Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-26-2012, 07:55 AM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: scotland
Posts: 1,429

The Mistress - '88 Bmw 320i Touring SE
Team m8
Last 3: 27.17 mpg (US)

Germany Beadle - '91 Mercedes 300td (estate, N/A)
90 day: 24.63 mpg (US)

The Bloodylingo - '05 Citroen Berlingo Multispace Desire
90 day: 39.77 mpg (US)

Shanner Scaab - '03 Saab 9-5 estate Vector
90 day: 26.19 mpg (US)

Clio 182 - '05 Renault Clio RS 182 182
90 day: 31.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 89
Thanked 89 Times in 74 Posts
Injector swap from 1 hole to 4 hole- any advantage?

Toying with the idea of swapping out the injectors in my 320i for a set of "type III" 4 pinhole ones..

would there be any advantage re fuel atomisation/ consumption?

car is a 1988 and runs Motronic 1.3 management system

__________________
My Blog on cars- Fu'Gutty Cars
http://fuguttycars.wordpress.com/

US MPG for my Renault Clio 182


---------------------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-26-2012, 08:02 AM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,586 Times in 1,554 Posts
I'd have to say yes, there would be an improvement. However, I've never read anything that states how much it has helped on other vehicles/engines.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2012, 09:39 AM   #3 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
It depends if you have high or low impedence injectors. I remember some of the M20s had LOW while all EV6 injectors are HIGH. Check to make sure first. Also the 2.5 liter M20 had 17# injectors so I assume your 2.0 is 17# or less. EV6 injectors in that range are hard to find. They usually start around 19#. I swapped over my old 1991 M42 years ago, still runs great with its current owner.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2319/...79b3f801_o.jpg
http://i402.photobucket.com/albums/p...s/DSC01724.jpg
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2012, 01:37 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: scotland
Posts: 1,429

The Mistress - '88 Bmw 320i Touring SE
Team m8
Last 3: 27.17 mpg (US)

Germany Beadle - '91 Mercedes 300td (estate, N/A)
90 day: 24.63 mpg (US)

The Bloodylingo - '05 Citroen Berlingo Multispace Desire
90 day: 39.77 mpg (US)

Shanner Scaab - '03 Saab 9-5 estate Vector
90 day: 26.19 mpg (US)

Clio 182 - '05 Renault Clio RS 182 182
90 day: 31.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 89
Thanked 89 Times in 74 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1 View Post
It depends if you have high or low impedence injectors. I remember some of the M20s had LOW while all EV6 injectors are HIGH. Check to make sure first. Also the 2.5 liter M20 had 17# injectors so I assume your 2.0 is 17# or less. EV6 injectors in that range are hard to find. They usually start around 19#. I swapped over my old 1991 M42 years ago, still runs great with its current owner.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2319/...79b3f801_o.jpg
http://i402.photobucket.com/albums/p...s/DSC01724.jpg
the m20b20 runs at 2.5bar as opposed to the 3bar of the 2.5..

I've got the specs for the injectors in the car- they flow 12.65#

here's the details:
Part Number lbs/hr cc /min grams /min PSI BARS lbs/hr cc /min 80% 95%
0-280-150-208 12.65 133 95.68 36.25 2.5 13.86 145.6 19.5 23.1

they also show as EV1 and High impedence

That looks like good work you did on the m42- was it in an e30 then?what injectors did you use?

I'm struggling to find injectors with similar flow rates- the 2.0 6cyl needs relatively little per cyl per cycle- all the 4cyl stuff flows much heavier

ALso, any ideas whether the 4 hole injectors would benefit from a raise in fuel pressure to the 3bar that the 2.5 has?
__________________
My Blog on cars- Fu'Gutty Cars
http://fuguttycars.wordpress.com/

US MPG for my Renault Clio 182


---------------------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2012, 01:53 PM   #5 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
Yeah, it was a 4 door E30 318i. The M42 16v was the base engine in the US for 1991 E30 and all through the E36 generation as well. Lucky us. Very revvy little motor with excellent fuel economy but the rest of the car didn't fit my needs anymore.
When i bought it
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/207/4...b811d3c7_o.jpg
When i got rid of it.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...g?t=1279321275
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...g?t=1271191115
I miss that car some times.

