Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > DIY / How-to
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-28-2007, 06:34 PM   #1 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 21,055

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.01 mpg (US)

Winter beater Metro - '00 Chevrolet Metro
90 day: 73.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,842
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,946 Posts
Using Google Earth to measure odometer accuracy




The old-fashioned way to check your odometer is by counting mile posts on the highway and comparing them to the distance the car's odometer reports.

The new-fashioned way is to use a GPS unit.

The Google Earth way lets you pre-measure a very specific route, and then go out and drive it to make the comparison.

In the google earth program, just zoom in on the area you want to measure, go to the "tools" menu, then to "measure", then select whether you want to measure a "line" or "path". ("path" is more useful unless the road you're measuring is perfectly straight!)

Use the tool to measure out your path, hop in the car, and go drive it. of course, the longer the path you measure & drive, the more accurate your odometer calibration will be.

One difficulty arises if you happen to live in an area which is not covered in a high resolution by the google earth images (meaning, you can't zoom in close enough to discern local roads & intersections).

Why bother with odometer verification? Because an inaccurate odometer throws off your mileage calculations - a 2% error on a 50 MPG vehicle = 1 mpg off. maybe you switched to different wheels or tires (or transmissions). or maybe your odometer is out of whack from the factory. Maybe you're really getting worse MPG than you think; or maybe it's better! you'll never know if you don't check it out.

If you use google earth to measure out a longer drive for better accuracy, take intermediate readings (in both G.E. and in the car) at several points along your route. Hold on to this info and you'll have a reference you can use to check changes to the car in the future (e.g. tire size, transmission changes). The shorter segments give you the option of doing quick tests.

__________________
Latest mods test: 15 mods = 15% MPG improvement: A-B test, 2007 Honda Civic 1.8L, 5-speed
Ecodriving test:
Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown: Nissan Micra 1.6L



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
TEiN (11-23-2009)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-21-2010, 12:47 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Twin Cities area
Posts: 14

Audi - '05 Audi S4
90 day: 17.82 mpg (US)

Saturn - '01 Saturn SC SOHC
90 day: 46.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lightbulb

there is also the option of walking into a police station, ask if/where they have a radar trailer deployed, and carefully accelerate until the radar trailer display ticks up to a nice round number and then check your speedo. 39... 39... 39... 40, check speedo.


Last edited by al_capwn; 03-21-2010 at 01:04 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 03:49 PM   #3 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Commiefornia
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
both of those methods listed in this thread are notoriously unreliable. The best way is to just carry with you a GPS unit that says the MPH you are going. Google earth, when calculating distance, does not factor in elevation and its detection of elevation isn't not exactly "accurate". Google earth has no idea if you're climbing a highway onramp, how steep it is or anything of the sort to give you an example. As for the MPH radar detectors, they're not terribly accurate.

I suppose the utmost accurate way to measure mph, distance, etc. is to make your own speedometer, measure out the wheel, tire, gearing, etc. everything to the mm, then find an area that is exactly one mile long, mark it with paint, then when maintaining a given speed, with a stop watch, calculate how long it takes to make it across. Then Adjust speedometer accordingly. There is more to it than I've said but the point is, if utmost accuracy is needed, I think it can be figured out how to accomplish it with the most basic instruments.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 04:00 PM   #4 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 21,055

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.01 mpg (US)

Winter beater Metro - '00 Chevrolet Metro
90 day: 73.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,842
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,946 Posts
Good point about elevation changes not being factored by the Google Earth distance measuring tool.

When I tested Google Earth against a calibrated odometer, it happened to be on flat terrain, so there wasn't any error detected.

But it's worth noting.
__________________
Latest mods test: 15 mods = 15% MPG improvement: A-B test, 2007 Honda Civic 1.8L, 5-speed
Ecodriving test:
Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown: Nissan Micra 1.6L



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 04:17 PM   #5 (permalink)
Making Ecomods a G thing
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 655

Angie - '08 Infiniti G35 X
90 day: 22.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 33
Thanked 74 Times in 57 Posts
also take into account overlapping photos will mess up calculations as well
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 05:20 AM   #6 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 535 Times in 384 Posts
Is there a tool for elevation as well ?
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 06:52 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,588

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,958
Thanked 2,611 Times in 1,624 Posts
Originally, I thought that Google Earth did take elevation into account; but unfortunately, it does not.

In my (non-exhaustive) search, I found results that indicate that GPS units are far from accurate for elevations, and therefore do not measure distances taking elevation into account...
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 11:49 AM   #8 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 535 Times in 384 Posts
I've seen some elevation maps that people have made from one point to the next. I would like to have a look at that to check the differences between home and work and back. Home is near the sea, work is about 10 miles inland - uphill (and 45-50 mpg ave) there, downhill (55-65 mpg ave) back.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2011, 10:29 AM   #9 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 21,055

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.01 mpg (US)

Winter beater Metro - '00 Chevrolet Metro
90 day: 73.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,842
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,946 Posts
Used the Google Earth technique to check the accuracy of the UFO's (2000 Honda Insight) odometer yesterday:

35.9 km indicated
35.35 km plotted on Google Earth

Assuming no error in Google Earth (* there were a few elevation changes on this route that might skew it to measure lower than actual), that means the odo is over-reporting distance traveled by 1.5%

I'll borrow a GPS to compare...
__________________
Latest mods test: 15 mods = 15% MPG improvement: A-B test, 2007 Honda Civic 1.8L, 5-speed
Ecodriving test:
Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown: Nissan Micra 1.6L



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2011, 10:39 PM   #10 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 21,055

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.01 mpg (US)

Winter beater Metro - '00 Chevrolet Metro
90 day: 73.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,842
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,946 Posts
And I did borrow a GPS. It was very close to the car's odo:

30 km indicated
29.85 km GPS

That means the odo is over-reporting distance traveled by 0.5% compared to the GPS.

And this single comparison to the Google Earth Method (TM) shows it's very close (and seems to confirm the measurement will be short if there are lots of -- or big -- elevation changes on the measured route).

__________________
Latest mods test: 15 mods = 15% MPG improvement: A-B test, 2007 Honda Civic 1.8L, 5-speed
Ecodriving test:
Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown: Nissan Micra 1.6L



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (07-11-2011)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com