Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-09-2010, 01:15 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Toledo
Posts: 20

Silver Scrapper - '02 Toyota Corolla CE
90 day: 32.64 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Strikingly innovative engine technology

I briefly read about the Coates Spherical Rotary Valve system about 6 years ago and was only mildly interested at the time. A good friend of mine recently sent me a link to this website because he was thinking about modifying his Pontiac Fiero V6 with the system and I totally forgot about the entire thing up to that point. If all the claims are true, could you really modify your engine to that much higher level of efficiency? Here's the link to the website, I figured all you guys would be the best qualified to investigate and analyse the pros and cons of this system. Thanks a ton!!!!

Welcome to Coates International Ltd.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-09-2010, 01:40 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
vtec-e's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 507

De Yaris - '04 toyota yaris T2
90 day: 69.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 111
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
I came across that system a few years ago but nothing seems to have come of it. But if you get them to make onr to suit your car and you install it, let us know!
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2010, 01:58 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Safety Harbor, FL
Posts: 119

Lil Sulf - '94 Toyota Corolla
Team Toyota
90 day: 47.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I don't know why any major car company doesn't have something like this if it's as good as they say it is. Sounds like snake oil, or something wrong with Coates selling the tech.
__________________

And that's without a Scangauge o.O
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2010, 02:09 PM   #4 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 530 Times in 356 Posts
vtec-e -

Quote:
Originally Posted by vtec-e View Post
I came across that system a few years ago but nothing seems to have come of it. But if you get them to make onr to suit your car and you install it, let us know!
I agree. I keep seeing all these neato designs but none of them seem to make it to the mainstream, or even as standalone generators.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2010, 06:44 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Zerohour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 314

Pooparu - '01 Subaru Outback Limited
90 day: 28.12 mpg (US)

Cop Car - '94 Chevy Caprice Interceptor 9C1
Last 3: 18.48 mpg (US)

Mini - '11 Mini Cooper
90 day: 37.63 mpg (US)

Gramps - '95 Subaru Legacy Postal
90 day: 23.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 17 Times in 10 Posts
Manufacturing a prototype is expensive, developing and and manufacturing an engine is mega-expensive. And with any new combination you not just building an engine, you then need to design around that engine, including accessories, transmission, suspension, chassis. Its far more complex to build a car than most people consider. The technology has to be proven before it can be used, and then needs to be engineered to hell and back to be even a limited quantity vehicle.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2010, 07:12 PM   #6 (permalink)
n00b.... sortof..
 
d0sitmatr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 345

silver fire - '03 Mazda Protege5
90 day: 32.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
I saw this a little over a year ago on a different forums.
I did a search on here and it was brought up a couple times on these forums, but from what I can tell nothing was ever proved or dis-proved.
I think I remember someone saying the entire project has been pretty much scrapped for 1 reason or another, but as its been a while, dont quote me on that.
__________________
~Mike

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2010, 09:49 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Toledo
Posts: 20

Silver Scrapper - '02 Toyota Corolla CE
90 day: 32.64 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
It just seems to me that this isn't even as radical a thing as the Wankel Rotary engine and that's seeped it's way into cars ages ago. It DOES just seem too good to be true and I think there is a myriad of reasons why no car manufacturer has pick it up yet. I'd just love to see what it could do for my mpg!

According to their news website they seem to be in the phase of producing natural gas generators right now instead of focusing on cars

The official Coates International NEWS WEB SITE.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2010, 02:44 AM   #8 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
I've read about them for years and years too. I have no trouble believing their claims to increased power, and I can see small gains in efficiency (most pumping losses will still be there on a gas engine due to the throttle plate at anything other than WOT but there should be some gains w/o poppet valves).

I think the reason they haven't caught on is problems with sealing. Cylinder pressure forces the poppet valves shut and helps the intake charge from leaking past the valve. With these spherical valves, it appears the cylinder pressure tries to push the valve off it's seat and leak. I never see anything saying how long their engines last and how reliable they are.

Mike
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2010, 03:55 AM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Jack
 
nimblemotors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 335
Thanks: 12
Thanked 58 Times in 40 Posts
This is true, but if the technology really works and is that much better, then it can be used in other applications than a car, such as the one they have built for a standalone generator. If it really increases fuel efficiency, it would have a significant value in this application as the cost of generating the electricity would be less, a direct measurable effect.
I didn't see any actual comparison data with their generator vs a traditional poppet valve engine for fuel efficiency.
Some of the benefit of smaller engine size and less noise and higher rpm, wouldn't be of value as a generator, only for a car.

There are actually lots of alternative engine designs, and the fact is the traditional piston engine is horrible and its not hard to improve upon it, but they have improved them for decades and its the evil they know.
EVs are going to replace them eventually for cars anyway...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerohour View Post
Manufacturing a prototype is expensive, developing and and manufacturing an engine is mega-expensive. And with any new combination you not just building an engine, you then need to design around that engine, including accessories, transmission, suspension, chassis. Its far more complex to build a car than most people consider. The technology has to be proven before it can be used, and then needs to be engineered to hell and back to be even a limited quantity vehicle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2010, 09:58 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

RaceJeep - '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 13.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
Chances are, it's a combination of reasons why it's not mainstream. It probably doesn't help all that much, and manufacturers have likely not been able to build cost-effective, reliable engines based on it yet.

__________________
Call me crazy, but I actually try for mpg with this Jeep:



Typical driving: Back in Rochester for school, driving is 60 - 70% city
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Efficiency Improvements for Internal Combustion Engines NeilBlanchard General Efficiency Discussion 251 03-22-2011 11:12 AM
The future car. user removed General Efficiency Discussion 2 10-03-2009 08:24 PM
Insulated Engine? bennelson EcoModding Central 17 12-11-2008 01:10 PM
Coasting experiment: engine on VS engine off on a fixed route = 12.9% gain MetroMPG Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 6 02-22-2008 08:38 AM
Basic EcoDriving Techniques and Instrumentation SVOboy Instrumentation 2 11-17-2007 11:38 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com