Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-23-2021, 05:04 PM   #21 (permalink)
Somewhat crazed
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,061
Thanks: 467
Thanked 1,111 Times in 980 Posts
8 yard dump truck requires a paradigm shift? Ok,,,, I guess. Looks like a F650 I saw the other day towing a 5th wheel trailer. Did need a ladder to get into the cab.

__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-23-2021, 05:32 PM   #22 (permalink)
JSH
AKA - Jason
 
JSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,500

Adventure Seeker - '04 Chevy Astro - Campervan
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 309
Thanked 2,067 Times in 1,397 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsko View Post
8 yard dump truck requires a paradigm shift? Ok,,,, I guess. Looks like a F650 I saw the other day towing a 5th wheel trailer. Did need a ladder to get into the cab.
A Class 7 truck with a gasoline engine is a pretty big shift.

The fact that Ford designed a brand new gasoline engine for the medium and heavy duty market in 2020 is a pretty big deal.

It speaks to the challenges of hitting the next level of HD emission standards with a diesel vs a gasoline engine.

Expect some surprising changes in the market mid-decade.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2021, 11:31 PM   #23 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,562
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,625 Times in 1,450 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
I was hinting a a paradigm shift in the heavy duty market that is going to surprise a whole lot of people.
Not so surprising at all, considering some European-based truck manufacturers are resorting to spark ignition and CNG/LNG on engines derived from the Diesel ones.


Quote:
I wasn't talking about "gas-station cowboys"
I know it actually makes sense for some commercial applications, but when I mentioned the Godzilla engine I had in mind the average Joe who gets a truck to use as a personal vehicle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2021, 11:56 PM   #24 (permalink)
JSH
AKA - Jason
 
JSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,500

Adventure Seeker - '04 Chevy Astro - Campervan
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 309
Thanked 2,067 Times in 1,397 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
Not so surprising at all, considering some European-based truck manufacturers are resorting to spark ignition and CNG/LNG on engines derived from the Diesel ones.
We've had factory original CNG / LNG trucks in the US market for more than a decade and they haven't ever taken off due to increased purchase price and limited fuel availability.


Natural gas truck meet 2024 emission regulations today without any sort of expensive aftertreatment.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2021, 11:23 AM   #25 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
We've had factory original CNG / LNG trucks in the US market for more than a decade and they haven't ever taken off due to increased purchase price and limited fuel availability.


Natural gas truck meet 2024 emission regulations today without any sort of expensive aftertreatment.
Cng/lng will take off in future years. Cleaner than diesel and filling stations will be more abundant, pipelines everywhere. LNG may still need to be trucked, but there are small lng systems available..
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2021, 02:27 PM   #26 (permalink)
JSH
AKA - Jason
 
JSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,500

Adventure Seeker - '04 Chevy Astro - Campervan
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 309
Thanked 2,067 Times in 1,397 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ksa8907 View Post
Cng/lng will take off in future years. Cleaner than diesel and filling stations will be more abundant, pipelines everywhere. LNG may still need to be trucked, but there are small lng systems available..
That has been the natural gas industry's statement for decades. To date it hasn't happened.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2021, 03:06 PM   #27 (permalink)
High Altitude Hybrid
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Gunnison, CO
Posts: 1,977

Avalon - '13 Toyota Avalon HV
90 day: 40.45 mpg (US)

Prius - '06 Toyota Prius
Thanks: 1,049
Thanked 543 Times in 435 Posts
Sometimes there's just one small disadvantage that doesn't let a technology take off.

CNG requires expensive tanks that hold far less fuel for a comparable gasoline tank. Not only that, the tanks require more maintenance over time.

Also, CNG tends to burn hotter under full load since there's no liquid fuel to evaporate during combustion, which can be hard on exhaust valves and such.

Fueling stations are a chicken and egg situation. A city might get away with converting their bus fleet to CNG since they only need a few stations, or maybe even just one like in my home town. But a trucking company needs several spread out over all their routes. And with the on board tanks giving each truck less range you'll need more of places to fuel than current truck stop locations. But without the trucks there's no incentive to build CNG stations, and without the stations, there's no incentive to buy CNG trucks.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Isaac Zachary For This Useful Post:
JSH (09-24-2021)
Old 09-24-2021, 07:54 PM   #28 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,562
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,625 Times in 1,450 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaac Zachary View Post
Fueling stations are a chicken and egg situation. A city might get away with converting their bus fleet to CNG since they only need a few stations, or maybe even just one like in my home town. But a trucking company needs several spread out over all their routes. And with the on board tanks giving each truck less range you'll need more of places to fuel than current truck stop locations. But without the trucks there's no incentive to build CNG stations, and without the stations, there's no incentive to buy CNG trucks.
No wonder for heavy-duty trucks I only see CNG as a supplemental fuel in my country, even though it's widely used for light-duty vehicles in cities with a good refueling infrastructure.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2021, 10:43 AM   #29 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Turku, Finland
Posts: 31

Grand Espace travel ship - '01 Renault Grand Espace
90 day: 26.56 mpg (US)

107 city slider - '10 Peugeot 107
90 day: 49.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Engine without catalyzer requirements can have better stoichiometric ratio of air.
__________________
| 107 | Espace 3 |
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2021, 10:51 AM   #30 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Turku, Finland
Posts: 31

Grand Espace travel ship - '01 Renault Grand Espace
90 day: 26.56 mpg (US)

107 city slider - '10 Peugeot 107
90 day: 49.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Toyota 1E engine at Tercel 1st gen could run 4,5 l/100km. Weight was same as 1krfe Aygo, which may run 3,5 l / 100km, without being aero.

__________________
| 107 | Espace 3 |
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com