Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-22-2012, 08:07 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
Similar, but with strange winglets.


Mercedes-Benz Weltrekordwagen T 80 silver 1939 vl2 by stkone, on Flickr

I remember someone saying that the aero template we use will work up to 250 or so mph. Out of curiosity, how does it change when a car goes, say, 300 or 400 mph?

__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-23-2012, 05:58 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,187
Thanks: 132
Thanked 2,809 Times in 1,973 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven7 View Post
(It's also interesting to note that this is very different from Jaray's approach to streamlining)(
This was the point of my 2-Point design which matured into a 5-Point design.

It's fine and dandy to develop a 1-Point design, but if wheels and people cannot fit into it, then what good is it?

By taking each of the major elements, the 4-wheels (+4) and the passenger/driver canopy (the +1) and optimizing those for aerodynamics we arrive at a more practical 5-Point solution.

In practice this approach shows up as salt flat racers and several LeMans type race cars.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2012, 07:46 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,314
Thanks: 24,440
Thanked 7,386 Times in 4,783 Posts
Cd

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeanBurn View Post
I never found what the Cd of that car was...does anyone know?
I have no published number for the car.
Korff penned a similar Bonneville racer in 1962 which had less of a tail,no wheel fairings,but plan taper.He assigned Cd 0.16 to it.
Mickey Thompson's Challenger I is reported at Cd 0.16.
I would guestimate the 666 at around Cd 0.15 because of the care they spent on the wheels.If she had the plan taper she'd be knocking on the door of Cd 0.11 or so.
The 1957 MG EX 181 with plan taper is reported at Cd 0.12 and it did not have the wheels as well cleaned up as Satan's swoopy salt blaster.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 01:24 PM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
JackMcCornack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 179
Thanks: 5
Thanked 39 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
It would be devilish to drive -- there is almost no way to see out? Obviously only meant for the salt flats.
Gosh, Neil, ya think? Along with the limited visibility, there are other clues indicating that it's a single-purpose car. For example, there's no rear license plate...and a good thing there isn't, since a license plate would probably increase drag by 40%.
__________________
Modding MAX, a Kubota-powered classic sports car
http://www.kineticvehicles.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 01:37 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackMcCornack View Post
..and a good thing there isn't, since a license plate would probably increase drag by 40%.
Just thinking, what with modern technology and all, do you suppose you could put the license plate flat to the body (perhaps covered with a clear fairing), and project a holograph of it to be visible from the rear?
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2012, 06:56 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,314
Thanks: 24,440
Thanked 7,386 Times in 4,783 Posts
250 +

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven7 View Post
Similar, but with strange winglets.


Mercedes-Benz Weltrekordwagen T 80 silver 1939 vl2 by stkone, on Flickr

I remember someone saying that the aero template we use will work up to 250 or so mph. Out of curiosity, how does it change when a car goes, say, 300 or 400 mph?
For a vehicle in ground proximity at 250 mph up to local Mach-1,'transonic' flow begins,where compressibility affects of the air and supervelocities caused by the vehicles own acceleration of the flow field around the body can conceivably produce local supersonic shockwaves.
Since subsonic drag is governed by separation and wake drag and supersonic drag is governed by shockwaves created at the nose,it becomes necessary to allow for a more ogival nose to mitigate any shockwaves .
So,for racing and unlimited-speed sections of the Auto Strada and Autobahn,the more 'pointed' nose is required.
Early supersonic LSR vehicles were designed with v-bottoms which would allow the shockwaves reflected from the ground to pass by the body vertically,essentially making the bottom a 'nose.'

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com