Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-23-2013, 09:05 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903

honda cb125 - '74 Honda CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuter Vehicles Inc. Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Honda Civic VX
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
Driving is over rated, I see a lot of people walk or bike past my house every day on their way to work, people in their 40's 50's and 60's, neighbors that while they own a car are not driving because they choose to live where they spend their time.

I grew up with back to the land parents who wanted to live in the country or as part of a commune I never liked the 5 mile long bike ride to get in to town, so when I was looking to buy my first house top of my list was a house that I could walk to where I wanted to be and slowly everyone else I know started moving in to the same neighborhood for the same reasons.

It's not just about saving money and being able to live on a lower paying or a part time job, but being able to spend your time doing something with your time that is more meaningful then sitting in a car and spending all of your money fueling, maintaining and insuring that car.

Look at the figures on driving an EV for "free" compared to a gasoline car you realize pretty quickly how expensive the average car is for it's owner, even if you factor in repair costs of a used car, because so many people don't do their own work, owning a car costs a lot! $0.20 to $0.50 per mile for a reasonable vehicle.


Last edited by Ryland; 05-23-2013 at 09:49 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-23-2013, 09:11 PM   #12 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
^Yup. Maybe some are starting to catch on. But there's a looooong way to go.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2013, 10:22 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903

honda cb125 - '74 Honda CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuter Vehicles Inc. Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Honda Civic VX
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
^Yup. Maybe some are starting to catch on. But there's a looooong way to go.
At work whenever I have to give someone a bid I am often shocked at how impressed people are that I can do basic math in my head, because it turns out most people can't handle doing basic math in their day to day life and long commutes are a great example of that in so many ways.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2013, 02:40 AM   #14 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,562
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,625 Times in 1,450 Posts
With gas prices going on and on, and EPA whining against Diesel engines, I'd expect to see more folks going carless. For many folks a small motorcycle with a single-cylinder engine is more than enought, and as a last resource a side-car can be used to improve cargo capacity and stability.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2013, 12:54 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
101Volts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 506

Woody - '90 Mercury Grand Marquis Wagon LS
Last 3: 19.57 mpg (US)

Brick - '99 Chevrolet K2500 Suburban LS
Last 3: 12.94 mpg (US)

M. C. - '01 Chevrolet Impala Base
90 day: 17.09 mpg (US)

R. J. - '05 Ford Explorer 4wd
90 day: 16.66 mpg (US)
Thanks: 934
Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts
I'm 21 and I don't leave the house much, The most I drive is to get groceries with my Father. I don't care for the ridiculous new cars much, I can't afford to buy a new one for one thing and we already have the Caprice in the garage. It might get fuel economy equivalent to a Caravan with a spare tire on the roof, But at least it runs and doesn't have a microwave built-in. Who needs that sort of thing. But, I'm one person - Not a majority.

It won't be too surprising for things to become similar to the ways they were 500 years ago. And if we end up having lots of dirt roads, You can kiss the high tire pressures goodbye to keep the car's suspension system longer.

And on a similar note, The Amish folk seem to have things going fairly well. I don't think they get excessive-driving fatigue much!

Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
With gas prices going on and on, and EPA whining against Diesel engines, I'd expect to see more folks going carless. For many folks a small motorcycle with a single-cylinder engine is more than enought, and as a last resource a side-car can be used to improve cargo capacity and stability.
Just keeping noise in mind at night, Hopefully:

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2013, 03:15 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,013

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 42.77 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 466 Times in 287 Posts
My 17 year old daughter does not want a drivers license. Maybe someday, she says.

My truck cost $22K brand new. My previous truck, a 1995 Dodge Dakota 5 spd 2WD standard cab, cost $14,000 brand new. That $31K average is pushed up by the oversized optioned up vehicles.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2013, 06:31 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,665
Thanks: 7,767
Thanked 8,575 Times in 7,061 Posts
Quote:
Quote:
The average new car costs nearly $31,000, according to TrueCar.com
Are you f***ing kidding me? Who in the hell spends $31k on a car?
Apparently your average new car buyer.

(Who in the hell buys a new car?)

OOh, there was a whole second page. I was telling someone at the grocery store today that car insurance is like feeding a horse oats—you have to pay whether you ride or not.

Last edited by freebeard; 05-26-2013 at 06:36 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2013, 11:05 AM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Somebody's got to buy them new, or there soon won't be any second hand cars available

I buy new cars as I don't want to inherit someone else's hidden troubles.
As it is, the last few new ones were giving enough troubles ...
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2013, 04:25 PM   #19 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,562
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,625 Times in 1,450 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMichler View Post
My truck cost $22K brand new. My previous truck, a 1995 Dodge Dakota 5 spd 2WD standard cab, cost $14,000 brand new. That $31K average is pushed up by the oversized optioned up vehicles.
And also by the nanny-government mandating many safety features and emissions control devices which increase weight and manufacturing complexity
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cRiPpLe_rOoStEr For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (05-28-2013)
Old 05-28-2013, 05:03 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 593
Thanks: 106
Thanked 114 Times in 72 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
And also by the nanny-government mandating many safety features and emissions control devices which increase weight and manufacturing complexity
Though I do think modern driver safety features are a bit nannying and unnecessary (and may make many of us worse drivers) - any time I get behind an old pre-70s survivor with no cats and no feedback controlled engine & have to breathe its dense exhaust I'm glad there aren't a million more of them in my city.

__________________
Work From Home mod has saved more fuel than everything else put together.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com