Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-08-2021, 09:09 PM   #61 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Thanks for posting up your testing, as usual, Vekke. You've done of the cooler, "Mad Max" style modding and testing on this forum over the years.

One of the things that will make frontal area created by the tire different and more important than just any frontal area is the fact that it is a moving rough surface, a tread that is designed to force away fluids. The tire face must blast air both under the car and maybe a foot or more to the sides, creating an effective frontal area far larger than the face of the tire itself.

__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to California98Civic For This Useful Post:
freebeard (06-08-2021)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-08-2021, 10:02 PM   #62 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,701
Thanks: 7,777
Thanked 8,586 Times in 7,070 Posts
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2021, 04:21 AM   #63 (permalink)
-----------------
 
IRONICK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Romania
Posts: 128
Thanks: 22
Thanked 57 Times in 44 Posts
The trend is to stop using those simple deflectors in front of the wheels.
Something else is being used now, you have two examples here:





You must do the same for the rear wheels.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Audi-Q4_Sportback_e-tron-2022-1600-36.jpg
Views:	336
Size:	59.7 KB
ID:	30834   Click image for larger version

Name:	328_underbody.jpg
Views:	348
Size:	62.3 KB
ID:	30835  
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to IRONICK For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-09-2021), woodstock74 (06-14-2021)
Old 06-21-2021, 03:58 PM   #64 (permalink)
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,246

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 260
Thanked 804 Times in 392 Posts
I have now tried over 10 variations of front deflectors. So far the best two have been the triangle and the D shape deflector. D shape is the best and there is a basic shape physics backing that idea up:


That table also shows why the flat plate that car manufacturers use is not the best option. On that use its not that clear difference as that chart shows as there is the bumber blocking some of the flow making it little bit wedge in a way but still shape is shape and better is better.

That D shape in front is 0,6 to 1,0 percent better than triangle. which is 0,1 to 0,2 kWh difference in my test route.
__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast

Last edited by Vekke; 06-21-2021 at 04:08 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vekke For This Useful Post:
aerohead (07-14-2021)
Old 06-21-2021, 04:34 PM   #65 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,701
Thanks: 7,777
Thanked 8,586 Times in 7,070 Posts


That's the way I thought things should go. As I understand it, D-shaped in plan but flatted on the bottom in elevation.

But they're offset inward about half the width of the tire. Is that for the suspension area?
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2021, 04:51 PM   #66 (permalink)
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,246

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 260
Thanked 804 Times in 392 Posts
Currently D is about 15mm narrower than tire on each side. The bottom is still open, it should be closed for best effect. That D shape is tricky for that curb driving situations.

Those oem style deflectors as seen on that red car are not best imo as more air can hit the tire surface.
__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vekke For This Useful Post:
freebeard (06-21-2021)
Old 06-21-2021, 05:38 PM   #67 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,701
Thanks: 7,777
Thanked 8,586 Times in 7,070 Posts
This is my design from 2013:



It was sized for a pickup truck but the dimensions are variable. Two pieces not connected on the bottom of the U shape so the conveyor belting can deflect on road strikes.

The lower trailing edge would naturally tend toward a D-shape.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
IRONICK (06-23-2021)
Old 06-23-2021, 04:58 AM   #68 (permalink)
-----------------
 
IRONICK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Romania
Posts: 128
Thanks: 22
Thanked 57 Times in 44 Posts
The picture with the red car is from the previous model.
In my case, I did not want to cover the suspension arms with the deflector , because I have an air intake for the brakes. Especially since I use wheel covers that provide less ventilation.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2021, 05:30 AM   #69 (permalink)
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,246

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 260
Thanked 804 Times in 392 Posts
I wrote a article on linkedin conserning the topic and my findings:
__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vekke For This Useful Post:
aerohead (07-14-2021)
Old 07-16-2021, 07:39 PM   #70 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vekke View Post
I wrote a article on linkedin conserning the topic and my findings:
From the end of the article you linked in the quoted section above: "Writer of the article is a well know automotive engineer ..."

Which is the "D" shape that you identify as best? It seemed like the "D" shape was among the best but that it was equal to the "I" shape at 1.17 and the "O" shape. I must have misunderstood.

__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com