05-01-2011, 07:56 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SentraSE-R
Ouch. The truth hurts. I'm now reduced to thinking that if I go through with this, the best I can expect is no net loss in mpg - if I'm lucky.
|
You're getting some pretty good mileage already with this set up
It'll get tough to improve upon that.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
05-02-2011, 12:42 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Pishtaco
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
|
Thanks. It's difficult to keep the mpgs up. I drove 200 miles to and from a car meet yesterday. I fought a 35-40 mph headwind going up, and averaged only ~37 mpg going out. I had to run lights on the way home, and averaged only 41+ mpg on the return.
__________________
Darrell
Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
|
|
|
05-02-2011, 01:41 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
500 Mile Metro Traveler
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sun City, CA
Posts: 183
Thanks: 14
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SentraSE-R
Ouch. The truth hurts. I'm now reduced to thinking that if I go through with this, the best I can expect is no net loss in mpg - if I'm lucky.
I'm in a deal for the wheels. It looks like my best option is to sell them & stick with the stockers.
|
On a small 4 cyl car of less than 2.0 liters in engine size, 17" rims and 45 series tires are nothing more than boat anchors. You'll gain steering response from the low sidewall, but ride quality, straight line performance and fuel economy will suffer.
|
|
|
05-02-2011, 03:40 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Mechanical engineer
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,272
Thanks: 270
Thanked 841 Times in 414 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by arcosine
Going from 175/70R14(stock) to 185/65R15 to 165/80R15 to 205/70R15 all positive for MPG. SC1 RPM now 2200 at 70 mph. Bought used 205/70R15 tires for $5 each.
|
Here you have only mildly increased the rim diameter and went to taller tires. That is the way to go but not from 15" to 17" wheels.
When I put 10% taller summer tires on I see instant 10% better mileage.
|
|
|
05-04-2011, 04:38 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Pishtaco
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
|
One reason I'd like to try the larger diameter wheels/tires is the obscene 3000 rpm my engine needs to turn to go 60 mph. If I could drop that 3.5%, that moves it <2900 rpm @ 60 mph.
__________________
Darrell
Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
|
|
|
05-04-2011, 07:06 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
.815 fifth gear x 4.312 diff = 3.514:1 overall top gear ratio.
876.1 tire revs/mile x 3.514 = 3078.86 engine revs/mile;
@ 60 mph = 3078.86 engine rpm.
84.6mm (3.33") stroke @ 3080 rpm = 1709 ft/mn piston speed.
It is said that many engines achieve peak efficiency at 1000-1200 ft/mn piston speed.
1800-2200 engine rpm = 1000-1200 ft/mn piston speed.
That also equals 36-44 mph.
If that piston speed theory applies to your engine, it looks like you could benefit from a "gear-up"... or get used to cruising at 44 mph.
Last edited by Frank Lee; 05-04-2011 at 07:39 AM..
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-04-2011, 12:17 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 228
Thanks: 0
Thanked 23 Times in 17 Posts
|
Sometimes if you don't increase the WIDTH of the tire, you can get a LOT taller tire on the car. It depends where the rub point is.
|
|
|
05-04-2011, 08:19 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Pishtaco
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
|
In the interest of science, and because I have a curious mind, I bought taller tires today. I was browsing Craigslist yesterday, and found four used Goodyear Eagle NCT 5s with 70% tread for $30 each, size 205/50-17. I've saved >$1700 hypermiling, so I don't feel guilty spending some of my savings on the frivolity of pretty wheels.
The new tire/wheel combo is 5.31% taller, 25.07" to the stocker 185/60-15s' 23.74". They turn 829.6 rpmile v. 876.1 rpmile for the stockers. So when the engine used to spin ~3000 rpm to go 60 mph, it will now spin ~2840. They rub a bit on full left turns, but so did the stock tire/wheel combo.
The stockers had a 5% speedometer error (60 mph indicated was about an actual 57 mph), but no odometer error. The new tires should correct my optimistic speedometer, with their 5.6% slower factor, and I'll need to incorporate a 5.6% odometer error.
I hope to do some ABA testing in the future.
__________________
Darrell
Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
Last edited by SentraSE-R; 05-04-2011 at 08:27 PM..
|
|
|
05-04-2011, 10:35 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,819
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,480 Times in 3,445 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SentraSE-R
In the interest of science, and because I have a curious mind, I bought taller tires today.
|
If you do a lot of hwy driving I would expect an increase in efficiency. I'm VERY interested to see your ABA results, or anything you can share on the subject.
I have been considering a larger diameter tire when it comes time for new meats on my car, but only for reasons of increased MPGs.
|
|
|
05-05-2011, 12:53 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SentraSE-R
In the interest of science, and because I have a curious mind, I bought taller tires today. I was browsing Craigslist yesterday, and found four used Goodyear Eagle NCT 5s with 70% tread for $30 each, size 205/50-17. I've saved >$1700 hypermiling, so I don't feel guilty spending some of my savings on the frivolity of pretty wheels.
The new tire/wheel combo is 5.31% taller, 25.07" to the stocker 185/60-15s' 23.74". They turn 829.6 rpmile v. 876.1 rpmile for the stockers. So when the engine used to spin ~3000 rpm to go 60 mph, it will now spin ~2840. They rub a bit on full left turns, but so did the stock tire/wheel combo.
The stockers had a 5% speedometer error (60 mph indicated was about an actual 57 mph), but no odometer error. The new tires should correct my optimistic speedometer, with their 5.6% slower factor, and I'll need to incorporate a 5.6% odometer error.
I hope to do some ABA testing in the future.
|
Weight.......weight..........weight............:co nfused:
TIRERACK says that an 185 weights 18 lb and the 205 weights 24lbs
15 inch alloy rim 15.4 lbs 17 inch same brand is 17.6lbs.
your vehivcle weights 2395lbs
while moving you are slinging an additional 40lbs at each wheel or all 4 wheels moving have added 5% to the curb weight.........
you will be buying rotors and pads.......
Last edited by mcrews; 05-05-2011 at 01:12 AM..
|
|
|
|