Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-12-2010, 10:47 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
Thanks Patrick -- I think the key phrase is "so long as the terrain has a significant roughness in relation to the wheel diameter"

Roads are typically fairly smooth, and other than potholes, they do not have "a significant roughness in relation to the wheel diameter". Nothing a little experimentation wouldn't help determine.

__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-13-2010, 01:43 AM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcb View Post
these guys don't flex much
Yeah, but if you cut off the flanges, they corner like cr*p :-(
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2010, 01:48 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
Roads are typically fairly smooth, and other than potholes, they do not have "a significant roughness in relation to the wheel diameter".
Err... And where do YOU live? Around here, a good many roads (the major paved ones, not dirt or paved side roads) are pretty darned rough. I can & do see significant differences in real-time mpg on different stretches of (level) road. And of course there's I-80 over the Sierra: the last time I drove that, I was worrying about high-centering on the ruts that traffic had worn into the concrete.

Last edited by jamesqf; 07-13-2010 at 12:59 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2010, 04:30 AM   #14 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I'm in the Not Ga Ga Over Solid Tires camp.

I think bicycles offer the perfect illustration why. For decades my ride was a Fuji road bike with 27 x 1 tires at 105 psi. I still have it but now I much prefer to hop on my full-suspension mountain bike with 26 x I think 2" slicks at 65 psi- and that's just for going around town 100% on pavement. The comfort factor in favor of the MTB is practically beyond debate, but I've found the r.r. on the much heavier bike with the lower pressure fatties to be very favorably comparable. So I'm not beat up OR worn out when I get there.

You know, once upon a time solid tires were the standard and pneumatics shoved em out of the market partly because of the rolling resistance improvement- as noted in a previous post.

I suppose if a vehicle rides like crap it would save gas... cuz nobody would want to use it unless it was absolutely necessary.

That said, I could totally get behind a compliant yet airless tire system, if only to address my impression that only, oh, 10% of the motoring public knows what a pressure gauge and air hose are for.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2010, 04:46 AM   #15 (permalink)
Hypermiling rookie
 
Laurentiu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Limassol , CY
Posts: 288

Opel Corsa B - '96 Opel Corsa 1.2 8V
90 day: 47.27 mpg (US)

VW Bora 1.6 16V - '02 Volkswagen Bora/Jetta
90 day: 35.84 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 36 Times in 21 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
I'm in the Not Ga Ga Over Solid Tires camp.
well, there's solid tires and there's airless designs of tires (a.k.a. "tweels"), totally different things.
We have to look out for these in the future when they manage to outcome some of their drawbacks (such as vibration &noise)


Video
__________________






"It has been my observation that most people get ahead during the time that others waste" Henry Ford
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2010, 06:23 AM   #16 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 794
Thanks: 4
Thanked 388 Times in 237 Posts
I think you'll find the airless tires has more mass than the pnuematic tires - which is probably why you haven't heard much from the vehicle manufacturers on this subject.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2010, 10:39 AM   #17 (permalink)
The road not so traveled
 
TheEnemy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 680

The Truck - '99 Nissan Frontier xe
90 day: 25.74 mpg (US)

The Ugly Duck - '84 Jeep CJ7 Rock crawler
Thanks: 18
Thanked 66 Times in 57 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
Err... And where do YOU live? A good many roads (the major paved ones, not dirt or paved side roads) are pretty darned rough. I can & do see significant differences in real-time mpg on different stretches of (level) road. And of course there's I-80 over the Sierra: the last time I drove that, I was worrying about high-centering on the ruts that traffic had worn into the concrete.
I had the same thoughts, ouch. New Mexico is NOT known for smooth roads, and those are the ones that are paved.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2010, 10:48 AM   #18 (permalink)
The road not so traveled
 
TheEnemy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 680

The Truck - '99 Nissan Frontier xe
90 day: 25.74 mpg (US)

The Ugly Duck - '84 Jeep CJ7 Rock crawler
Thanks: 18
Thanked 66 Times in 57 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurentiu View Post
well, there's solid tires and there's airless designs of tires (a.k.a. "tweels"), totally different things.
We have to look out for these in the future when they manage to outcome some of their drawbacks (such as vibration &noise)


Video
Are they planning on sealing up the sides of those tires? I could just imagine getting 5lbs of mud stuck into the side throwing them way out of ballance.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TheEnemy For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (07-13-2010)
Old 07-13-2010, 12:07 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
You of course, would have to tune the suspension to work with solid/airless tires. And if you did have regenerative shock absorbers, the solid tires would "pass along" most of the energy to the shocks; rather than the tire heating up.

The "TWEELS" are all made to work just like pneumatic tires -- and not only with dirt/mud/snow build up in those open cells -- the aero drag from these is pretty horrible, too.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2010, 12:48 PM   #20 (permalink)
The road not so traveled
 
TheEnemy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 680

The Truck - '99 Nissan Frontier xe
90 day: 25.74 mpg (US)

The Ugly Duck - '84 Jeep CJ7 Rock crawler
Thanks: 18
Thanked 66 Times in 57 Posts
I'm not going to say it cant be done, because suspension systems have advanced so far as it is, but running a solid/airless tire makes it harder to get a smooth comfortable ride that will be necessary for the masses to accept them as an option. On top of that the transition to motors in the hubs is going to increase the unsprung weight putting even more demand on the suspension to smooth things out.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Online tool: shows aerodynamic drag, rolling resistance, power required & est. MPG MetroMPG Aerodynamics 100 12-30-2022 06:25 AM
Top 5 most fuel efficient tires (Lowest Rolling resistance: LRR) blackjackel General Efficiency Discussion 144 01-25-2016 11:39 PM
Discussion on tire efficiency Ernie Rogers General Efficiency Discussion 69 12-27-2014 01:17 PM
Calculating Rolling Resistance SVOboy EcoModding Central 2 02-15-2012 08:43 PM
Measure tire rolling resistance with a bounce test Ernie Rogers EcoModding Central 8 01-08-2010 07:36 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com