I used 4 Volvo 850 injectors (1996+), 0280 155 846, yellow 19#. The stock M42 injectors were also 19#, identical to the later M30 injectors.
Here's some info on injector PNs.
Stan Weiss' - Electronic Fuel Injector (EFI) Flow Data Table
WitchHunter Performance - Injector Cleaning & Flow Testing Services
For Bosch design 1 or 2 (EV1) the PN will have 150 in the middle. Design 3 (EV6) will have 155. You can try to cross reference the PN for a car model name. Generally speaking EV6 injectors are found on cars from the mid 90s to the early 00s are EV6. The M50, some M52 and M44 have an EV1 injector with multiple holes (design 2). That might be an option for you. Not sure what sizes are available in europe. Even EV14 might be an option.
I don't know how the pressure will affect the EV6 injector but I'm guessing that it shouldn't be a problem. Normally all injectors are tested at 3bar to cross reference specs.

The EV6 injector is available with either the EV1 or UScar plug. Its something to pay attention to.




Make sure the EV6 injectors are the same length as your old ones. I'm pretty sure you have LONG EV1s right now.



good luck

Last edited by tjts1; 01-26-2012 at 02:02 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tjts1 For This Useful Post:
Superfuelgero (06-01-2014)
Old 01-26-2012, 02:00 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: scotland
Posts: 1,429

The Mistress - '88 Bmw 320i Touring SE
Team m8
Last 3: 27.17 mpg (US)

Germany Beadle - '91 Mercedes 300td (estate, N/A)
90 day: 24.63 mpg (US)

The Bloodylingo - '05 Citroen Berlingo Multispace Desire
90 day: 39.77 mpg (US)

Shanner Scaab - '03 Saab 9-5 estate Vector
90 day: 26.19 mpg (US)

Clio 182 - '05 Renault Clio RS 182 182
90 day: 31.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 89
Thanked 89 Times in 74 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1 View Post
Yeah, it was a 4 door E30 318i. The M42 16v was the base engine in the US for 1991 and all through the E36 generation as well. Very revvy little motor with excellent fuel economy but the rest of the car didn't fit my needs anymore. I used 4 Volvo 850 injectors (1996+), 0280 155 846, yellow 19#. The stock M42 injectors were also 19#, identical to the later M30 injectors.
Here's some info on injector PNs.
Stan Weiss' - Electronic Fuel Injector (EFI) Flow Data Table
WitchHunter Performance - Injector Cleaning & Flow Testing Services
For Bosch design 1 or 2 (EV1) the PN will have 150 in the middle. Design 3 (EV6) will have 155. You can try to cross reference the PN for a car model name. Generally speaking EV6 injectors are found on cars from the mid 90s to the early 00s are EV6. The M50, some M52 and M44 have an EV1 injector with multiple holes (design 2). That might be an option for you. Not sure what sizes are available in europe. Even EV14 might be an option.
I don't know how the pressure will affect the EV6 injector but I'm guessing that it shouldn't be a problem. Normally all injectors are tested at 3bar to cross reference specs.

The EV6 injector is available with either the EV1 or UScar plug. Its something to pay attention to.




Make sure the EV6 injectors are the same length as your old ones. I'm pretty sure you have LONG EV1s right now.



good luck
thanks!

I've spent plenty of time on that site the last couple of days-cant find anything that flows the same 12.65#...

