06-10-2014, 01:39 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Evansville Ill.
Posts: 101
Thanks: 209
Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts
|
Reversing the box works
Another success! I tested it with the box pointing forward and then reversed it and picked up about 2 mpg! 1 http://i532.photobucket.com/albums/e...ps8e84e3b4.jpg
__________________
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to chumly For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
06-10-2014, 02:30 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Drive less save more
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,189
Thanks: 134
Thanked 162 Times in 135 Posts
|
I'm suspicious of your results. Sorry but I'm a Skeptical person today..
Being that its all tucked in behind the car then cooler, but what do I know, it is a little boat tail , anyways Glad to hear you Up'ed your mpg !
__________________
Save gas
Ride a Mtn bike for errands exercise entertainment and outright fun
__________________
|
|
|
06-10-2014, 03:04 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Evansville Ill.
Posts: 101
Thanks: 209
Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts
|
I admit that the test wasn't the best but according to my scangage it was about 2 mpg . I was just on a trip with it full of camping gear and my 1st tank was over 54 mpg driving the speed limit after I lowered the tire pressure and replaced the hai with a cai for pulling. I have been averaging about 52-55 mpg lately with the hai and tires pumped up to sidewall max so I'm very happy with the results. Mpg on way home was about 53 mpg with my (leadfoot )wife driving!
__________________
|
|
|
06-10-2014, 09:40 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
I like it. It's a good way to arrange a horrible cargo mess.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
06-11-2014, 12:42 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master Novice
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
|
I'm not surprised at that. I suspect you would experience even greater results if you were to, somewhat paradoxically, make the cargo box much larger to do a better job of filling the pressure wake, and radically shorten the gap between the rear of your vehicle and the front of the cargo box. You would pick up a lot of enclosed volume and possibly experience a big jump in your towing fuel economy.
__________________
Lead or follow. Either is fine.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to elhigh For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-11-2014, 05:15 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Elmira, NY
Posts: 1,790
Thanks: 320
Thanked 360 Times in 299 Posts
|
I agree with elhigh!
|
|
|
06-11-2014, 06:12 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
|
The smart has a little back area and storage under the rear. It looks like what little you could put in that storage box you could just put in your car if not passenger seat.
|
|
|
06-11-2014, 09:31 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Evansville Ill.
Posts: 101
Thanks: 209
Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobb
The smart has a little back area and storage under the rear. It looks like what little you could put in that storage box you could just put in your car if not passenger seat.
|
Obviously you have never gone camping with my wife. What surprised me was that pulling that much extra weight and driving faster than normal the mpg was still better with the trailer than the same weight would have been without. There's no way I could have packed it all in the car although I have already gotten TWO shopping carts full of groceries in the car along with me and the wife! There is no storage under the rear, that's where the motor is. Chumly
__________________
|
|
|
06-11-2014, 11:59 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
|
Yeah, Ive seen a few smarts up close and they got some cargo room. Seeing such a small trailer I thought you could just pack it in around your passenger.
It all depends on how you effect the aero. You can ask 10 different people and get 10 different answers. I was of the assumption a double headed bullet was the best aero shape, which is close to what you got now with the box backwards. I mean those who experiment with camel backs are basically doing the same thing.
|
|
|
06-12-2014, 01:28 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Not banned yet
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas Coast, close to Houston
Posts: 907
Blue - '03 Chevy S-10, LS
Thanks: 423
Thanked 266 Times in 213 Posts
|
__________________
2003 S-10, 2.2L, 5 speed, ext cab long bed.
So far: DRL delete, remove bed mount toolbox.
|
|
|
|