11-28-2007, 07:34 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
Using Google Earth to measure odometer accuracy
The old-fashioned way to check your odometer is by counting mile posts on the highway and comparing them to the distance the car's odometer reports.
The new-fashioned way is to use a GPS unit.
The Google Earth way lets you pre-measure a very specific route, and then go out and drive it to make the comparison.
In the google earth program, just zoom in on the area you want to measure, go to the "tools" menu, then to "measure", then select whether you want to measure a "line" or "path". ("path" is more useful unless the road you're measuring is perfectly straight!)
Use the tool to measure out your path, hop in the car, and go drive it. of course, the longer the path you measure & drive, the more accurate your odometer calibration will be.
One difficulty arises if you happen to live in an area which is not covered in a high resolution by the google earth images (meaning, you can't zoom in close enough to discern local roads & intersections).
Why bother with odometer verification? Because an inaccurate odometer throws off your mileage calculations - a 2% error on a 50 MPG vehicle = 1 mpg off. maybe you switched to different wheels or tires (or transmissions). or maybe your odometer is out of whack from the factory. Maybe you're really getting worse MPG than you think; or maybe it's better! you'll never know if you don't check it out.
If you use google earth to measure out a longer drive for better accuracy, take intermediate readings (in both G.E. and in the car) at several points along your route. Hold on to this info and you'll have a reference you can use to check changes to the car in the future (e.g. tire size, transmission changes). The shorter segments give you the option of doing quick tests.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
03-21-2010, 01:47 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Twin Cities area
Posts: 14
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
there is also the option of walking into a police station, ask if/where they have a radar trailer deployed, and carefully accelerate until the radar trailer display ticks up to a nice round number and then check your speedo. 39... 39... 39... 40, check speedo.
Last edited by al_capwn; 03-21-2010 at 02:04 PM..
|
|
|
03-04-2011, 04:49 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Commiefornia
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
both of those methods listed in this thread are notoriously unreliable. The best way is to just carry with you a GPS unit that says the MPH you are going. Google earth, when calculating distance, does not factor in elevation and its detection of elevation isn't not exactly "accurate". Google earth has no idea if you're climbing a highway onramp, how steep it is or anything of the sort to give you an example. As for the MPH radar detectors, they're not terribly accurate.
I suppose the utmost accurate way to measure mph, distance, etc. is to make your own speedometer, measure out the wheel, tire, gearing, etc. everything to the mm, then find an area that is exactly one mile long, mark it with paint, then when maintaining a given speed, with a stop watch, calculate how long it takes to make it across. Then Adjust speedometer accordingly. There is more to it than I've said but the point is, if utmost accuracy is needed, I think it can be figured out how to accomplish it with the most basic instruments.
|
|
|
03-04-2011, 05:00 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
Good point about elevation changes not being factored by the Google Earth distance measuring tool.
When I tested Google Earth against a calibrated odometer, it happened to be on flat terrain, so there wasn't any error detected.
But it's worth noting.
|
|
|
03-04-2011, 05:17 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Making Ecomods a G thing
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 655
Thanks: 35
Thanked 75 Times in 58 Posts
|
also take into account overlapping photos will mess up calculations as well
__________________
|
|
|
03-06-2011, 06:20 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
The PRC.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
|
Is there a tool for elevation as well ?
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
|
|
|
03-06-2011, 07:52 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
|
Originally, I thought that Google Earth did take elevation into account; but unfortunately, it does not.
In my (non-exhaustive) search, I found results that indicate that GPS units are far from accurate for elevations, and therefore do not measure distances taking elevation into account...
|
|
|
03-06-2011, 12:49 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
The PRC.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
|
I've seen some elevation maps that people have made from one point to the next. I would like to have a look at that to check the differences between home and work and back. Home is near the sea, work is about 10 miles inland - uphill (and 45-50 mpg ave) there, downhill (55-65 mpg ave) back.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
|
|
|
06-28-2011, 11:29 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
Used the Google Earth technique to check the accuracy of the UFO's (2000 Honda Insight) odometer yesterday:
35.9 km indicated
35.35 km plotted on Google Earth
Assuming no error in Google Earth (* there were a few elevation changes on this route that might skew it to measure lower than actual), that means the odo is over-reporting distance traveled by 1.5%
I'll borrow a GPS to compare...
|
|
|
07-10-2011, 11:39 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
And I did borrow a GPS. It was very close to the car's odo:
30 km indicated
29.85 km GPS
That means the odo is over-reporting distance traveled by 0.5% compared to the GPS.
And this single comparison to the Google Earth Method (TM) shows it's very close (and seems to confirm the measurement will be short if there are lots of -- or big -- elevation changes on the measured route).
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
|