Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-18-2012, 02:53 PM   #41 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
They're very handsome cars, along with the first gen "hakosuka" (Say ha KOH s'ka). Find both in Hot Wheels form at your nearest big box store!

__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-18-2012, 02:55 PM   #42 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I (mis)spelled it bozo-suk-o on purpose, and I also thought I was pretty dang clever doing so.

The Skyline is pretty sweet tho'!
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
chumly (11-27-2013)
Old 01-18-2012, 03:43 PM   #43 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 102

Project EconoPolo - '04 Volkswagen Polo Twist TDi
90 day: 48.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 61 Times in 24 Posts
Well I modelled 3 holes into my 1:1 scale 3d model of my car, and ran CFD on it. The holes cut through the bumper and come out in the space behind it which catches some airflow near the spare wheel. The colour contours show air velocity at the back of the car.

Forgive me if I don't rush out and grab a drill - can't see much of a difference.

If anything, the top model (with the holes) appears to have a larger area of low velocity air - hence more drag.
__________________
Viio
Amateur SolidWorks Flow Simulator

Link to my Project EconoPolo (aeromodding a VW)
  Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to viio For This Useful Post:
BamZipPow (01-24-2012), Blacktree (01-18-2012), KamperBob (01-24-2012), kurzer (01-25-2012), renault_megane_dci (07-25-2014)
Old 01-18-2012, 06:08 PM   #44 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Blacktree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 258

The Prius Experiment - '07 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 58.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 53
Thanked 167 Times in 110 Posts
Wow, you actually took the time to make a computer model. That's pretty awesome!
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 10:12 AM   #45 (permalink)
Recreation Engineer
 
KamperBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Somewhere USA
Posts: 525

Black Stallion - '02 Toyota Tundra 4WD xCab

Half Pint - '06 Yamaha XT225
Thanks: 333
Thanked 138 Times in 103 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by viio View Post
Well I modelled 3 holes into my 1:1 scale 3d model of my car, and ran CFD on it. The holes cut through the bumper and come out in the space behind it which catches some airflow near the spare wheel. The colour contours show air velocity at the back of the car.

Forgive me if I don't rush out and grab a drill - can't see much of a difference.

If anything, the top model (with the holes) appears to have a larger area of low velocity air - hence more drag.
If you look at pressure I'd expect suction effect across the back. If you look at flow I'd expect characteristic eddy currents to balance boundary conditions with forward flow in the center. Hard to imagine high enough volume of airflow crammed under any car for wake filling in the rear. Bumper holes in the center likely just fuel parasitic eddies. In a fair fight I'd expect a negative return at the pump. It's all conjecture of course. But that's fun too.
__________________
Recreation Engineer
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 01:20 PM   #46 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by viio View Post
Well I modelled 3 holes into my 1:1 scale 3d model of my car, and ran CFD on it. The holes cut through the bumper and come out in the space behind it which catches some airflow near the spare wheel. The colour contours show air velocity at the back of the car.

Forgive me if I don't rush out and grab a drill - can't see much of a difference.

If anything, the top model (with the holes) appears to have a larger area of low velocity air - hence more drag.
How representative is your model to the under side of your car? Can we see a view from the bottom of the car to see what the pressure is like on the front of the bumper near the holes?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 01:51 PM   #47 (permalink)
PSmodder lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chino
Posts: 1,605
Thanks: 26
Thanked 908 Times in 522 Posts
My concern is that your model does not recreate the undercarriage structures. The models seen are comparable to vehicles with flat belly pans. There is no turbulent flow swirling underneath to supposedly escape through those speed holes, hence no difference in your comparison models. By creating 'holes' it creates more turbulent flow @ the back. A sealed bumper would preserve a cushion or separation bubble that would allow under airflow move smoother. An aerodynamic analogy but inverted is the proven advantage of a closed tailgate than an open tailgate of a pickup truck.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to botsapper For This Useful Post:
aerohead (01-24-2012), Sven7 (01-27-2012), wdb (02-02-2012)
Old 01-27-2012, 03:43 PM   #48 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 76
Thanks: 14
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
Some of the people laughing at "speed holes" are showing a degree of ignorance of high-level import drag racing. There are tons of VERY fast (think 8-10 second 1/4 mile with FWD) cars out there with so called "speed holes" in the rear bumper. I'd have to imagine that it's a car-by-car thing though. Many cars would probably see losses.









GO-AUTOWORKS.COM Rear Diffusers, Splitters, Front Ends and Carbon components

from the thread below
Quote:
on the older civics, air would catch on the rear bumper since it was open to the air moving underneath the car. Putting holes in the rear bumper would alleviate this problem. Of course a full diffuser would work better but that requires some decent skills with your hands and machinery.
rear bumper diffuser - 8th Generation Honda Civic Forum

another thread on the topic:

rear bumper holes? - Honda-Tech







There are certainly better solutions, but for CHEAP and within certain rules, it does have benefit.
__________________
2001 Prius - 170,000 KM - just got it (no consistent FE numbers yet)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2012, 04:37 PM   #49 (permalink)
PSmodder lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chino
Posts: 1,605
Thanks: 26
Thanked 908 Times in 522 Posts
A tasteful application of speed holes...and supercharger. Because 454 Cubic Inches Just Isn’t Enough: AMC Marlin Racer Gets Twin Superchargers | The Truth About Cars
The history of speed holes, perforations & louvering came from the aircraft industry and the hot rod culture, either to lighten the oa weights, cooling and for the cool factor. Today its still for the cool factor.
http://www.bearmetalkustoms.com/imag...mpledie002.jpg
http://www.littlemansspeedandfabrica...ication/06.jpg
http://image.hotrod.com/f/34824477+w...rt_rat_rod.jpg
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to botsapper For This Useful Post:
mcrews (01-27-2012)
Old 01-27-2012, 06:40 PM   #50 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Some of the people laughing at "speed holes" are showing a degree of ignorance of high-level import drag racing.
Hah- spose I'm one of those!

FYI I'm fully aware of these racers, and just because they have these holes doesn't make them less stupid. The premise is just as faulty on the track as it is on the street.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com