Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-04-2008, 04:30 PM   #61 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,312
Thanks: 24,439
Thanked 7,386 Times in 4,783 Posts
moving ground floor

Quote:
Originally Posted by ebacherville View Post
so what your saying is I need to build a big treadmill in my wind tunnel... ill get right on that
I've got an older SAE paper from some of the big-dogs.They did tunnel testing with and without the moving ground floor and results were so close,they deemed the added expense and trouble not worth the effort.The difference in drag associated with the stationary vs. rolling wheels could hardly be discerned from the signal-to-noise ratio at the tunnel floor.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-04-2008, 04:54 PM   #62 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
ttoyoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: boston ma
Posts: 381
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
aerohead,
Thanks for the info that the difference is small. Do you know if they were testing changes with the tires rotaing, or the floor boundary layer, or both?

Chris D.,
The velocity profile of the oncoming air is different in the two cases.
When a car moves thru still air on the road, The velocity of that still air is zero (obviously) no matter what the height from the road. The car moves at velocity x thur an air stream of uniform velocity zero, no matter what the height of the air above the ground is.

When air is blown at velocity x by a stationary car, the air velocity is as desired (velocity x) at some distance from the floor, but the air velocity must decrease as you measure closer and closer to the floor.. There is a boundary layer at the floor where the air velocity is not as fast as the rest of the tunnel. At the face of the floor itself, the air velocity is zero.
The question then is how thick that boundary layer is, and is it important when testing cars that have air dams and skirts which get very close to the floor and thus (presumably) into that boundary layer at the floor.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 05:03 PM   #63 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
ttoyoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: boston ma
Posts: 381
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts

http://www.aerodynwindtunnel.com/a2.html
Budget wind tunnel for the common man.
The fellow that runs the place worked on the EV1, so he knows what he is talking about.


And I see on this page
http://www.aerodynwindtunnel.com/capabilities.html
they talk about

"The integrated 2D groundplane pressure measurement system is a significant part of this data package.
Two critical systems in the test section are the contoured walls and groundplane boundary layer control. These systems have been developed to perform at or above the level of any current full-scale wind tunnel. "
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 07:05 PM   #64 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 204

- - '10 Toyota Prius III w/Navi
Thanks: 4
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Hmm,

Seems if you had the wind speed profile versus elevation from the floor up, one could then estimate how far up to lift the car during its test to replicate the moving ground. Of course not ever had Fluid Dynamics, I would not where to begin quantitatively to do this, however.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 02:31 AM   #65 (permalink)
EcoModding Seige Tank
 
digitaldissent's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 159

yarii - '07 Toyota Yaris 4dr (auto)
90 day: 41.37 mpg (US)

Bullet Bill - '07 Toyota Yaris 2dr hatch
90 day: 36.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
Its a good question and all I can do is relate what I experienced with the CRX.Michelin was touting their Green-X tire in the mid-nineties.Claims were maybe 4-5 % better mpg.They were not available in 13-inch wheel,so $1,000 later I had a set of 14-inch alloy wheels off a CRX Si and Michelin's new wonder donuts.The whole thing was a bust! I never experienced better mpg,either with the low-rolling-resistance of the tires,nor the reduced inertia of the lighter alloy wheels.The tires did have excellent wet and dry traction,not a bad reason to have them,but never delivered on the mpg promise.So all I can say to you is that the experiment didn't work for me.As to the wheel-covers,I did a post installment on Wheels/tires/wheel-covers.It may have some data for you to think about as to what you might expect from a set "of MOONS".Hope it helps,Phil.

After doing allot of reading it looks like factory alloys are heavier than steel wheels on most cars. For example the Yaris steel wheel is 15lbs while the alloy is 17.5lbs. Wonder what the alloys weighed you got? probably heavy.

I guess I assumed in the first post that alloys would be lighter and they can be but in much more pricey aftermarket selections. Plus the tire itself seems to weight different amounts depending on the brand and model.

As it looks like ChrisD proved, lighter wheels = better
__________________

I am not trying to save the planet, just trying to hurt it a little less

Yaris build thread

what is... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 03:13 AM   #66 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
digitaldissent -

I have alloys but I wish I had steelies for wheel cover/racing disk mods. You can work with allows, but it's harder.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 03:19 AM   #67 (permalink)
EcoModding Seige Tank
 
digitaldissent's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 159

yarii - '07 Toyota Yaris 4dr (auto)
90 day: 41.37 mpg (US)

Bullet Bill - '07 Toyota Yaris 2dr hatch
90 day: 36.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I wish I had both I would really like to see the difference

__________________

I am not trying to save the planet, just trying to hurt it a little less

Yaris build thread

what is... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Old school Honda/Enkei 13" alloys, super light fellfrosch7 For Sale 4 02-08-2008 10:33 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com