I'm concerned about the car flooding, and I dont know whether the management system can account for a higher rate of flow?
__________________
My Blog on cars- Fu'Gutty Cars
http://fuguttycars.wordpress.com/

US MPG for my Renault Clio 182


---------------------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2012, 02:26 PM   #7 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
10-15% over is a safe bet that it can handle it. More than that is anybody's guess.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2012, 11:24 PM   #8 (permalink)
oldschool
 
Olympiadis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 184

White2003Focus - '03 Ford Focus SE 4-door sedan
Team Ford
90 day: 38.53 mpg (US)

White2001S10pickup - '01 Chevy S10 extended cab LR
Last 3: 24.51 mpg (US)

1989DodgeOMNI - '89 Dodge Omni
Last 3: 30.38 mpg (US)

1991ChevyC1500pickup - '91 Chevy C1500
Last 3: 24.03 mpg (US)

White1986Irocz - '86 Chevy Irocz LB9
Last 3: 30.14 mpg (US)

1999 C5 Corvette - '99 Chevy Corvette

2008 Infinity G37 - '08 Infinity G37
Thanks: 21
Thanked 35 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 320touring View Post
I'm concerned about the car flooding, and I dont know whether the management system can account for a higher rate of flow?
I haven't seen everything, but I have yet to see an adaptive fueling routine that couldn't compensate the pulse-widths by at least 25%.
That is during closed-loop though.
The problem is I have never seen a system that applied fuel trims to the cranking fuel, so you could run into problems there.

The new design injectors are supposed to be more efficient, and I'd like to see some really well done tests to show this.
Generally for efficiency (as in ecomodding/hypermiling) you want to size the injector on the small side and run higher pressure.
You want to increase your fuel pressure until you see negative fuel trims in most of your load cells.
The reason you want negative trims is because positive fuel trims, while they have to ADD fuel to bring you back UP to stoich in closed-loop, will often be applied to the fueling values as calculated in other modes of operation like PE Power-Enrichment and AE Acceleration-Enrichment. The other modes of operation are almost always too rich already, on the order of 10 to 15% more fuel than needed. If whatever load cell you are in when you invoke one of these modes has a positive fuel trim, then it gets this extra fuel applied. Negative fuel trims do not normally get applied to anything but normal closed-loop operation.
__________________
#####################################

Last edited by Olympiadis; 01-27-2012 at 09:00 AM.. Reason: fixing mistake after proofreading.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2012, 08:29 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: scotland
Posts: 1,429

The Mistress - '88 Bmw 320i Touring SE
Team m8
Last 3: 27.17 mpg (US)

Germany Beadle - '91 Mercedes 300td (estate, N/A)
90 day: 24.63 mpg (US)

The Bloodylingo - '05 Citroen Berlingo Multispace Desire
90 day: 39.77 mpg (US)

Shanner Scaab - '03 Saab 9-5 estate Vector
90 day: 26.19 mpg (US)

Clio 182 - '05 Renault Clio RS 182 182
90 day: 31.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 89
Thanked 89 Times in 74 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Olympiadis View Post
I haven't seen everything, but I have yet to see an adaptive fueling routine that couldn't compensate the pulse-widths by at least 25%.
That is during closed-loop though.
The problem is I have never seen a system that applied fuel trims to the cranking fuel, so you could run into problems there.

The new design injectors are supposed to be more efficient, and I'd like to see some really well done tests to show this.
Generally for efficiency (as in ecomodding/hypermiling) you want to size the injector on the small side and run higher pressure.
You want to increase your fuel pressure until you see negative fuel trims in most of your load cells.
The reason you want negative trims is because positive fuel trims, while they have to subtract fuel to bring you back down to stoich in closed-loop, will often be applied to the fueling values as calculated in other modes of operation like PE Power-Enrichment and AE Acceleration-Enrichment. The other modes of operation are almost always too rich already, on the order of 10 to 15% more fuel than needed. If whatever load cell you are in when you invoke one of these modes has a positive fuel trim, then it gets this extra fuel applied. Negative fuel trims do not normally get applied to anything but normal closed-loop operation.
Thanks for the info.

The car runs NO knock sensor, only a crank sensor for timing, and has no ability to advance/retard ignition, hence my concern regarding it's abilities to alter pulse widths..

