they break and/or leak fairly quick..often made with inferior materials...especially cautious if made in China.

Why not some Eibach, H&R or other proven name brand that while lowering the chassis they actually are designed to improve the handling dynamics of the vehicle. Helps with maintaining momentum and keeps more control on windy highways, not to mention can add a little fun back into the driving experience. Also can work with factory shock absorbers with a minimal impact on life expectancy.
__________________
2013 Honda Civic Si - 2.4L
OEM front to back belly pan from the factory.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2013, 05:33 PM   #15 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: ca
Posts: 36
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
I would go with some eibach linear springs not progressive. They come inane different spring rates and are cheap, atleast state side. Just make sure u have the proper Id of the spring u want to fit onto the coil over and don't get cheap stuff like mensioned before
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2013, 06:13 PM   #16 (permalink)
Do more with less
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Eastern Missouri
Posts: 930

OD - '05 Ford Econoline
90 day: 18.64 mpg (US)

Joetta - '86 Volkswagen Jetta Turbo Oil Burner
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 49.71 mpg (US)

Benzilla - '85 Mercedes Benz 300D
90 day: 28.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 177 Times in 112 Posts
When I was a poor student I decided that my new 73 Toyota could use some lowering. I pulled the front coils and cut a full turn off the coils. I was interested in fuel economy as gas was sometimes over 50 cents but was mainly interested in handling.

Reducing a coil will increase the spring rate. I have done it many times on off road motorcycles. If you want to maintain ride height you have to put in a spacer.
__________________
“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.” George Orwell

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe.

The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed.”

Noah Webster, 1787
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2013, 06:15 PM   #17 (permalink)
Do more with less
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Eastern Missouri
Posts: 930

OD - '05 Ford Econoline
90 day: 18.64 mpg (US)

Joetta - '86 Volkswagen Jetta Turbo Oil Burner
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 49.71 mpg (US)

Benzilla - '85 Mercedes Benz 300D
90 day: 28.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 177 Times in 112 Posts
If you have 10 turns on a front coil and it is 10" long then removing one turn will increase the spring rate by 10/9ths and reduce ride height by one inch.

Usually stock springs are way cheaper than aftermarket.
__________________
“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.” George Orwell

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe.

The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed.”

Noah Webster, 1787
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2013, 06:17 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,895
Thanks: 23,972
Thanked 7,223 Times in 4,650 Posts
front only drop

Quote:
Originally Posted by 320touring View Post
New springs= £80

New Shocks another £80 for fronts only.

New cheap coilovers £155 (front and rear)



Duly noted- this being the week before payday, I'm in no position to pay for the bits to alter anything!

interesting re the probe- maybe a front only drop would have similar outcomes?
Too bad for us that Ford never published a drag breakdown of the Probe as it transitioned from 'urban' to 'highway' configuration.
Dropping only the nose would,in essence,effectively raise the boot,taking some bite out of the rear contour.
I suspect that it would lower the drag.I just don't know how to predict a numerical value for it.
If you had access to a closed course,along with instant mpg readout capability,you could substitute rigid links where the shocks go,fixing the ride height at your new target,then drive it only as long as it took to get your new mpg reading.If you liked the number,then it might justify a proper modification.
If the numbers didn't pan out,you'd be out very little time and money.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2013, 06:23 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 668 Times in 410 Posts
I ran with cheapcheapcheap coilovers on my Rabbit for several years and never had a single problem. The ride was rough, though not unbearable. Handling was dramatically improved. Grease the sleeves if you drive in the winter.

You might be able to find some used H&R's or similar for much less money. Look on vwvortex, local VW forums or your local Craigslist type site.

Otherwise the popular cheap brands are Vmaxx, Raceland and Rokkor.

==============================

If anyone in the Michigan area has a Scangauge they'd be willing to lend for a weekend I would very much like to plug it into a car with air suspension (I could probably find someone on MIVE) to get real-time readouts on MPG as a function of ride height.
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store

Last edited by Sven7; 02-20-2013 at 06:35 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2013, 06:37 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,895
Thanks: 23,972
Thanked 7,223 Times in 4,650 Posts
real-time

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven7 View Post
I ran with cheapcheapcheap coilovers on my Rabbit for several years and never had a single problem. The ride was rough, though not unbearable. Handling was dramatically improved.

You might be able to find some used H&R's or similar for much less money. Look on vwvortex, local VW forums or your local Craigslist type site.

Otherwise the popular cheap brands are Vmaxx, Raceland and Rokkor.

==============================

If anyone in the Michigan area has a Scangauge they'd be willing to lend for a weekend I would very much like to plug it into a car with air suspension (I could probably find someone on MIVE) to get real-time readouts on MPG as a function of ride height.
Man,that would be a great contribution.We could also look at mpg as a function of steady road velocity and begin constructing mpg vs speed tables.
Hope that falls together!

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
Sven7 (02-20-2013)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com