Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-27-2012, 09:21 PM   #51 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnunit View Post
Some of the people laughing at "speed holes" are showing a degree of ignorance of high-level import drag racing. There are tons of VERY fast (think 8-10 second 1/4 mile with FWD) cars out there with so called "speed holes" in the rear bumper. I'd have to imagine that it's a car-by-car thing though. Many cars would probably see losses.


GO-AUTOWORKS.COM Rear Diffusers, Splitters, Front Ends and Carbon components

from the thread below


rear bumper diffuser - 8th Generation Honda Civic Forum

another thread on the topic:

rear bumper holes? - Honda-Tech







There are certainly better solutions, but for CHEAP and within certain rules, it does have benefit.
I don't see anyone proving their theory. Everyone says air catches in the bumper because they don't know about the aero template type things. There's no way the airflow is making a 30* turn upward after the rear axle to catch on the bumper. I'll bet you they're just adding to the turbulent mess down there.

Still, if someone can find ABA or wind tunnel calibrated results I'm open to seeing them. I'm just not yet convinced by street racer logic. If it really worked wouldn't "speed holes" be in the "65+ efficiency mods" in the header of this website? Perhaps they haven't been proven to work...

__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-28-2012, 10:16 AM   #52 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Canton, MI
Posts: 31

Casey - '11 Mazda 2 Touring
90 day: 46.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
I saw a Tesla in the parking lot at work yesterday and I noticed a sort of mesh on the lower rear bumper. I thought it was speed holes at first but I think what it was instead was a way to have the underbody turn up like an aerofoil and still retain that traditional rear bumper look.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 03:39 PM   #53 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,256
Thanks: 24,382
Thanked 7,359 Times in 4,759 Posts
Subaru 1986

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven7 View Post
I don't see anyone proving their theory. Everyone says air catches in the bumper because they don't know about the aero template type things. There's no way the airflow is making a 30* turn upward after the rear axle to catch on the bumper. I'll bet you they're just adding to the turbulent mess down there.

Still, if someone can find ABA or wind tunnel calibrated results I'm open to seeing them. I'm just not yet convinced by street racer logic. If it really worked wouldn't "speed holes" be in the "65+ efficiency mods" in the header of this website? Perhaps they haven't been proven to work...
Subaru published an SAE Paper on the development of their Cd 0.29 XT sport coupe in 1986.
Lowering the bottom of the rear bumper,and floor of the trunk even with the belly of the car was one of their modifications to achieve lower drag.
Without the air-tightness of the bumper facia,their efforts would be scuttled.
Now if you want to run ductwork through this region with high static pressure,electric tube-axial fans,down to the belly diffuser,well then you're going to see an improvement up to a certain velocity,as Ferrari is demonstrating with their 599XX racer.
But in a 'passive' context,one should be rewarded only with higher drag.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
Sven7 (01-28-2012)
Old 11-20-2013, 03:25 PM   #54 (permalink)
Diesel FTW
 
PAFirefighter11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Flourtown, PA | Bethany, DE
Posts: 91

Golf TDI - '03 Volskwagen Golf TDI GL
90 day: 44.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Bumping an old thread.. what about this though?

__________________
-Rick R
-'03 Volkswagen Golf TDI (49.9 MPG - Stock with Eco Friendly Tires
-'98 Jeep Grand Cherokee 5.9L - 32" MTZ's, 4.5" lift (11.5 MPG)
-'98 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am WS7 5.7L (22 MPG)
-'01 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am WS6 5.7L (22 MPG)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2013, 03:30 PM   #55 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 102

Project EconoPolo - '04 Volkswagen Polo Twist TDi
90 day: 48.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 61 Times in 24 Posts
Downforce definitely. Drag I'm not sure about.
__________________
Viio
Amateur SolidWorks Flow Simulator

Link to my Project EconoPolo (aeromodding a VW)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2013, 08:30 PM   #56 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 142

Cinco The Miata - '90 Mazda Miata
Team Mazda
Sports Cars
90 day: 36.13 mpg (US)

Oscar Wilde - '02 Honda Metropolitan
Motorcycle
90 day: 94.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 27 Times in 20 Posts
My Miata track racer friends all like to cut the bottom of their back bumpers off. Some remove the rear bumper all together. Supposedly this is netting them faster speeds on the straights.




__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2013, 12:42 AM   #57 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 568
Thanks: 1
Thanked 73 Times in 58 Posts
If the rear bumper cover was acting as a drag chute, and you cut holes in said drag chute, you'd probably reduce drag. So, "speed holes" may be a perverse way to partially correct poor design.

Better not to have a drag chute, but using an undertray or such to smoothe the airfow.

And, start with a decent plastic garden edging air dam in the front, to keep the draggy air from clogging up the underside of the car in the first place.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2013, 11:21 AM   #58 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,178
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blacktree View Post
Some of the exotic sports cars have air vents in the rear bumper area. But those cars have the engine in back, and are venting air from the engine bay. This is probably where the ricers draw their inspiration. But your average commuter car doesn't have an engine bay in back, to draw air from.
Exactly, yet another example of Porsche envy.

Drilling holes to remove weight. - Pelican Parts Technical BBS


Of course you can drill out any car to make it lighter, quite a few examples in this thread below (start at page-1).

Looking for ideas and/or pictures of drilled out parts - Page 3 - Pelican Parts Technical BBS
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2013, 02:25 PM   #59 (permalink)
Lots of Questions
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Jose
Posts: 665

Motor-Rolla - '01 Toyota Corolla LE
Team Toyota
90 day: 28.3 mpg (US)

Gaia - '99 Toyota 4Runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 19.78 mpg (US)

Gaia - Round 2 - '99 Toyota 4runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 17.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 343
Thanked 101 Times in 79 Posts
So I was going to post this in a new thread, but then this one popped up.

Do these count as air holes?

__________________
Don't forget to like our Facebook page!




Best EM Quotes:
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
It has been said, that if you peel the duct tape back on Earth's equator, you'll find that the two hemispheres are held together with J B Weld.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan9 View Post
subscribed with a soda.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
If you're burning,and someone throws gasoline on you,there will be a localized cooling effect, but you're still on fire.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2013, 03:57 PM   #60 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,256
Thanks: 24,382
Thanked 7,359 Times in 4,759 Posts
though?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PAFirefighter11 View Post
Bumping an old thread.. what about this though?

It's the 'look.'
If you're a B-Spec racer and you actually do track time,where down-force can reduce orbits on the course,well then you'd see a benefit.
For fuel economy the lowest drag diffuser is at a 2.5-degree up sweep.Nothing steeper.It's not sexy but it's good science.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
AntiochOG (11-23-2013), rumdog (04-20-2015)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com