08-05-2018, 09:33 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Tire Geek
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 796
Thanks: 4
Thanked 393 Times in 240 Posts
|
Tire Fuel Effeciency Consumer Information
NHTSA (National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration) was originally supposed to publish a rule concerning the publication of rolling resistance data for tires in 2010, based on a mandate from the US Congress in 2007. There was a large problem with what they published (short version: It was unworkable!). So they went back to the drawing board.
Eventually they came back saying they would publish a rule in 2012. That date came and went.
Earlier this year I found a publication of new rules being worked on by the US Federal government:
https://www.transportation.gov/regul...nt-rulemakings
Back when I found this report, the rule of tire fuel economy had a future publication date of Aug, 2018 - that would be this month!
However, the latest report is that the rule will be published in June, 2019.
I am putting this here to remind folks (and me, too!) that there is something coming and where to go to find the status, but it appears to have been kicked down the road again.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to CapriRacer For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
08-05-2018, 09:53 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,265
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
I should have worked for the NHTSA.
|
|
|
08-05-2018, 11:12 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Cyborg ECU
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
|
Geez. I would love to have detailed standards and data published by NHTSA. Wish they would stop kicking it down the road already
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.
|
|
|
08-05-2018, 01:18 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,741
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,467 Times in 3,432 Posts
|
Seems a fairly straightforward process to define standard testing parameters such as inflation pressure, temperature, and weight load, and then measure how much energy it takes to roll the tire at a specified speed.
|
|
|
08-05-2018, 01:19 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 263
Thanks: 244
Thanked 86 Times in 61 Posts
|
Is there a euro one we can use? Years ago after seeing a few lists with tires and rr I thought we'd be so far ahead compared to where we are now.
__________________
|
|
|
08-05-2018, 03:16 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
Gooberment said the many "different" tire-testing dynamometer sites didn't match data-wise, so single data publication isn't possible.
|
|
|
08-06-2018, 09:35 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Tire Geek
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 796
Thanks: 4
Thanked 393 Times in 240 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
Seems a fairly straightforward process to define standard testing parameters such as inflation pressure, temperature, and weight load, and then measure how much energy it takes to roll the tire at a specified speed.
|
The problem isn't the test.
Among the problems was the amount of available testing facilities. The tire manufacturers said that if they tested 24/7 - and nothing else - it would take 3 years. Some said they couldn't accomplish the task unless they sacrificed some R&D testing. Some said that by the time they completed the first round of testing, there would be new models to test and they would never catch up.
|
|
|
08-06-2018, 04:47 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer
The problem isn't the test.
Among the problems was the amount of available testing facilities. The tire manufacturers said that if they tested 24/7 - and nothing else - it would take 3 years. Some said they couldn't accomplish the task unless they sacrificed some R&D testing. Some said that by the time they completed the first round of testing, there would be new models to test and they would never catch up.
|
This is why I would like this to be a voluntary standard test. For the average cheap tire who cares? I don't want to pay extra to know that it might return + or - .25 mpg compared to something else. But I'f a few companies want to produce specific higher end LRR tires then they can do the test against a standard as a marketing tool.
|
|
|
08-06-2018, 06:18 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,741
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,467 Times in 3,432 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer
The problem isn't the test.
Among the problems was the amount of available testing facilities. The tire manufacturers said that if they tested 24/7 - and nothing else - it would take 3 years. Some said they couldn't accomplish the task unless they sacrificed some R&D testing. Some said that by the time they completed the first round of testing, there would be new models to test and they would never catch up.
|
I'm ignorant when it comes to the tire industry, but it seems a simple test as I suggest, with a dynamometer measuring power required to spin a certain speed under certain load and temperature conditions; you could pretty quickly get a rough estimate of efficiency.
Or does the problem have more to do with breaking in the tire so that it performs in a consistent way?
|
|
|
08-07-2018, 04:22 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,747
Thanks: 75
Thanked 577 Times in 426 Posts
|
You'd think they'd be able to calculate it fairly closely with computer models, calculations based on tread design and material selection...
Yeah, it won't be perfect in the real world, but it ought to give an idea without the cost of testing every size of a particular tire.
|
|
|
|