04-02-2015, 07:18 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Mechanical engineer
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,276
Thanks: 273
Thanked 844 Times in 417 Posts
|
Renault Optifuel lab II aerodynamic truck concept
Renault have released their second fuel efficiency truck concept.
They have dropped the fuel consumption from 32,7 liters to 25,4l/100km or 9.2 MPG us with 33 tonn total weigth. Thats 22% improvement. Thats also 0,76l/tonne fuel consumption. Max weigth would have been 40 tonn and that would have made l/tonn fuel consumption better.
Renault Test Truck Cuts Fuel Consumption 22% · Environmental Leader · Environmental Management & Sustainable Development News
Pics: https://www.google.fi/search?q=renau...w=1360&bih=631
PS: I would not call this aerodynamic either as there is still so much more room for improvement or even good fuel consumption figures as there are things also mechanically that could be done.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Vekke For This Useful Post:
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
04-02-2015, 06:03 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,941
Thanks: 8,217
Thanked 8,988 Times in 7,425 Posts
|
What's with all the trucks lately? Maybe it's the thought that occurred to me the other day: Hyperloop freight trains.
|
|
|
|
|
04-02-2015, 07:05 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,391
Thanks: 24,469
Thanked 7,409 Times in 4,800 Posts
|
improvement
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vekke
|
Renault's 1987 V.I.R.A.G.E. achieved Cd 0.29 with the extended boat tail.
Also in 1987 they had their own 'BIONIC/Boxfish' Vesta II,Cd 0.187 and 100+ mpg.
The 1985 Renault ORPHEE concept achieved Cd 0.129 and they predicted that they'd be at Cd 0.10 within a decade.
I feel like they are quite capable of low drag.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
Last edited by aerohead; 04-03-2015 at 05:22 PM..
Reason: add data
|
|
|
|
|
04-02-2015, 09:05 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,556 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Looks like it relies too much on a matching trailer while out in the real world, one tractor has to hook up to many different trailers.
|
|
|
|
|
04-02-2015, 10:13 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,941
Thanks: 8,217
Thanked 8,988 Times in 7,425 Posts
|
Fix the trailers first?
|
|
|
|
|
04-02-2015, 10:29 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
aero enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 92
Thanks: 157
Thanked 67 Times in 41 Posts
|
Fairly smooth looking rig for a cab over. I like the rake of the front and whats up with the intake above front window? Pressurize the gap behind cap or feed air to reefer unit?
I think this cab would work well with most of the standard trailers, especially with side skirts and trailer-tails, which are becoming almost normal now
|
|
|
|
|
04-03-2015, 01:50 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,556 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
Fix the trailers first?
|
Make the flatbeds, reefers, box, and all others the same?
|
|
|
|
|
