04-19-2009, 11:42 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
Ya think these guys noticed any change in MPG and wind noise ?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Cd For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-11-2010, 07:44 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
San Diego Ranger
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 19
Toyota - '06 Toyota Corolla Sport 90 day: 34.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikel09
The wrath of roof rack and roofboxes has been independently tested by Edmonds and Consumer Reports. The impact was 17-25% depending on car, speed type of carrier. I have been developing an idea based on shortened boat tail plates tested on semi trailers, integrated in a cargo carrier for suvs, wagons, hatch backs, and sedans.
Essentially a back mounted aerodynamic cargo carrier. It eliminates the ~20% mpg penalty of roof top carriers and has improved mpg 5-10%, in preliminary tests with the boat tail design. We use it for camping, family road trips, ski equipment etc. AeroPACKusa is the product. I would appreciate your comments. Thanks!
|
I like it. If you ever make anything like that for a surfboard let me know.
Also just brainstorming if you created a quickly removable, easily secured tie-down system and sold it fairly cheap you could make a killing here in Southern California targeting the surfing industry. The current selection of 'inexpensive' racks is not that great at all.
|
|
|
02-12-2010, 03:20 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,528
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,977 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
lucidexp: you might be on to something. I remember another EM member way back when who signed up specifically to noodle about a better way to deal with his surfboard roof rack.
Also: I missed it when Mikel09 originally posted, but I think he might have contacted me first to ask if he could mention his product on the forum. (And I said, "sure.")
|
|
|
02-12-2010, 03:30 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
San Diego Ranger
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 19
Toyota - '06 Toyota Corolla Sport 90 day: 34.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
lucidexp: you might be on to something. I remember another EM member way back when who signed up specifically to noodle about a better way to deal with his surfboard roof rack.
Also: I missed it when Mikel09 originally posted, but I think he might have contacted me first to ask if he could mention his product on the forum. (And I said, "sure.")
|
Being a fellow surfer and having my truck die on me I have had to resort to having a car, but dont want to give up surfing because of it.
I have looked around and tried a few but several current version of removable racks are really, really bad. I have seen some flatable roof racks but they sell for around $100 and for that you are better off getting a 'real' rack.
I have the design tools and a degree in architecture, willing to give the design away since I just want a solution.
|
|
|
02-13-2010, 11:33 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: California
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Guys this sounds interesting. Are you thinking about a roof mount or back mount surfboard carrier? What are your thoughts on the concept?
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucidexp
Being a fellow surfer and having my truck die on me I have had to resort to having a car, but dont want to give up surfing because of it.
I have looked around and tried a few but several current version of removable racks are really, really bad. I have seen some flatable roof racks but they sell for around $100 and for that you are better off getting a 'real' rack.
I have the design tools and a degree in architecture, willing to give the design away since I just want a solution.
|
|
|
|
02-15-2010, 04:21 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,528
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,977 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucidexp
I have the design tools and a degree in architecture, willing to give the design away since I just want a solution.
|
New thread! (Please, if you're going to do it.)
|
|
|
05-31-2013, 10:07 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
EcoModding and having fun
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Fairbanks, AK
Posts: 111
Thanks: 15
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
i know this is an old thread but im wondering would it make any difference if i make a roof rack and mounted it on an aero cap?? would that be worse that just keeping my truck cap and putting the bike inside?
|
|
|
06-01-2013, 01:02 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 188
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
|
My brother has an F250 with an aero topper. It's described here: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...250-16798.html
Since then, he added four eyebolts to the topper for tying down a 13 foot canoe. The canoe lays upside down on the topper with one end over the cab and the other end sticking out back a little bit. He has not noticed a mileage decrease with that setup, so any mileage hit is less than 1 MPG.
I think his success is due to the canoe being down tight against the topper.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.
22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
|
|
|
06-14-2018, 11:18 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,528
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,977 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
CR adds some data: Honda Accord, Toyota Camry
Updating this 11 year-old thread...
Consumer Reports asked:
What's the Impact of Carrying Stuff on the Roof?
They tested with a 2013 Honda Accord at 65 mph / 105 km/h.
- 42 mpg US - baseline with nothing on the roof
- 37 mpg - empty bike rack
- 35 mpg - empty bike rack with wind deflector (made it quieter, but increased drag)
- 27 mpg - two bikes on the rack (didn't specify deflector or not)
They also tested a 2008 Camry with a large car-top carrier...
- fuel economy dropped by 5 mpg
Source: https://www.consumerreports.org/fuel...l-economy-now/
Moral of the story: carry stuff inside the car or on the back whenever possible!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-14-2018, 04:45 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Thalmaturge
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The edge of nowhere
Posts: 1,164
Thanks: 766
Thanked 643 Times in 429 Posts
|
I put a pair of Kayaks on my Civic hybrid to drive to the lake near my dad's house. I made ~48mpg getting to his house (11.5 hour drive). Going from his house to the lake and back (1.5 hours) with the Kayaks on, the drag was so great I had to use 4th gear to maintain 60mph on the backroads without flattening my hybrid battery... I made about 35 mpg.
Huge difference. Note: I had an aero-clean car (no rack) for the drive to his place, the Kayaks were put on one of those gutter strap-down roof racks he had at his place.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to samwichse For This Useful Post:
|
|
|