Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-19-2011, 12:49 AM   #21 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
vacationtime247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Crescent City, CA
Posts: 284

The Toylet - '87 Toyota Supra 350 Chevy V8 / 700R4

In-Durrrr-Oh - '09 TMEC Enduro TMEC 200cc Enduro
90 day: 60.9 mpg (US)

Tem-poo - '86 Ford Tempo GL 4 Door 2.0 Liter Diesel 5 Speed
90 day: 47.52 mpg (US)

Ass Tick - '01 Pontiac Pontiac Aztek GT 5 Door

Green Baby Poop Stain - '01 Pontiac Aztek Aztek Base Model

Black Track - '01 Pontiac Aztek GT
Thanks: 14
Thanked 35 Times in 21 Posts
Had a 250 cubic inch '70 C-10 manual. Getting that '3 on the tree' manual column to shift was hard enough using the clutch. 2nd to 3rd would work without the clutch but 1st to 2nd, forget it. Truck was about as bare bones as they get. Drum brakes, manual shift, no radio, 3 speed on the column, manual windows and door locks.

Don't use the clutch in my 5 spd diesel truck. Use a 2-4 skip shift for upshifts no clutch. Seems to slide in 4th gear easy. For the RX7 it's 1 to 3 without the clutch then to 4th or 5th depending on the speed limit. Still use the clutch with the cycle but it's still new. Need to get a feel for it first.
VT247

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadeTreeMech View Post
I've driven every stick shift vehicle I've been in without the clutch, and except for a 67 Chevy C-10, none of them complained.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-20-2011, 07:13 PM   #22 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
What proof is there that properly shifting without the clutch increases wear on the transmission? I've yet to talk to anyone that said he used to shift without a clutch, but then it wore out his transmission, so he stopped doing it.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2011, 01:13 PM   #23 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 231 Times in 160 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadeTreeMech View Post
What proof is there that properly shifting without the clutch increases wear on the transmission?
Its not when you do it properly. Its when you screw up which is bound to happen.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2011, 01:21 PM   #24 (permalink)
500 Mile Metro Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sun City, CA
Posts: 183

'89 Dakota LB - blue - '89 Dodge Dakota V6 LE
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

'17 Fiat 124 - SunFiat - '17 Fiat 124 Spider Classica
90 day: 30.51 mpg (US)

'89 Metro - The Egg - '89 Geo Metro Base
90 day: 50.71 mpg (US)

'94 Alto - The Box - '94 Suzuki Alto Ce-L
90 day: 39.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConnClark View Post
Its not when you do it properly. Its when you screw up which is bound to happen.
Bingo... kinda like doing a DFCO in neutral and losing vacuum on your power brakes, then plowing thru an intersection on a red light. Almost did that a couple times. Next car I DFCO in neutral will be designed for it (no vacuum booster, disabled steering wheel lock mechanism).

IMO, until you've truly foolproofed it, some things are just best not doing since the potential risks are greater than the benefits.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2011, 03:30 PM   #25 (permalink)
Liberty Lover
 
j12piprius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: central california
Posts: 587

pris prius - '12 Toyota plug in prius
90 day: 71.09 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 83 Times in 60 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by zonker View Post
disabled steering wheel lock mechanism
I've been wondering why the steering wheel locks. Is that difficult to disable?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2011, 07:47 PM   #26 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnlvs2run View Post
I've been wondering why the steering wheel locks. Is that difficult to disable?
It's real simple.

Don't turn the key to the locked position.

Between locked and on is a position that keep the wheel unlocked, and only turns off the electrics. So go to that one.

Quote:
Its not when you do it properly. Its when you screw up which is bound to happen.
I agree. I'd certainly recommend practicing this on a beater. And I wouldn't recommend this for people who have no interest in mechanics and could care less for where the revs are likely to be close to for a certain gear at a certain speed. But then again, such people are likely to be uninterested in a stick shift to begin with.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2011, 08:16 PM   #27 (permalink)
500 Mile Metro Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sun City, CA
Posts: 183

'89 Dakota LB - blue - '89 Dodge Dakota V6 LE
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

'17 Fiat 124 - SunFiat - '17 Fiat 124 Spider Classica
90 day: 30.51 mpg (US)

'89 Metro - The Egg - '89 Geo Metro Base
90 day: 50.71 mpg (US)

'94 Alto - The Box - '94 Suzuki Alto Ce-L
90 day: 39.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnlvs2run View Post
I've been wondering why the steering wheel locks. Is that difficult to disable?
the mechanisms are in the steering column and, depending on the car, dictates the level of complication one must go through to disable it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2011, 08:20 PM   #28 (permalink)
Do more with less
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Eastern Missouri
Posts: 930

OD - '05 Ford Econoline
90 day: 18.64 mpg (US)

Joetta - '86 Volkswagen Jetta Turbo Oil Burner
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 49.71 mpg (US)

Benzilla - '85 Mercedes Benz 300D
90 day: 28.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 177 Times in 112 Posts
I don't use the clutch when upshifting my motorcycles. It is very smooth and faster than using it. I use the clutch for downshifting generally. I have shifted my manual shift cars without the clutch but I think it is generally less smooth.

I would like to have a double clutch manual shift transmission although I have never tried one.
__________________
“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.” George Orwell

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe.

The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed.”

Noah Webster, 1787
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2011, 09:57 PM   #29 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 233

Black Beauty - '13 Hyundai Elantra
Thanks: 71
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Learned to slip shift today. Tried to be gentle, little bit of clunking here and there. Fifth seems to be hardest to get into. It was the only gear I ever got any screeching from. As soon as I hear that I back off and use the clutch. It was also the only gear I wasn't able to get into perfectly smooth.

Any tips? Am I more likely having timing problems or do I need to get in just the right spot side-to-side with the shifter or something?

Last edited by justjohn; 04-26-2011 at 10:06 PM.. Reason: Got rid of bump start question after realizing that was from a different thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2011, 04:10 PM   #30 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Eau Claire, WI
Posts: 79

Escape #2 - '13 Ford Escape Titanium

C-max - '17 Ford C-Max SE
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
I asked one of the diesel mechanics here about it -
If you shift properly, there's not one tiny bit of difference using the clutch vs not using the clutch for fuel economy. note this is on big rigs, where to downshift you have to rev the engine up in neutral even when using the clutch - and rolling in neutral is a good way to get yourself killed in a big rig, so that question never came up, although the trucker term for it is Georgia Overdrive or sometimes Mexican overdrive. Gotta be on some serious medication to try that...(in a semi)

he went on to say that while you could make a case that you were causing less wear and tear on the clutch, that one shift you miss will cause 100 times the wear that a lifetime of using the clutch would cause.


I do not know if this part applies to cars - he also gave me a very strong warning against rolling down a hill in gear with the clutch depressed. He told me that due to the multiple reductions involved and no pressure on the clutch, it can actually cause the clutch to explode and send shrapnel through the cab of the truck

I'll admit to being quite guilty of not using the clutch when shifting especially in the low range gears Dont tell anyone. lol


Last edited by p38fln; 04-27-2011 at 04:18 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com