Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Fossil Fuel Free
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-03-2023, 07:59 PM   #1 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Ecomodder chart for range gain from cD reduction ?

Is there a chart somewhere that shows gain in range on an EV from a reduction in drag ?
I see the Ecomodder chart for ICE vehicles, but not EVs.

I'm curious what the range increase would be on a 1st gen Nissan Leaf if the drag was reduced from the stock .32 to .22


Using 24.5 sq ft for frontal area
.32 as the cD
3,375 as the weight
75 mph speed
For this example, the car would get 50 miles of range stock at this speed.

- Thanks

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-03-2023, 08:11 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,761
Thanks: 7,799
Thanked 8,600 Times in 7,082 Posts
Try it and see.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
Cd (03-05-2023)
Old 03-04-2023, 05:24 AM   #3 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,634

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*´ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
90 day: 587.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 74
Thanked 704 Times in 446 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
You just need the Crr too:
https://ecomodder.com/forum/tool-aer...resistance.php
__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2023, 10:07 AM   #4 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev View Post
Thanks, but what about other variables, such as engine drivetrain efficiency and such ?
I have seen a figure of 75 % efficiency for electric motors.

Putting in this variable gives an answer, but it is in MPG.
How would I translate that to Miles per Kw ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2023, 11:53 AM   #5 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,634

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*´ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
90 day: 587.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 74
Thanked 704 Times in 446 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
Quote:
How would I translate that to Miles per Kw?
With Crr 0.007 and parasitic load 300w i got 20,638.63w for Cd 0.32 and 15,384.21w for Cd 0.22.

Just divide the wH/h (i.e. w) with mph and you get wH/mile, then divide by driveline efficience, I get 367wH/mile for Cd 0.32 and 273wH/mile for cd 0.22.

The ratio is 1.34 so 50 miles should turn into about 67 miles of range.
__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jakobnev For This Useful Post:
Cd (03-05-2023)
Old 03-05-2023, 03:37 PM   #6 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev View Post
With Crr 0.007 and parasitic load 300w i got 20,638.63w for Cd 0.32 and 15,384.21w for Cd 0.22.

Just divide the wH/h (i.e. w) with mph and you get wH/mile, then divide by driveline efficience, I get 367wH/mile for Cd 0.32 and 273wH/mile for cd 0.22.

The ratio is 1.34 so 50 miles should turn into about 67 miles of range.
Only 17 more miles from such a drastic reduction in drag ? Wow.
That's not even worth the effort !

I read a thread on the MyLeaf forums where the guy added a grille block and front spats on the tires and got " around 18 miles extra range ".
I had my doubts, but knew that aero was really important for EVS.
I had my hopes up that there was this huge difference from ICE cars that made this possible.

Bummer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2023, 04:11 PM   #7 (permalink)
High Altitude Hybrid
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Gunnison, CO
Posts: 1,996

Avalon - '13 Toyota Avalon HV
90 day: 40.45 mpg (US)

Prius - '06 Toyota Prius
Thanks: 1,061
Thanked 552 Times in 441 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd View Post
Only 17 more miles from such a drastic reduction in drag ? Wow.
That's not even worth the effort !
17 miles more than 50 miles is a 34% improvement in efficiency. How is that not worth it?

That would be like and improvement getting you 40mpg instead of 26mpg in an ICEV.

"Around 18 miles extra range" on what Nissan Leaf? Was it one with only 50 miles typically? If that's the case, then yes, it's easy to be off without strict scientific testing. I'm not saying the Leaf owner didn't get or at least perceive 18 miles extra range. But that may not be entirely from supposed aerodynamic improvements.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2023, 10:28 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,909
Thanks: 23,994
Thanked 7,227 Times in 4,654 Posts
'LEAF @ Cd 0.22 & 75-mph'

without boring you with the details, and using your 'Drag Queens' values for the Nissan, I came up with 99.1-miles range, at 139.2 mpg-e.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you slowed down to 65-mph, you'd be looking at 120.4-miles range, at 180.6-mpg-e
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you further slowed to Tesla Motors 57-mph 'sweet-spot', you'd be looking at 141.5-miles range, at 212.3-mpg-e
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you did the 'Think Flight' modifications, with Cd 0.175, and Tesla's 57-mph, you'd be looking at 160.7-miles, at 241-mpg-e
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is predicated upon:
* no air conditioning
* 98% power electronics efficiency
* 98% single-speed transmission efficiency
* 93.71% motor efficiency
* calm
* level
* dry
* Interstate or state highway constant speed cruising
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At 75-mph your wasting 3.219-horsepower / hour to waste heat.
8,197-Btu / hour
0.683-'tons' of heat, capable of heating a larger-than-normal tiny home.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At 75-mph, the aerodynamic power-cubed law is handing you your own backside.
MOTOR TREND tried it with the Gen-II LEAF, and immediately slowed down to 65-mph. The range had fallen in great excess of what the odometer was gaining.
* SAE Standard air

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com