Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-28-2016, 06:43 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Should I fit a rear spoiler like most modern cars?

I notice most new cars these days that have a steep rear window (estates/station wagons etc.) have a spoiler above the rear window.

Am I wrong in assuming they have fuel economy aero benefits, as well as being for styling?





Is it worth me putting one on my old '94 Citroen BX (same as photo but I don't have roofracks)?


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-28-2016, 07:42 PM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
If you could find Cd data on a comparable model with and without a spoiler that would hint as to how much the Cd dropped. Better still would be fuel economy ratings for otherwise identical models.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
aerohead (12-03-2016)
Old 11-29-2016, 08:59 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,075

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,902
Thanked 2,560 Times in 1,586 Posts
Try searching for kamm back or kammback and read about what others have done on here.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
aerohead (12-03-2016)
Old 11-29-2016, 09:33 AM   #4 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
If the factories wanted an aero benefit, the spoiler would be larger. They're looking for styling and an easy way to mount the third brake light.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2016, 09:50 AM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Been looking at kammbacks but not prepared to go that big just yet. The one above does look very nicely made, though. I guess even if the stock spoilers do have any aero benefit, it'll be tiny.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2016, 10:10 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Motor City
Posts: 280
Thanks: 0
Thanked 223 Times in 138 Posts
We looked at the Chevrolet Sonic Hatchback "Z-spec" wing (a Chevrolet part) for a project at work.



We could see no difference in coastdown times using a level test track in both directions.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ennored For This Useful Post:
aerohead (12-03-2016)
Old 11-29-2016, 01:45 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,500
Thanks: 8,060
Thanked 8,863 Times in 7,316 Posts
The idiom around here is 'small potatoes'. If you are worried about what you neighbors think, consider the underside — diverter/skirts/diffuser.

The worst angle for the rear glass is 30°. From Morelli's research a chamfered ring around the whole rear end is helpful.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
aerohead (12-03-2016)
Old 11-30-2016, 08:51 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,176
Thanks: 125
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Giving the air a clean sharp edge for the air to release from is important, but more important is the baby steps manufacturers are taking as the public becomes more accepting of them.

These devices are becoming larger and more elaborate ever year, only the automatic car washes will limit their scale.

I think it's a nice way to customize your car if nothing else.

To notice a real affect in a coast/roll down test, I suspect one would have to be rather large.

As a side note, the Chevy Cruze hatch went for down-force over lower Cd, must be a marketing thing.

http://www.autoblog.com/2016/01/11/2...roit-official/

Quote:
35 percent of Cruze customers are new to Chevrolet
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............

Last edited by kach22i; 11-30-2016 at 08:59 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2016, 02:53 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
gumby79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Butte, Montana
Posts: 726

little jona - '91 Dodge D 250 first gen cummins LE
Team Streamliner
90 day: 23.4 mpg (US)

Little Jona airo modded - '91 Dodge RAM 3/4 TON D 250 2×4 AUTO
Pickups
Team Cummins
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

The Salted Hound Jenny. - '87 Dodge Ram 50/D-50 5sp 4X4
90 day: 20.24 mpg (US)

Jona Allison aero - '91 Dodge Ram D-250 Le
90 day: 20.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 208
Thanked 428 Times in 279 Posts
I noticed this feature on just about every make and mode of cars trucks wagons vans . After I built my Atro Tonto. Witch has one of theas that extends 8"past the tailgate. For me the tailgate ark determined how much I was able to drop below the top of the bed(what angle I could use), and clear the gate.



Ford even took advantage of the extra space in the tailgate to add a fold out lader.
__________________
1st gen cummins 91.5 dodge d250 ,HX35W/12/6 QSV
ehxsost manafulld wrap, Aero Tonto
best tank: distance 649gps mi 24.04 mpg 27.011usg
Best mpg : 31.32mpg 100mi 3.193 USG 5/2/20


Former
'83 GMC S-15 Jimmy 2door 2wd O/D auto 3.73R&P
'79 Chevy K20 4X4 350ci 400hp msd custom th400 /np205. 7.5-new 14mpg modded befor modding was a thing
87' Hyundai Excel
83 ranger w/87 2.9 L FI2wd auto 18mpg on the floor
04 Mitsubishi Gallant 2.4L auto 26mpg
06 Subaru Forrester XT(WRX PACKAGE) MT AWD Turbocharged 18 plying dirty best of 26mpg@70mph
95Chevy Blazer 4x4 auto 14-18mpg
04 Chevy Blazer 4x4 auto 16-22mpg


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gumby79 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (12-03-2016)
Old 12-03-2016, 02:34 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,228
Thanks: 24,375
Thanked 7,357 Times in 4,757 Posts
rear

there are some rear angles to avoid which can lead to bistable flow,booming,and increased drag.It's complicated


__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
BamZipPow (12-03-2016), Fat Charlie (12-05-2016)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com