Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-24-2011, 07:58 PM   #1 (permalink)
Coroplast Engineer
 
slowbro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: suburban Chicago
Posts: 80

AV - '04 Chevy Aveo sedan - not LS
90 day: 34.28 mpg (US)

Jolteon - '00 Honda Insight MT
Team Honda
90 day: 77.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 27
Thanked 25 Times in 11 Posts
Testing procedure

What would be the best testing procedure to find significant results from aero mods? The other day, I was trying to test some mods made out of cardboard and duct-tape, and the results were inconclusive. I did A-B-A testing with the B runs as the mod and A being no change to the vehicle and did two A runs, followed by three B runs, and ending with two A runs. The changes in fuel economy seemed negligible and inconsistent. I think the natural variability in each of the runs caused there to be no significant difference. Would coast-down testing be better than just watching the fuel economy display (Scanguage) while holding a constant speed? Would I be able to see results better? Is there another way to test? I don't have cruise control in my car so the speed that I hold while using the fuel economy method is only as good as my ability to slightly alter my foot position as needed.
If someone could detail coast-down testing in their response, I would greatly appreciate it.

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tango Charlie
You know how when you buy a car, and then you start noticing how many others there are on the road? Yeah, that doesn't happen with a 1st gen Insight.


AV Build Thread
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-24-2011, 08:47 PM   #2 (permalink)
Dartmouth 2010
 
SVOboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447

Vegan Powa! - '91 Honda CRX DX
Team Honda
90 day: 66.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 92
Thanked 122 Times in 90 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SVOboy Send a message via MSN to SVOboy Send a message via Yahoo to SVOboy
What kind of speed were you driving at for the runs? Things like wind, slight undetectable grades on different parts of roads, etc, will make testing difficult. You should try a high speed coast-down test also, where you get to a high speed, go neutral, and time the drop from X speed to Y speed.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2011, 09:22 PM   #3 (permalink)
Coroplast Engineer
 
slowbro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: suburban Chicago
Posts: 80

AV - '04 Chevy Aveo sedan - not LS
90 day: 34.28 mpg (US)

Jolteon - '00 Honda Insight MT
Team Honda
90 day: 77.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 27
Thanked 25 Times in 11 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVOboy View Post
What kind of speed were you driving at for the runs? Things like wind, slight undetectable grades on different parts of roads, etc, will make testing difficult. You should try a high speed coast-down test also, where you get to a high speed, go neutral, and time the drop from X speed to Y speed.
I was going at 55 mph. The average wind speed was 8 mph. I think the wind might have been a huge factor.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tango Charlie
You know how when you buy a car, and then you start noticing how many others there are on the road? Yeah, that doesn't happen with a 1st gen Insight.


AV Build Thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 08:13 AM   #4 (permalink)
Dartmouth 2010
 
SVOboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447

Vegan Powa! - '91 Honda CRX DX
Team Honda
90 day: 66.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 92
Thanked 122 Times in 90 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SVOboy Send a message via MSN to SVOboy Send a message via Yahoo to SVOboy
I'm sure wind was a factor, but higher speeds could also be helpful. 75mph! For science!

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com