Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-21-2016, 01:24 AM   #1 (permalink)
In Lean Burn Mode
 
pgfpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,530

MisFit Talon - '91 Eagle Talon TSi
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 39.03 mpg (US)

Warlock - '71 Chevy Camaro

Fe Eclipse - '97 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS
Thanks: 1,252
Thanked 584 Times in 376 Posts
Very cool cam less video

I love all the possibility's.
'Engineering Explained' tackles Koenigsegg's camless engine

__________________
Pressure Gradient Force
The Positive Side of the Number Line

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to pgfpro For This Useful Post:
Joggernot (10-22-2016)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-21-2016, 08:08 AM   #2 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Very cool cam less video

Impressive. But until they increase their animation budget, they're still going to need to use cams for their videos.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fat Charlie For This Useful Post:
Xist (10-21-2016)
Old 10-21-2016, 10:55 AM   #3 (permalink)
In Lean Burn Mode
 
pgfpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,530

MisFit Talon - '91 Eagle Talon TSi
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 39.03 mpg (US)

Warlock - '71 Chevy Camaro

Fe Eclipse - '97 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS
Thanks: 1,252
Thanked 584 Times in 376 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Charlie View Post
Very cool cam less video

Impressive. But until they increase their animation budget, they're still going to need to use cams for their videos.
LOL

I forgot the other video.
__________________
Pressure Gradient Force
The Positive Side of the Number Line

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2016, 08:01 PM   #4 (permalink)
.
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Salt Lake valley Utah
Posts: 923
Thanks: 114
Thanked 397 Times in 224 Posts
__________________
I try to be helpful. I'm not an expert.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2016, 01:49 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
Interesting, they moved from pneumatic to electromagnetic, and that solenoid wire is a very reasonable size. I hope this is the solution we've been waiting for.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2016, 02:00 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,712
Thanks: 7,780
Thanked 8,586 Times in 7,070 Posts
47% more torque
45% more horsepower
15% better fuel economy
35% less emissions

The part I'd like to see explained is using it for a compressed air pump for regeneration. That sounds like an end run around the Scuderi patent.

Quote:
There's also no need for a throttle body and the packaging of the engine is more simplified compared to an engine using a camshaft system.
No pumping loses. When the Chinese actuators are on eBay, it will be possible to 3D print a VW 1600cc boxer head with a 4-valve hemi combustion chambers and a compressed air hybrid system. It would rev to 15,000rpm.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2016, 03:25 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
47% more torque is rather dishonest. They just turned the boost pressure up to get that.

A typical NA street engine with 1 cam profile produces something like 75Nm/L at 1500rpm, and around 100Nm/L in the midrange. With a big cam, you can get 120-130Nm/L at high speed, but that's it.

Ideal valve timing can get you maybe around 90Nm/L at low speed rather than 70-80, the same 120-130 at high speed, and maybe 110 in the midrange if the intake runners are tuned to work best there. The torque increase is more like maybe 3-5% peak, and 10-20% in "torque dip" regions. The torque increase over something with multiple cam profiles will be much smaller.

If these are commercialized and have reasonable power consumption that would be a dream come true. More power, more efficiency, less weight.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2016, 02:09 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: KY
Posts: 1,351

IGL - '04 Saturn Ion
Team Saturn
90 day: 56.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 63
Thanked 365 Times in 268 Posts
He also said in the video at on that redesigned cylinder head he was running 12:1 compression instead of the original 9:1, which would make substantially more torque as well... On an earlier video, he mentioned retrofitting a Saab 9-5, and gaining 20%, which sounds more reasonable... It sounds great, having a continuously variable valve opening profile...

__________________
My current Ecotec project...


My last Ecotec project...
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com