Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Reply  Post New Thread
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-24-2012, 08:15 PM   #1 (permalink)
Ultimate Fail
Cd's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,309
Thanks: 2,629
Thanked 916 Times in 545 Posts
Veyron engine loses 2,000 hp to waste heat !

I was surprised to see that the Bugatti Veyron engine produced 3,000 horsepower on the dyno, but 2/3 of this is lost to waste heat !
- @ 8:40 in the video

As i watched this video, all i could think of was wow, what a f-ing waste !!

I know using waste heat for increased efficiency is being looked into, but I had no idea ICEs could be this inefficient !

What has been the major hurdle in using waste heat, and why is it taking so long ?

I know it's not this simple, but could steam from some sort of liquid be used on a turbine and then recirculated in an enclosed piping to liquify and create steam again ? Why does this not work ?

dumb question ?

( Had to ask )

From the video @ 9:16
Quote " At full load, we could generate enough waste energy to keep 100 homes warm in winter "

( EDIT : And yes it's a Bugatti VEYRON, not Veron )

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

Old 11-24-2012, 08:49 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,020 Times in 1,303 Posts
You get about 1/3rd work (ideally) and 2/3rds waste heat. Of course that is considering heating up the atmosphere is a waste, but lets not get into that debate. In reality it's closer to 1/5th work and 4/5th waste heat or even worse.

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2012, 09:02 PM   #3 (permalink)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 528

ECONORAM - '07 Dodge RAM 1500 QC SLT flex-fuel
90 day: 18.16 mpg (US)

the Avenger - '08 Dodge Avenger SXT
90 day: 27.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 385
Thanked 93 Times in 79 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to ECONORAM
I've admired the Veyron since it rolled out. Had no idea it generated that much heat! It even has Titanium con rods and coated pistons. 10 radiators?

I agree, there should be some way to recover some of that energy. I recall in WWII the Wright Cyclone had power-recovery turbines, geared directly to the crankshaft. It gained 150hp per turbine, I think. Found it: 550hp--> http://www.enginehistory.org/Wright/...ompounds.shtml Could be an idea...a working turbine extracts energy, which would cool the exhaust. The W16 is an 8L (487ci), so I don't think it'd get as much as the R3350, but should get something.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ECONORAM For This Useful Post:
Cd (11-24-2012)
Old 11-24-2012, 09:15 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
JRMichler's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 980

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 32.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 187
Thanked 411 Times in 263 Posts
Piston aircraft engines typically cruise at 75% power, while automobile engines typically cruise at 5% to 10% power. At 75% power, the exhaust is hot enough to get useful work from. At 10% power, it is not.

Those aircraft engines with the power recovery turbines were notorious for needing a lot of maintenance.

Exhaust heat recovery is the latest thing in large powerplant gas turbines. The best ones are up to 60% efficiency.
The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 11:06 AM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Poland
Posts: 2
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
1/3 of heat energy transfer to useful work is quite typical maximum efficiency for SI engine. At part throttle is even much, much worse.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 11:50 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,594

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 177
Thanked 363 Times in 256 Posts
I have a resentment of the veyron, simply because 1001 hp just isn't that impressive considering a v16, 4 turbochargers... you can get much more power for much less money.

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 11:52 AM   #7 (permalink)
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,522 Times in 1,123 Posts
The Wright Dual-Cyclone R3350 turbo-compound engines with power-recovery turbines were able to "recover" 300 hp above their native 3,000 hp output...that's 10% recovery, but went as high as 450 hp and 20% recovery on some models.

Last edited by gone-ot; 11-26-2012 at 12:29 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 01:06 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
Sven7's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 665 Times in 408 Posts
It's kind of confusing how you worded that, Cd. The car nets 1001 metric hp (~987 hp), so you're saying if it were 100% efficient it would put out 3000. Maybe hp isn't the right unit to use when talking about wasted thermal energy. But I'm nit picking

Originally Posted by ksa8907 View Post
I have a resentment of the veyron, simply because 1001 hp just isn't that impressive considering a v16, 4 turbochargers... you can get much more power for much less money.
The problem is they have to warranty it.

I think steam locomotives waste about 97% of their energy, correct?
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 08:01 PM   #9 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 9,166
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,067 Times in 937 Posts
I always considered the Veyron too oppulent. Its engine is interesting, but even a pushrod American V8 under 8-litre can provide comparable power and torque figures in a slightly smaller and lighter package...
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 08:54 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 587 Times in 401 Posts
The whole point of the Veyron is to prove VW could make a 1,001 horsepower car that's actually tractable, easy to drive, streetable, and which won't eat its own guts out after thousands of miles of abuse. Never mind that a new set of Veyron tires and an annual maintenance check could buy you a brand new 1,000 hp crate motor...

The engineering needed to produce 1k ponies is not expensive. the engineering needed to build a car around it that met all of VW's design requirements, however, was insane. Not the least which because the car was designed to fit the body, not the other way around.

I bet the car could be half the cost if they built a supercar first, then built a shell that fit around it, instead.

  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to niky For This Useful Post:
serialk11r (11-26-2012), Sven7 (11-28-2012)
Reply  Post New Thread

waste heat

Thread Tools

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com