Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-04-2019, 05:59 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 475

Oh Deer - '03 Ford Ranger XL
90 day: 33.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 55
Thanked 91 Times in 72 Posts
Reverse mud flaps

So I was out at the pick-n-pull Saturday looking for a bed extender for my Ranger. No such luck unfortunately. But I did notice the mud flaps on quite a few Rangers. We usually say "Get rid of those mud flaps ASAP." but I wondered if you switched sides and reversed them, if they would be like a wheel spat of sorts. So I took one off to see how it fit on the other side. Surprisingly well I thought so I grabbed the four best ones I could find and brought them home. Set me back a whopping $8 so no big loss if the brain trust here thinks its a bad idea. I duct taped them on for these pictures so no body work was harmed as of yet.

What do you think?

The rears also swapped over pretty well. Would it be a good or bad idea to give the rear wheels the same treatment? Pay no attention to the factory mud flaps still there. They will be gone before you all get a chance to read this.






Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20190804_162957855_HDR.jpg
Views:	933
Size:	42.4 KB
ID:	26634   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20190804_162949628_HDR.jpg
Views:	899
Size:	50.0 KB
ID:	26635   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20190804_163304488.jpg
Views:	867
Size:	32.6 KB
ID:	26636  
__________________
If nice guys finish last, are you willing to pay the price to finish first ?




  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to hat_man For This Useful Post:
freebeard (09-05-2019), slowmover (09-21-2019)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-04-2019, 06:44 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
nemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: US
Posts: 1,015

Chief - '06 Pontiac Grand Prix
90 day: 26.7 mpg (US)

SF1 - '12 Ford Fiesta S
90 day: 30.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 195
Thanked 247 Times in 190 Posts
Looks like a good fit. Any idea how you are going to determine ideal size.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2019, 07:19 PM   #3 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,184

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,527 Times in 2,801 Posts
I did it on my leaf.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2019, 07:19 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 475

Oh Deer - '03 Ford Ranger XL
90 day: 33.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 55
Thanked 91 Times in 72 Posts
Didn't know there was an "ideal" size. I just planned on leaving them as is.
__________________
If nice guys finish last, are you willing to pay the price to finish first ?




  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2019, 07:20 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 475

Oh Deer - '03 Ford Ranger XL
90 day: 33.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 55
Thanked 91 Times in 72 Posts
Did you do the rears also oil pan 4?
__________________
If nice guys finish last, are you willing to pay the price to finish first ?




  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2019, 07:27 PM   #6 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,184

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,527 Times in 2,801 Posts
Yeah I had to buy the full OEM set.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2019, 10:08 PM   #7 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
Brake cooling is the only thing that comes to mind. Some truck owners “cover” front & rear on trailer tires, but this is mainly to keep the trailer clean. Same with some aftermarket fender designs for the tractor drive axles.

The 579 Peterbilt I’m in has the FE-conscious EPIQ package. And (brand) FLOW BELOW tractor drive axle package.

Stock, the tractor features Texas Flyswatter mudflaps. But conventional polished steel front quarter fenders.

Now, the Steer Tires have terrific enclosure. No spats, per se. Embiggen the pics. The tire enclosure extends from fender inwards to tire. A very very small gap remains.

Air is prevented from getting underneath the tractor. Essentially.

.

.



Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	AF29F20F-73AE-41E7-9357-6E14642AD001.jpg
Views:	925
Size:	75.8 KB
ID:	26637   Click image for larger version

Name:	E680BBDB-9AE9-4F89-B3E5-FDAC7C2834C6.jpeg
Views:	895
Size:	98.6 KB
ID:	26638  

Last edited by slowmover; 08-04-2019 at 10:20 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2019, 10:41 AM   #8 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Vman455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Urbana, IL
Posts: 1,936

Pope Pious the Prius - '13 Toyota Prius Two
Team Toyota
SUV
90 day: 51.62 mpg (US)

Tycho the Truck - '91 Toyota Pickup DLX 4WD
90 day: 22.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 199
Thanked 1,801 Times in 938 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hat_man View Post
Didn't know there was an "ideal" size. I just planned on leaving them as is.
Some manufacturers use huge strakes. Just look at the rear of the Nissan Murano:



Or GM full-size trucks:

__________________
UIUC Aerospace Engineering
www.amateuraerodynamics.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2019, 09:58 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,014

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 40.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,869
Thanked 2,513 Times in 1,553 Posts
My Insight has strakes from the factory. My concern would be that the flap would blow against the tire at highway speeds, and rub on it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2019, 05:35 PM   #10 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Vman455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Urbana, IL
Posts: 1,936

Pope Pious the Prius - '13 Toyota Prius Two
Team Toyota
SUV
90 day: 51.62 mpg (US)

Tycho the Truck - '91 Toyota Pickup DLX 4WD
90 day: 22.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 199
Thanked 1,801 Times in 938 Posts
My strake enlargements are made from indoor/outdoor rubber mat from the hardware store:



Granted, they wrap around the wheel liner, but I've never had any contact/rubbing issues.

__________________
UIUC Aerospace Engineering
www.amateuraerodynamics.com
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com