Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-07-2009, 03:15 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 69
Thanks: 18
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Thinking out loud, large cars

I'm not sure if this is the right thread for this--if not, correct me.
Some time back I got advice here on getting a large car for comfort and safety to be used on long trips. For best FE, GMs with the 3.8 engine, and the Avalon, were recomended.
I would drive the car 5000 miles per year at most. In searching this site, I've looked at posts by bluegoat06, mevinwy, 99couch, Will and McCool, among others, and these have been very helpful.
I'm now thinking of a 2001-2003 Crown Victoria. Reviews by owners claim as much as 30 highway mpg for the base model with 2.73 gears. For me, the size is a safety advantage and while the FE would not be as good as other large cars, I feel the high depreciation and ruggedness make a Crown Vic much cheaper to get in to.
I'm considering a grill block, partial or full belly pan, and possibly rear skirts (though I don't want to change the appearance much).
Unless I've missed it, I haven't seen anything on here about FE mods to a Crown Vic.
What are your thoughts?
Thanks, Ray Mac.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-07-2009, 06:40 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Posts: 201
Thanks: 54
Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
I suppose it's not impossible to regularly get 30 MPG in a Crown Vic if you're going easy on the throttle and doing a lot of highway driving. Having had an '00 Impala for a long time, I can say that conserving momentum and avoiding city driving really was key to decent MPG in that car. The EPA says an '03 Crown Vic will get 16 city/23 highway.

Have you driven a Crown Vic before? It's always been my experience in those cars that unless you get a sport suspension (or police suspension,) they are very floaty and don't handle very well. Comfortable to drive, but in my mind, less safe, because I've always been of the school of thought that says that it is better to have a more nimble vehicle and avoid the accident in the first place instead of driving a bigger vehicle.

Personally, if I wanted another big sedan and wanted to go cheap, I'd definitely go with a FWD platform like the GM "W" body 3800 V6. The Impalas especially have depreciated a lot, and considering how many are still being used as police cruisers, I think you'll find that the cost of purchasing and maintenance is in the same ballpark as the Crown Vic.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jkp1187 For This Useful Post:
fud2468 (03-22-2011)
Old 09-07-2009, 09:29 PM   #3 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 719

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 18.97 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 61 Times in 46 Posts
if you can find an olds, they handle very well

they are comfy and pretty oh and did i mention they get good mileage? they are well built in my opinion. a lot of people around here are selling them at the ends of their driveways because they bought something newer, wish i could afford a few for parts....never know when you might smack a deer or get hit or wear something out.....

and of course for those that pull trailers....they don't mind 1,000 Lbs or 2
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to IsaacCarlson For This Useful Post:
fud2468 (03-22-2011)
Old 09-07-2009, 09:58 PM   #4 (permalink)
Left Lane Ecodriver
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257

Prius C - '12 Toyota Prius C
Thanks: 79
Thanked 286 Times in 199 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fud2468 View Post
Unless I've missed it, I haven't seen anything on here about FE mods to a Crown Vic.
What are your thoughts?
Well, there was the time I half-jokingly suggested a 2.3L Ranger engine with a 5MT would be an excellent power plant for a Crown Vic (which it would be). Strip out every semblance of comfort and luxury to save weight, fit low rolling resistance tires, simple aero mods, and an engine kill switch, and you might see MPGs in the 30's, and not just on the highway.

As for safety, there are small and mid-sized cars that do very well in laboratory tests representing one-car collisions, the most common type of crash. Yeah, a heavier car has an advantage in two-car collisions, but that advantage is gained at the expense of the occupants of the other car. Are you going to tell me your life is worth more than that of a random stranger's?

I don't need much comfort or luxury, hence cars like the Crown Vic and LeSabre don't make sense to me.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RobertSmalls For This Useful Post:
fud2468 (03-22-2011), S2k-Takara (06-26-2010)
Old 09-07-2009, 10:21 PM   #5 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: maine
Posts: 758

oldscoob - '87 subaru wagon gl/dr
90 day: 47.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 21
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
the crown vic police cruiser. p71.
16/23 is the maximum a v8 can suck down, oe never maximizes thier own v8s. one can risk the engine into much higher, but fuel injection is a hopeless slob and it may not be changeable. The modern power steering rack is a bonus. I seek them randomly all the time, the auctioned off beaten police car.
Never went through with any...but would. I am one that bent broke and magled all my cars just by existing. I am sure me inmy locale could throw out the great safety of a crown vic with the perfect omen I have. For side hits, I would keep the cop car taxi looking window seperating the front and back seats and bumper bar. And the when the fat lady in the pt cruiser decides to hit and run, I can chase it down ...
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 11:49 PM   #6 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I doubt a Vic would average anything north of 26 without lots of hypermiling. Might get lucky and hit 30 on a long trip. Downhill. With a tailwind.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 01:25 AM   #7 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
7.3 IDI fits under the hood of a C-Vic'. Well, not exactly "under" the hood, but it fits in there. You have to use a diff type of air cleaner on it, since the IDI has a 8" tall element (exaggerating) on it. You can use a modified pan from a 302 or 351 to clear the hood.

Make sure, if you get one, you get the transmission adapter plate with it. It will bolt straight to your OEM transmission. Although, you probably should upgrade that to deal w/the torque.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Christ For This Useful Post:
fud2468 (03-22-2011)
Old 09-08-2009, 01:59 AM   #8 (permalink)
herp derp Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049

Saturn-sold - '99 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 28.28 mpg (US)

Yukon - '03 GMC Yukon Denali
90 day: 13.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
find the smallest car with gm's 3800 that is comfy enough, 2000 impala should be pretty reasonably priced. then if you feel its necessary, add a roll cage, 5pt harness and put a helmet on
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 02:08 AM   #9 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Funny you mention that. I was dreaming of putting a 3800 in a CRX the other day!
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 02:31 AM   #10 (permalink)
herp derp Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049

Saturn-sold - '99 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 28.28 mpg (US)

Yukon - '03 GMC Yukon Denali
90 day: 13.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
better just bite the bullet and get a displacement on demand aluminum V8, you could probably gear one to run near idle speed at 70mph in a CRX, and only on 4cyls. 40mpg and 0-60 in 4sec

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Article: Want cars to eat less? Put 'em on a diet MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 34 07-14-2013 01:38 AM
Project: Rebuilding an '01 Honda Insight as a nonhybrid Fabio Hybrids 158 01-12-2013 11:59 AM
wheeldams - ideal average on production cars lunarhighway Aerodynamics 2 11-03-2008 12:22 PM
Big Surprise: Fuel efficient cars are holding their value better than other cars SVOboy EcoModder Blog Discussion 2 09-19-2008 08:52 AM
Large cars fud2468 EcoModding Central 42 08-30-2008 01:59 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com