Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-01-2011, 06:56 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SentraSE-R View Post
Ouch. The truth hurts. I'm now reduced to thinking that if I go through with this, the best I can expect is no net loss in mpg - if I'm lucky.
You're getting some pretty good mileage already with this set up

It'll get tough to improve upon that.

__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-01-2011, 11:42 PM   #12 (permalink)
Pishtaco
 
SentraSE-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485

Mean Green Toaster Machine - '06 Scion xB
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
Thanks. It's difficult to keep the mpgs up. I drove 200 miles to and from a car meet yesterday. I fought a 35-40 mph headwind going up, and averaged only ~37 mpg going out. I had to run lights on the way home, and averaged only 41+ mpg on the return.
__________________
Darrell

Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2011, 12:41 AM   #13 (permalink)
500 Mile Metro Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sun City, CA
Posts: 183

'89 Dakota LB - blue - '89 Dodge Dakota V6 LE
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

'17 Fiat 124 - SunFiat - '17 Fiat 124 Spider Classica
90 day: 30.51 mpg (US)

'89 Metro - The Egg - '89 Geo Metro Base
90 day: 50.71 mpg (US)

'94 Alto - The Box - '94 Suzuki Alto Ce-L
90 day: 39.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SentraSE-R View Post
Ouch. The truth hurts. I'm now reduced to thinking that if I go through with this, the best I can expect is no net loss in mpg - if I'm lucky.

I'm in a deal for the wheels. It looks like my best option is to sell them & stick with the stockers.
On a small 4 cyl car of less than 2.0 liters in engine size, 17" rims and 45 series tires are nothing more than boat anchors. You'll gain steering response from the low sidewall, but ride quality, straight line performance and fuel economy will suffer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2011, 02:40 AM   #14 (permalink)
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,250

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 261
Thanked 816 Times in 400 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by arcosine View Post
Going from 175/70R14(stock) to 185/65R15 to 165/80R15 to 205/70R15 all positive for MPG. SC1 RPM now 2200 at 70 mph. Bought used 205/70R15 tires for $5 each.
Here you have only mildly increased the rim diameter and went to taller tires. That is the way to go but not from 15" to 17" wheels.

When I put 10% taller summer tires on I see instant 10% better mileage.
__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 03:38 AM   #15 (permalink)
Pishtaco
 
SentraSE-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485

Mean Green Toaster Machine - '06 Scion xB
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
One reason I'd like to try the larger diameter wheels/tires is the obscene 3000 rpm my engine needs to turn to go 60 mph. If I could drop that 3.5%, that moves it <2900 rpm @ 60 mph.
__________________
Darrell

Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 06:06 AM   #16 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
.815 fifth gear x 4.312 diff = 3.514:1 overall top gear ratio.

876.1 tire revs/mile x 3.514 = 3078.86 engine revs/mile;
@ 60 mph = 3078.86 engine rpm.

84.6mm (3.33") stroke @ 3080 rpm = 1709 ft/mn piston speed.

It is said that many engines achieve peak efficiency at 1000-1200 ft/mn piston speed.

1800-2200 engine rpm = 1000-1200 ft/mn piston speed.

That also equals 36-44 mph.

If that piston speed theory applies to your engine, it looks like you could benefit from a "gear-up"... or get used to cruising at 44 mph.
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 05-04-2011 at 06:39 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
SentraSE-R (05-04-2011)
Old 05-04-2011, 11:17 AM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 228
Thanks: 0
Thanked 23 Times in 17 Posts
Sometimes if you don't increase the WIDTH of the tire, you can get a LOT taller tire on the car. It depends where the rub point is.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 07:19 PM   #18 (permalink)
Pishtaco
 
SentraSE-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485

Mean Green Toaster Machine - '06 Scion xB
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
In the interest of science, and because I have a curious mind, I bought taller tires today. I was browsing Craigslist yesterday, and found four used Goodyear Eagle NCT 5s with 70% tread for $30 each, size 205/50-17. I've saved >$1700 hypermiling, so I don't feel guilty spending some of my savings on the frivolity of pretty wheels.

The new tire/wheel combo is 5.31% taller, 25.07" to the stocker 185/60-15s' 23.74". They turn 829.6 rpmile v. 876.1 rpmile for the stockers. So when the engine used to spin ~3000 rpm to go 60 mph, it will now spin ~2840. They rub a bit on full left turns, but so did the stock tire/wheel combo.

The stockers had a 5% speedometer error (60 mph indicated was about an actual 57 mph), but no odometer error. The new tires should correct my optimistic speedometer, with their 5.6% slower factor, and I'll need to incorporate a 5.6% odometer error.

I hope to do some ABA testing in the future.
__________________
Darrell

Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg

Last edited by SentraSE-R; 05-04-2011 at 07:27 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 09:35 PM   #19 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,490

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,220
Thanked 4,395 Times in 3,368 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SentraSE-R View Post
In the interest of science, and because I have a curious mind, I bought taller tires today.
If you do a lot of hwy driving I would expect an increase in efficiency. I'm VERY interested to see your ABA results, or anything you can share on the subject.

I have been considering a larger diameter tire when it comes time for new meats on my car, but only for reasons of increased MPGs.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 11:53 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SentraSE-R View Post
In the interest of science, and because I have a curious mind, I bought taller tires today. I was browsing Craigslist yesterday, and found four used Goodyear Eagle NCT 5s with 70% tread for $30 each, size 205/50-17. I've saved >$1700 hypermiling, so I don't feel guilty spending some of my savings on the frivolity of pretty wheels.

The new tire/wheel combo is 5.31% taller, 25.07" to the stocker 185/60-15s' 23.74". They turn 829.6 rpmile v. 876.1 rpmile for the stockers. So when the engine used to spin ~3000 rpm to go 60 mph, it will now spin ~2840. They rub a bit on full left turns, but so did the stock tire/wheel combo.

The stockers had a 5% speedometer error (60 mph indicated was about an actual 57 mph), but no odometer error. The new tires should correct my optimistic speedometer, with their 5.6% slower factor, and I'll need to incorporate a 5.6% odometer error.

I hope to do some ABA testing in the future.
Weight.......weight..........weight............:co nfused:
TIRERACK says that an 185 weights 18 lb and the 205 weights 24lbs
15 inch alloy rim 15.4 lbs 17 inch same brand is 17.6lbs.
your vehivcle weights 2395lbs

while moving you are slinging an additional 40lbs at each wheel or all 4 wheels moving have added 5% to the curb weight.........

you will be buying rotors and pads.......

__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938

Last edited by mcrews; 05-05-2011 at 12:12 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com