Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-04-2019, 05:59 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 420

Oh Deer - '03 Ford Ranger XL
90 day: 33.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 50
Thanked 65 Times in 52 Posts
Reverse mud flaps

So I was out at the pick-n-pull Saturday looking for a bed extender for my Ranger. No such luck unfortunately. But I did notice the mud flaps on quite a few Rangers. We usually say "Get rid of those mud flaps ASAP." but I wondered if you switched sides and reversed them, if they would be like a wheel spat of sorts. So I took one off to see how it fit on the other side. Surprisingly well I thought so I grabbed the four best ones I could find and brought them home. Set me back a whopping $8 so no big loss if the brain trust here thinks its a bad idea. I duct taped them on for these pictures so no body work was harmed as of yet.

What do you think?

The rears also swapped over pretty well. Would it be a good or bad idea to give the rear wheels the same treatment? Pay no attention to the factory mud flaps still there. They will be gone before you all get a chance to read this.






Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20190804_162957855_HDR.jpg
Views:	496
Size:	42.4 KB
ID:	26634   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20190804_162949628_HDR.jpg
Views:	491
Size:	50.0 KB
ID:	26635   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20190804_163304488.jpg
Views:	494
Size:	32.6 KB
ID:	26636  
__________________



  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to hat_man For This Useful Post:
freebeard (09-05-2019), slowmover (09-21-2019)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-04-2019, 06:44 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
nemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: US
Posts: 909

Chief - '06 Pontiac Grand Prix
90 day: 24.66 mpg (US)

SF1 - '12 Ford Fiesta S
90 day: 23.71 mpg (US)
Thanks: 161
Thanked 199 Times in 155 Posts
Looks like a good fit. Any idea how you are going to determine ideal size.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2019, 07:19 PM   #3 (permalink)
EV convert
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 7,750

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 124.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 178
Thanked 2,443 Times in 1,903 Posts
I did it on my leaf.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2019, 07:19 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 420

Oh Deer - '03 Ford Ranger XL
90 day: 33.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 50
Thanked 65 Times in 52 Posts
Didn't know there was an "ideal" size. I just planned on leaving them as is.
__________________



  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2019, 07:20 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 420

Oh Deer - '03 Ford Ranger XL
90 day: 33.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 50
Thanked 65 Times in 52 Posts
Did you do the rears also oil pan 4?
__________________



  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2019, 07:27 PM   #6 (permalink)
EV convert
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 7,750

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 124.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 178
Thanked 2,443 Times in 1,903 Posts
Yeah I had to buy the full OEM set.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2019, 10:08 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
slowmover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,341

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,336
Thanked 677 Times in 515 Posts
Brake cooling is the only thing that comes to mind. Some truck owners “cover” front & rear on trailer tires, but this is mainly to keep the trailer clean. Same with some aftermarket fender designs for the tractor drive axles.

The 579 Peterbilt I’m in has the FE-conscious EPIQ package. And (brand) FLOW BELOW tractor drive axle package.

Stock, the tractor features Texas Flyswatter mudflaps. But conventional polished steel front quarter fenders.

Now, the Steer Tires have terrific enclosure. No spats, per se. Embiggen the pics. The tire enclosure extends from fender inwards to tire. A very very small gap remains.

Air is prevented from getting underneath the tractor. Essentially.

.

.



Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	AF29F20F-73AE-41E7-9357-6E14642AD001.jpg
Views:	494
Size:	75.8 KB
ID:	26637   Click image for larger version

Name:	E680BBDB-9AE9-4F89-B3E5-FDAC7C2834C6.jpeg
Views:	506
Size:	98.6 KB
ID:	26638  
__________________
2004.0 DODGE Ram QC/LB 2500 2WD/NV-5600 305/555 ISB. 7,940-lb. Stock. 200,000 miles/5000-hrs @ 40-mph average.
1990 35' Silver Streak TT 7,900-lb.
11-cpm solo & 19-cpm towing; 21-mpg average past 54k-miles
Sold: 1983 Silver Streak 3411

Last edited by slowmover; 08-04-2019 at 10:20 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2019, 10:41 AM   #8 (permalink)
Tyrant-at-large
 
Vman455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 1,431

Little Red - retired - '05 Honda Civic EX
90 day: 49.03 mpg (US)

Pope Pious the Prius - '13 Toyota Prius Two
Team Toyota
90 day: 55.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 142
Thanked 1,204 Times in 635 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hat_man View Post
Didn't know there was an "ideal" size. I just planned on leaving them as is.
Some manufacturers use huge strakes. Just look at the rear of the Nissan Murano:



Or GM full-size trucks:

__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2019, 09:58 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 3,543

Gaptooth (retired) - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 54.26 mpg (US)

Such Fit - '07 Honda Fit Sport
90 day: 41.27 mpg (US)

Connect - '15 Ford Transit Connect XL
90 day: 23.93 mpg (US)

K-sight - '00 Honda K-sight
90 day: 40.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,311
Thanked 1,454 Times in 923 Posts
My Insight has strakes from the factory. My concern would be that the flap would blow against the tire at highway speeds, and rub on it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2019, 05:35 PM   #10 (permalink)
Tyrant-at-large
 
Vman455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 1,431

Little Red - retired - '05 Honda Civic EX
90 day: 49.03 mpg (US)

Pope Pious the Prius - '13 Toyota Prius Two
Team Toyota
90 day: 55.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 142
Thanked 1,204 Times in 635 Posts
My strake enlargements are made from indoor/outdoor rubber mat from the hardware store:



Granted, they wrap around the wheel liner, but I've never had any contact/rubbing issues.

__________________

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com