Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-13-2012, 07:37 PM   #1 (permalink)
Green Turd
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Walworth wi
Posts: 14

Green turd - '93 Toyota Tercel
90 day: 36.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Red face Tire size?

Ok guys, I'm looking for tires for my wife's car. It's been very confusing. The size on the car and the plaque is 235-65-16 Walmart says it takes 215-70-16 or 235-70-16. I'm looking for something taller and skinner but can't find any thing. Which is taller 235-65-16 or 215-70-16? And why?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-13-2012, 07:42 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Oakton, VA
Posts: 189
Thanks: 1
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
215/70-R15 is slightly taller (approx .2")

the width (215) * the aspect ratio * 2 will give you the height. 215 x .70 x 2 = 301mm or 11.85"

Add that to the wheel diameter (16") to get the overall height of 27.85"
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ProDarwin For This Useful Post:
SpencersGreenTurd (01-13-2012)
Old 01-13-2012, 08:51 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
Note that those calculated sizes are "notional"--they generally reflect the actual sizes of the tires, but are not necessarily completely accurate. Usually the tire makers will give a "revs/mile" figure, to tell you how many revolutions the tire will make in one mile. Fewer revs means a taller tire, more revs means a shorter tire.

Tirerack shows the revs/mile figures for many of their tires, and those can be used as a basis for comparison.

Of course, inflation pressures, wear, and even rim width can also make some difference in that figure so even those numbers may not be absolutely precise.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 09:11 PM   #4 (permalink)
ecomonkey
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: middleburg fl
Posts: 240

silver clown - '02 toyota echo 2 door base
90 day: 47.16 mpg (US)

white ghost - '05 prius base
90 day: 47.53 mpg (US)

white pearl - '12 toyota prius base
Last 3: 45.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 33
Thanked 30 Times in 21 Posts
be carful going much taller than stock .depending on what car and what transmission,, i dont have proof but am pretty sure that taller tires took out my transmission (5speed).on my toyota echo.also if it raises the height of the car much it can hurt aerodynamics at highway speeds. overall it might help you though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 10:00 AM   #5 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 796
Thanks: 4
Thanked 393 Times in 240 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpencersGreenTurd View Post
Ok guys, I'm looking for tires for my wife's car. It's been very confusing. The size on the car and the plaque is 235-65-16 Walmart says it takes 215-70-16 or 235-70-16. I'm looking for something taller and skinner but can't find any thing. Which is taller 235-65-16 or 215-70-16? And why?
You don't want to be using the 215/70R16's. The 235/65R16's have a higher load rating and that translates into better rolling resistance - about 2% better. This is larger than the 0.6% you get with the diameter difference.

Plus, there is the safety issue using a tire with a lower load rating.

But there is another consideration. The difference between tires is an even larger affect on fuel economy. So look this over very carefully.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CapriRacer For This Useful Post:
SpencersGreenTurd (01-15-2012)
Old 01-14-2012, 01:12 PM   #6 (permalink)
OCD Master EcoModder
 
brucepick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern CT, USA
Posts: 1,936

Outasight - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 54.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 431
Thanked 396 Times in 264 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpencersGreenTurd View Post
... The size on the car and the plaque is 235-65-16 Walmart says it takes 215-70-16 or 235-70-16...
A quick rule of thumb:
If you DECREASE the first number by 10 (235 becomes 225)
you will need to INCREASE the second number by 5 (65 becomes 70).
That way your tire's outer diameter stays nearly unchanged.
You can work it the other way too, increase the first number by 10 and decrease the second by 5. The last number is the rim diameter and that must stay the same for this rule to work.

Yes a tire size calculator is more precise and more informative. But if you can carry this method in your head, it will always be there when you need it.

Try the info at TireRack.com.
Or do a web search for "tire size calculator"; I think you'll find some.
__________________
Coast long and prosper.
Driving '00 Honda Insight, acquired Feb 2016.


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 11:59 PM   #7 (permalink)
Green Turd
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Walworth wi
Posts: 14

Green turd - '93 Toyota Tercel
90 day: 36.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Looks like I got my work cut out for me. I was thinking of going smaller. Anyone have any luck with smaller lighter tires?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2012, 06:18 AM   #8 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpencersGreenTurd View Post
Looks like I got my work cut out for me. I was thinking of going smaller. Anyone have any luck with smaller lighter tires?
No.
Smaller tires make your engine have to turn faster to maintain speed.
Taller tires are the cheap easy way to alter your final drive ratio to reduce engine speed at cruise.
Now if you put taller differential gears in and smaller tires you will have something.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
SpencersGreenTurd (01-15-2012)
Old 01-15-2012, 08:00 AM   #9 (permalink)
OCD Master EcoModder
 
brucepick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern CT, USA
Posts: 1,936

Outasight - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 54.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 431
Thanked 396 Times in 264 Posts
Tire size calculator:

Tire size calculator
__________________
Coast long and prosper.
Driving '00 Honda Insight, acquired Feb 2016.


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to brucepick For This Useful Post:
SpencersGreenTurd (01-15-2012)
Old 01-15-2012, 10:41 AM   #10 (permalink)
Green Turd
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Walworth wi
Posts: 14

Green turd - '93 Toyota Tercel
90 day: 36.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks everyone, is tire stuff is difficult... I m still not sure what's the best route to take...taller tires are heavy and raise car height....skinner tiers loose load weight and cause more resistance... What I want I can't find. A LRR, light weight, tall, skinny, with a good load weight tire. I don't think one exists!

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com