Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-28-2011, 10:53 AM   #41 (permalink)
CFECO
 
CFECO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vail, AZ.
Posts: 552

X-Car - '11 Homemade 2+2

Velbly1 - '17 Toyota Camery XSE
90 day: 29 mpg (US)

Velbly2 - '13 Toyota Tundra
90 day: 18.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 60 Times in 56 Posts
$2.9 million? I was trying to get $300,000 to build my Auto X-Prize car, with a $5 million return, and got no takers, but I am not in the big money business community either.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-28-2011, 11:39 AM   #42 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 356

Silver Turtle - '02 Ford Focus Zx3
90 day: 38.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CFECO View Post
$2.9 million? I was trying to get $300,000 to build my Auto X-Prize car, with a $5 million return, and got no takers, but I am not in the big money business community either.
Exactly. Although I do agree, R&D costs a lot. However, for $2.9 i don't want a conversion, I want a complete car with near production quality (maybe 30% of the way there to production).

Really the thing that insulted me the most was their "new technology" that would solve the hydrogen embrittlement problem. They said that they could not tell me because they haven't patented it yet. So two problems, 1) why are they asking for money when they don't even have the patent on that yet? 2) But most importantly, it really insulted me.

Why would I go out, get money from investors with whom I have great relationships with, and not know what I am selling? If their idea is SO great, they shouldn't even need me because the product would be selling itself. However, its not (at least as far as I know they haven't raised a single dime- although other investors have allegedly 'committed to $600,000 - right, we all know how that goes).
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2011, 10:01 AM   #43 (permalink)
CFECO
 
CFECO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vail, AZ.
Posts: 552

X-Car - '11 Homemade 2+2

Velbly1 - '17 Toyota Camery XSE
90 day: 29 mpg (US)

Velbly2 - '13 Toyota Tundra
90 day: 18.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 60 Times in 56 Posts
So, if you know investors who are interested in the automotive field, would they be interested in funding start-up of a new line of 100 mpg cars, based on the same platform, like the original VW? I will start a new thread, with the details of my plan in the next few days. Of course the $5 million X-Prize is off the table now.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2011, 12:34 PM   #44 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by basslover911 View Post
Exactly. Although I do agree, R&D costs a lot. However, for $2.9 i don't want a conversion, I want a complete car with near production quality (maybe 30% of the way there to production).

Really the thing that insulted me the most was their "new technology" that would solve the hydrogen embrittlement problem. They said that they could not tell me because they haven't patented it yet. So two problems, 1) why are they asking for money when they don't even have the patent on that yet? 2) But most importantly, it really insulted me.

Why would I go out, get money from investors with whom I have great relationships with, and not know what I am selling? If their idea is SO great, they shouldn't even need me because the product would be selling itself. However, its not (at least as far as I know they haven't raised a single dime- although other investors have allegedly 'committed to $600,000 - right, we all know how that goes).
Precisely. If an inventor has the capital he does not need investors. Of course invention itself is not the kind of effort that increases ones net worth. Countless numbers of inventors have died in relative poverty only to have their efforts see fruition when capital came into the equation.

Once empirical proof of the concept allows the transition to a real tested machine of superior efficiency, then there is little need for capital to continue the process. Investors will line up and compete for the privilege of ownership of the new machine that easily proves to be superior to everything that preceded it.

The difference between Rudolf Diesel and Edison was capital. Both of their efforts proved to be fantastic advancements over the previous status quo.

Diesel died mysteriously on a ferry at night. Edison became one of the most successful inventors.

The most basic requirement of my design was that it would provide a INEXPENSIVE improvement to the status quo. 25% fewer parts per vehicle means lower manufacturing costs. It's easy to make a better car without considering the cost of the finished product, but if you can beat the price of any cheap car now and provide close to 100% improvement in fuel mileage, you don't even need to try to sell the finished product. With a world market for manufacturing and sales of cars there will always be one company that can see the potential and build the product.

regards
Mech

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com