07-28-2014, 03:17 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 54
Thanks: 6
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by roosterk0031
|
Nifty, I stand corrected!
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2014, 03:25 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
The older Taurus/Sable wagons had third row seating but as you can see Moon Unit leaves a lot to be desired in the mpg department. I'd expect one without the hot-rod 24 valve engine to do better.
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2014, 04:34 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoWalker
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,999
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,247 Times in 1,455 Posts
|
Over here there's the Dacia Logan MCV as a relatively cheap station wagon that seats adults in the third row.
It can be had with a diesel engine too.
It is no eco wonder but certainly less thirsty than the big SUVs.
Full size 3rd row seats and even some luggage room behind them, in a car that is a lot cheaper than a VW Golf...!
In 2013 a new Logan MCV was launched and believe it or not, it has less room in the back than the old one...
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
  lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.
For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
Last edited by RedDevil; 07-28-2014 at 05:01 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2014, 04:48 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Quote:
|
In 2013 a new Logan MCV was lanunched and believe it or not, it has less room in the back than the old one...
|
I noticed the same thing about the 1st and 2nd gen Taurus/Sable wagons, according to fuelecon.gov.  |
|
|
|
|
07-28-2014, 05:57 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Not bad for a machine
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 1,024
Thanks: 279
Thanked 242 Times in 179 Posts
|
I used to get 32MPG on a 2001 dodge caravan in the rolling hills of Tennessee.
Are you trying to save money or fuel?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dirtydave For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
07-28-2014, 06:26 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,765
Thanks: 4,320
Thanked 4,473 Times in 3,438 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crasster
Mini-van's are really out of the question because anybody can "settle" for that. They are not incredibly aerodynamic. We already have a Toyota Sienna anyway, and it gets about 24 MPG if I drive it "specially".
|
This is a silly thread.
You already have the best vehicle for hauling 7 people around.
If you want to save money, then keep the vehicle you already own.
If you want to save the world by burning an insignificantly smaller amount of fuel, then don't drive.
Beyond that, you can ecomod your van by giving it some aero treatments and airing up the tires... partial grill block, camback, wheel covers, remove the roof rails, etc. I bet you could get 30mpg by doing these things. |
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
07-28-2014, 06:41 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Furry Furfag
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian
Mazda5 in only a 6-seater. 2+2+2
I have an Odyssey. The new model is rated 19/28 mpg. Which is almost as good as the pint-sized Mazda5 (22/28).
I had high hopes for the Prius v when it came out, but the 3-row option isn't offered here, only overseas. 45 mpg and 7 seats? Yes Please!
|
My parents had the V6 Odyssey for a while, and I drove it a couple times to L.A and back at 55mph and got 29 mpg. I P&G'd in the city and when I could on the freeway, that thing had insane coasting capabilities. I can imagine the 4 cylinder version would get 30+ with some aero mods and careful driving.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2014, 06:44 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Too busy for gas stations
Join Date: May 2013
Location: The intersection of TN/MS/AL
Posts: 460
Turtle - '92 Honda Civic Vx Team Honda 90 day: 67.09 mpg (US) Rolla - '10 Toyota Corolla Le Beast - '91 Chevy V2500 Bus - '01 VW Eurovan MV Speed - '93 Harley bored and storked Harley w/ turbo/ nitrous 90 day: 53.09 mpg (US) Cal - '68 Ford Mustang GT/CS
Thanks: 87
Thanked 176 Times in 114 Posts
|
Newer
Tesla Model S
R320
Middle
E300 wagon
Older
VW Eurovan diesel (Canada only)
early-mid nineties camry wagon 4cyl
Custom
Caprice wagon with 6.2L Diesel
Lower mpg
volvo v70 5speed
Sprinter
transit connect
commander crd
__________________
Shooting for 600 miles of range at 65-70 mph out of a vx.
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2014, 06:56 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 54
Thanks: 6
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by xntrx
Newer
Tesla Model S
|
Wat?!  |
|
|
|
|
07-28-2014, 07:00 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Not bad for a machine
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 1,024
Thanks: 279
Thanked 242 Times in 179 Posts
|
Yeah 30 MPG isn't impossible with a V6 mini van. Very good actually when you think how many people and how much stuff they can haul. I used to pull a 12" enclosed trailer filled with scrap metal daily and still got around 25MPG. It was way better then my 1983 ford van. 8MPG and still no power 
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
