Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-07-2009, 07:40 AM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
The Atomic Ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 535

Overland - '24 Nissan Versa S 5MT
90 day: 36.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
Suspension theory

I've read here that while perfectly aligned wheels front and back might be good for FE, they generally make for a squirrelly-handling car.

Am I remembering correctly, that a car will generally track straight, but will squirrel in turns, or is it that the car won't track straight with perfect alignment?

What I'm brain-storming here, is for my future not-even-on-the-drawing-board electric car, a suspension system wherein all adjustable elements, (toe/camber/caster), are controlled with stepper motors by a computer, to maximize efficiency in straight line AND maximize stability when making the tires screech.

Compromise is such a filthy concept.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-07-2009, 09:59 AM   #2 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
You need to do a lot more reading on suspension geometry.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 07:24 PM   #3 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I have read about proposed "active alignment" for heavy semi-trucks. I generally don't think the complexity is necessary on a light vehicle.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 08:19 PM   #4 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
there's: toe, caster and camber...which do you plan on "adjusting" while driving?

...some roads have crowns, others don't and some have banks while others are flat.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 08:58 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Victoria , Australia.
Posts: 499
Thanks: 20
Thanked 46 Times in 33 Posts
You can get the alignment you want with out stepper motors which add costs , weight and complexity not to mention trying to sell a car fitted with them.

Complianced bushings do all that you need and keep the geometry where it should be.
Have a look at the "Weissach axle" from Porsche for an example.

I agree with TJTS1...do more reading about suspension geometry first and especially the forces involved.

Pete.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2009, 12:37 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pawlng
Posts: 21

Push - '03 Honda Civic Si (Ep3)
90 day: 28.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I once saw a setup for an Ep3 (honda civic Si 2002-2005) when the top hats (the part that the strut and chassis touch at the top) were on this weird bar setup with the steering rack.

It gave the wheels more camber in a turn. (sort of like camber steering on motorcycles.) But I haven't heard anything for years.

Never heard of any suspension changing thing with motorized parts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2009, 09:33 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
Zero toe angle will give you the least amount of rolling resistance. Something near zero camber as well, and I don't think caster angle makes any real difference.

Zero static toe will tend to make your car wander a little bit, as the compliance in the bushings of the non-driven wheels will tend to lead to toe-out, which is dynamically unstable. If you've driven a car with toe-out, you probably know the feeling--the ability to change lanes without realizing it when you look down to change the radio station.

Static toe-out is even more squirrelly, as you get even more toe-out at speed.

Even with zero toe-out when the car is at speed makes for a car that tends to wander and hunt. It will like to follow any grooves or ruts in the road as well.

I don't think that having dynamic toe-change with speed will be worth the complexity. Having toe angles that change as the suspension compresses (presumably from the car going around a corner) can be; that's more or less what the aforementioned Weissach axle does. There are some other designs that have similar features, like the "passive rear steering" in the 1988 CRX Si models. Though it seems like that was done for less stability and more agility, unlike the Weissach axle which was designed for more stability.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2009, 09:44 PM   #8 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...caster is "how far" the tire patch contacts the road AHEAD/BEHIND the projected pivot/axle.

...if the contact point is right under the pivot or behind it, you end up with the "grocery-cart" vibrations.

...if the contact point is too far forward, the tire edges will be scrubbed with every light turn, which definitely will kill FE (and the tires!).

Last edited by gone-ot; 11-09-2009 at 10:55 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2009, 10:50 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
The original Insight has zero toe. I don't find its handling squirrely at all, but quite light & responsive. But I admit I do prefer & am used to sports car handling. The only problem is that it does tend to wander on grooved pavement, though I don't know whether that's due to the toe-in, the tires, or the light weight.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2009, 11:21 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Victoria , Australia.
Posts: 499
Thanks: 20
Thanked 46 Times in 33 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...caster is "how far" the tire patch contacts the road AHEAD/BEHIND the projected pivot/axle.

...if the contact point is right under the pivot or behind it, you end up with the "grocery-cart" vibrations.

...if the contact point is too far forward, the tire edges will be scrubbed with every light turn, which definitely will kill FE (and the tires!).
I hate to indulge in pedantic semantics here...
Caster is the ANGLE formed by a line passing through the upper and lower suspension pivot points at the wheel hub when viewed from the side.

The distance between the point where this line meets the road surface and a vertical line drawn from the wheel centre to the centre of the contact patch (also when viewed from the side) is the "trail" distance.

The resultant side effects , resulting some times in "interesting" handling , mentioned above are both correct.

Pete.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DIY suspension generator / regenerator Daox EcoModding Central 60 08-09-2010 03:09 AM
Touchy subject - Big Bang Theory (not the religious argument) robchalmers General Efficiency Discussion 11 08-26-2009 06:27 PM
Variable air suspension Piwoslaw EcoModding Central 22 04-03-2009 11:52 PM
Metro Suspension Parts pint EcoModding Central 17 08-14-2008 11:38 AM
Suspension Dams on Production Cars Arminius Aerodynamics 19 08-13-2008 03:49 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com