Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-15-2009, 03:39 PM   #1 (permalink)
Coasting Down the Peak
 
skyl4rk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: M I C H I G A N
Posts: 514

Toyauto Pickup - '94 Toyota Pickup 2WD
90 day: 36.32 mpg (US)

Versa Base - '09 Versa Sedan 1.6 Base
Team Nissan
90 day: 41.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 27
Thanked 42 Times in 35 Posts
Ursaab














__________________
Nissan Versa Aeromods
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to skyl4rk For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (06-15-2010)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-15-2009, 08:21 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 63 Times in 41 Posts
Thank you for sharing

Thank you for sharing....looks similar to the older VWs and Porsche vehicles. What is old, I'm sure will be new again. I really like the look, it is very pleasing to my eyes.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2009, 10:05 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
Hiya,

I started a thread on this car a little while back:

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...saab-6823.html

Unfortunately the Cd is 0.32 -- not as good as you'd think, and not as good as the Tatra (or my xA, for that matter) -- but it does look good to me, and maybe with flush bumpers, a smoothed underside, and a few other tweaks, it could be better than a gen 3 Prius?
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 12:34 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cookeville, TN
Posts: 850
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
The rounded curved shapes doom it to the cd. the rear slope is not steep enough so its acting like a giant sail for wind resistance.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2009, 11:11 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 32
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
And according to Wikipedia the current Saab 9-5 wagon's cd is .31 ! (.29 for the sedan)
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2009, 11:16 PM   #6 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Topside looks pretty nice to me; from that front shot it looks like a pretty knobby undercarriage. Carries a bit of wasted frontal area too- frontal area that doesn't translate into useful interior volume. I always liked the look of it though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2009, 04:58 PM   #7 (permalink)
Boxhead
 
whokilledthejams's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredonia, NY
Posts: 322

Boxy Brown - '04 Scion xB
90 day: 35.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to whokilledthejams
All of the early SAABs (the 92001 through the 96) are great-looking cars, even if their cD doesn't totally make it obvious that they were designed by aircraft designers.

Of course, the UrSAAB was designed by hand, on a drafting table, so that's important to bear in mind.

As Neil pointed out, Tatra (via Hans Ledwinka) apparently had quite the knack for aerodynamics even in the 1930s.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2009, 07:17 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
vtec-e's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 507

De Yaris - '04 toyota yaris T2
90 day: 69.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 111
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
Love the tuft testing pic!

ollie
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2009, 08:51 PM   #9 (permalink)
Cogito ergo soy
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sterling, MA
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
SAAB, not Saab

It's a shame that that teardrop, wing cross section shape resulted in lift. Top speed was right around 60 mph. Wind tunnel testing (much later) indicated lift-off at about 75 mph. Old aero engineering design habits die hard, I guess.

The high hoodline was necessitated by the thermo-siphon cooling system, the radiator had to be above the engine for the water flow to work. There was no water pump.
The Saab 92, the first production SAAB automobile, kept the thermo-siphon with it's transverse twin two stroke. The "bullnosed" 93, and early 95 and 96 had the inline triple with a combined generator water pump, but the radiator was still above and behind the engine. In 1966 the nose of the 95 and 96 was lengthened in preparation for the V-4 engine and the rad was finally moved up front.
The 94 (Sonett Super Sport) had the 93 engine, but turned around to be a mid-engine, FWD sports racer. It's rad was in front and had an electric fan. Six Model 94 were built in 1956 before the run ceased. The racing class rules under which they were built were hurriedly changed, at the insistence of competitive manufacturers, within a week of the first one being completed. All six are still running but 4 are in museums now.
Quote:
All of the early SAABs (the 92001 through the 96) are great-looking cars,..
I take strong exception to that omission of the Model 97 Sonett, both the Sonett II and V-4 of 1966 through 1969, and the Sonett III from 1970 to 1974.
I will allow that the single (maybe two) examples of model 98 (basically a 96 trying to be a 99 wagonback, sort of a mid point between the 96 sedan and the 95 wagon) is/are a bit weird looking even for someone who's had SAABs in the family since 1961.
And all of these had flat floors and except for the V-4's from 1967 onward, full engine floors, too. The V-4 needed access to the crankcase for oil changes, not needed with the strokers, so those had a hole cut out of the engine floor pan. The "knobby undercarriage" mentioned above is the exhaust pipe, that's it. Brake cables, brake hoses, fuel lines, wiring, all ran inside so as to not get caught in ice and snow. Even the rear axle was tucked up.


SAAB used to mean Svenska Aeroplan Aktiebolaget.
Since GM took control Saab means "Simply another anonymous Buick".

p.s. My own 1969 Sonett V-4 has just a shade over 100k miles on it now.
And there's a Metro XFi engine the same size, same power as the V-4, but more than 100 lbs lighter, in my shed just waiting to get under that fiberglass hood...
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2009, 01:56 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 216
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
The Sonnet III had pretty impressive aerodynamics.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Saab 92001 aka: UrSaab NeilBlanchard Aerodynamics 12 06-19-2010 01:55 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com