Also, with some more thinking it occurred to me that the lbs for the engine are devided by 6 (6 injectors) so I need to look at SMALLER capacity 4 cyls, rather than ones with comparable bhp/displacement.

i.e. possible replacement injectors from a 1.4/6 rather than a 1.8/2l
__________________
My Blog on cars- Fu'Gutty Cars
http://fuguttycars.wordpress.com/

US MPG for my Renault Clio 182


---------------------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2012, 09:36 AM   #10 (permalink)
oldschool
 
Olympiadis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 184

White2003Focus - '03 Ford Focus SE 4-door sedan
Team Ford
90 day: 38.53 mpg (US)

White2001S10pickup - '01 Chevy S10 extended cab LR
Last 3: 24.51 mpg (US)

1989DodgeOMNI - '89 Dodge Omni
Last 3: 30.38 mpg (US)

1991ChevyC1500pickup - '91 Chevy C1500
Last 3: 24.03 mpg (US)

White1986Irocz - '86 Chevy Irocz LB9
Last 3: 30.14 mpg (US)

1999 C5 Corvette - '99 Chevy Corvette

2008 Infinity G37 - '08 Infinity G37
Thanks: 21
Thanked 35 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 320touring View Post
Thanks for the info.

The car runs NO knock sensor, only a crank sensor for timing, and has no ability to advance/retard ignition, hence my concern regarding it's abilities to alter pulse widths..

Also, with some more thinking it occurred to me that the lbs for the engine are devided by 6 (6 injectors) so I need to look at SMALLER capacity 4 cyls, rather than ones with comparable bhp/displacement.

i.e. possible replacement injectors from a 1.4/6 rather than a 1.8/2l
First, I'm sorry I mistyped a couple of words in my previous post and didn't proofread til this morning. The corrections are in BOLD now.

I don't know exactly what you're running, but even in the older OBD1 systems the spark advance routine (often called adaptive spark) is really separate from the adaptive fueling routine. You can delete your knock sensor and it will not have a direct effect on your pulse width/fuel delivery.
The only function you lose is knock-retard. The spark will still advance as per your programmed calibration values. Again, your fueling corrections will not be hindered by the lack of a knock sensor.
The adaptive fueling keys off of input from your O2 sensor.

Injectors are sized by the individual cylinder size. You have to multiply your lb/hr rating by the number of injectors you have to find total fuel capacity.
The total capacity is always "oversized" in order to cover conditions where you are heavily loading your engine (wide-open throttle) up to the physical RPM limit of your engine, even in very cold conditions (added pulse-width for PE-fuel enrichment, and coolant correction - warm up enrichment), and still be operating at something under 100% duty cycle for the injector at any given RPM. This amount of fuel delivery capacity is FAR more than needed for normal economical driving.

The same fuel injector can be run in either a V8 or an I4, if the cylinder size, volumetric efficiency, and RPM range are about the same between the two engines. An engine with a smaller individual cylinder size will most often have a smaller capacity injector. What I have said here applies to MPFI - an injector per each cylinder. You are right to look at injectors for a smaller displacement engine of the same configuration as yours.

If you've got TBI or a centrally located injector or injector-pair, then the same doesn't apply. A single injector will of course have to feed the entire engine, or entire bank of cylinders. You often run into efficiency troubles with this arrangement because the physical limitation of the injector makes it hard to control fuel delivery when using very small pulse-widths, - at idle for instance. This happens often in performance applications where the injector has been upsized. A better solution is to use a vacuum referenced and adjustable fuel pressure regulator with a smaller injector.
At idle and cruise where vacuum is high, the fuel pressure is kept relatively low, and the smaller injector operates in a very efficient window of capability. The effective load/RPM range of the injector is increased without having to install larger injectors.

This same solution will work with MPFI, and will allow you to downsize your injectors without losing any wide-open throttle capability.
There are people who have cut their injector size down by 50% and have no problems, but they have done so by taking control of their fuel pressure, normally with a vacuum referenced adjustable regulator, and by monitoring their car's fuel trims during operation to make the proper adjustment.
Having control over the ECM tuning (recalibration) is also a big help when doing something like this, but isn't always a must.

__________________
#####################################
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com