Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-21-2010, 05:51 PM   #41 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 506
Thanked 867 Times in 654 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
I was going to resist commenting on yet another inane "safety" thread... but I can't help it. When pussies go out on the road, is it in order to go somewhere, or is it to crash into something? Seriously, think of the odds.
Thats why I still drive a motorcycle, a comutacar and a subaru 360, safety.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rmay635703 For This Useful Post:
Christ (01-21-2010)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-21-2010, 09:36 PM   #42 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
I consider motorcycles (when operated responsibly) safer than cars for collision odds. Why? It's less than 1/4 the width of the average car... which means you have 75% better chance of avoiding what would have been an offset frontal impact in a car.

I actually say this about any smaller vehicle. It's smaller, which makes it harder to hit, so in the scheme of things, the idea of crash safety being half of a larger vehicle is negated by the odds of being hit also being half.

Before anyone comments on it, I already know that this is called fuzzy logic, and it's a twisted way to look at it. I don't really care, though, because in some way, it does actually make sense.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"


Last edited by Christ; 01-21-2010 at 09:51 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 10:42 AM   #43 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
The ForTwo sales have been dropping for a while here in Europe. Safety doesn't seem to be an issue for most people but stability can be. I did see one on the wet, cobbled streets of Edinburgh manage to plow straight on and took out a parked Audi when they first came out.

I had one of these for a while :

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ewoo_Matiz.jpg

which also had extremely skinny tyres and it felt unsafe on those cobbled streets. Mind you it also had a body made of such thin metal that a dent remover working on the bonnet (hood) just used his fingers, no tools!
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 03:52 AM   #44 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,864
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,683 Times in 1,501 Posts
I never got really so excited about the Smart, but I like its rear engine layout. But I wouldn't ever actually buy a Smart, I'd rather build a tricycle (which could be fitted with the 800cc diesel used in the Smart).
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 08:35 AM   #45 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Apparently (according to Car Mechanics mag which is recommissioning an old ForTwo as a project) the Smart engines are not all that good - they seem to burn a lot of oil and that leads to valves burning out and eventually a cylinder stops working and so on.

1.2 3cyl TDI would be a better option IMHO, or the more common 1.4 3cyl. They also have the option of a 6 speed in some cases and could be mid-mounted by putting the power unit at the back.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 11:47 AM   #46 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
2009 was four years ago, what are the current sales numbers like?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 12:03 PM   #47 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 62.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
Off the proverbial cliff:

Quote:
Year: U.S. Sales, Canadian Sales
2004: -----, 915
2005: -----, 4080
2006: -----, 3023
2007: -----, 2433
2008: 24,622, 3749
2009: 14,595, 2667
2010: 5927, 2019
2011: 5208, 1851
2012 YTD: 7311, 1868
Source: Smart Fortwo Sales Figures - GOOD CAR BAD CAR
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 12:36 PM   #48 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 593
Thanks: 106
Thanked 114 Times in 72 Posts
Unless you live somewhere that offers a serious parking advantage, I just don't see the point.

A Hyundai Accent is the same price, twice the seats, twice the horsepower, better highway fuel efficiency and similar city fuel efficiency, better looking and has a better warranty. A Nissan Versa sits between the two on power and fuel economy but can be had for two grand less and still has a back seat. I think both Nissan and Hyundai are brands that have proven themselves in recent years to be reliable too, so there's not much of a quality question.
__________________
Work From Home mod has saved more fuel than everything else put together.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 04:54 PM   #49 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
TBH these things were / are pretty pointless as cars. If you want / need such minimal driving and only 2 seats it seems like an MX-5 or similar would be a better bet. The For-Two coupe is nice though, still has the crappy engines and gearboxes though, and is no longer made.

__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 06:12 PM   #50 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by shovel View Post
Unless you live somewhere that offers a serious parking advantage, I just don't see the point.
Pretty much. Only person I've ever heard of buying one lives in NYC and likes how it can be parked pretty much anywhere.

I'm in Berkeley and sometimes there are pretty tight spots that a Smart could easily get into while my (already VERY short) MR2 can't. I once found a spot that I spent maybe 3 whole minutes inching my car into, which a Smart could just drive right into. But 90% of the time I can squeeze into any reasonable gap.

If the car really needs to be small, it would seem that an old AW11 or ZZW30 MR2, any Miata, Mazda 2, Veloster, etc. would be a far better overall car at the expense of not being able to squeeze into the smallest 10 foot gaps for parking.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shakeup at Aptera? NeilBlanchard General Efficiency Discussion 34 12-21-2009 10:40 PM
US sales forecast for Smart ForTwo revised upward MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 13 11-02-2008 06:25 AM
Sales of New smart fortwo Hit 100,000 in First Year MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 7 07-07-2008 12:37 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com