Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-29-2017, 05:04 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JockoT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 654

All That Jazz - '06 Honda Jazz i-DSI S
Team Honda
90 day: 48.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 137 Times in 101 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gasoline Fumes View Post
Go ahead and experiment! I have 55-60 PSI in my junkyard tires.

I'm pretty sure I have more grip than the smaller original size tires at correct pressures.
If you have cheap junkyard tyres then go ahead and experiment. Most of us have paid through the nose for our tyres and don't want to wear them out sooner than necessary.

If you fit wide tyres at a higher pressure you probably will have better grip than narrow tyres at recommended pressures. But wide wheels steal mpg and I thought that increased mpg was the whole point of the exercise.

__________________
People Think They Are Thinking When They Are Merely Rearranging Their Prejudices


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-29-2017, 10:16 AM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
If you want to argue contact patch size and traction, you need to run the physics equations for friction.

There will NEVER be a big name organization that will contradict the tire and automobile manufacturers recommendations for tire inflation. Why? Liability in the event of a fatal crash. Even if the tire inflation would make no difference, there could be speculation and a sympathetic jury with a wrongful death/gross negligence lawsuit.
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2017, 08:42 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Darin ran a bunch of coast down tests are different pressures. The result was that there was a definite point of diminishing return at around 45psi, although that was with a light weight Metro. My Renault tyres are rated for 80PSI - I run them at ~65, my rule being to run as much pressure as my vertebrae will allow.

Mechanics always let my tyres down
__________________






  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oldtamiyaphile For This Useful Post:
EcoCivic (07-30-2017)
Old 07-30-2017, 08:46 AM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JockoT View Post
If you have cheap junkyard tyres then go ahead and experiment. Most of us have paid through the nose for our tyres and don't want to wear them out sooner than necessary.
I always buy premium tyres (Contis or Michelins), but over the life of a van tyre I will use about $10,000 worth of fuel. Sacrificing a bit of tyre life ~$800/set can still make financial sense.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2017, 09:47 AM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JockoT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 654

All That Jazz - '06 Honda Jazz i-DSI S
Team Honda
90 day: 48.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 137 Times in 101 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtamiyaphile View Post
I always buy premium tyres (Contis or Michelins), but over the life of a van tyre I will use about $10,000 worth of fuel. Sacrificing a bit of tyre life ~$800/set can still make financial sense.
That is certainly the financial way to look at it.
Over the life of a set of tyres, I would have to make a fuel saving of 8% (55 to 59 mpg) to break even. Would I see that sort of improvement in my fuel usage by running at elevated pressures?
Mind you, any appreciable deterioration in tyre life would make even 8% uneconomical for me.
__________________
People Think They Are Thinking When They Are Merely Rearranging Their Prejudices


  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2017, 12:04 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JockoT View Post
That is certainly the financial way to look at it.
Over the life of a set of tyres, I would have to make a fuel saving of 8% (55 to 59 mpg) to break even. Would I see that sort of improvement in my fuel usage by running at elevated pressures?
Mind you, any appreciable deterioration in tyre life would make even 8% uneconomical for me.
Higher inflation pressures reduce wear by reducing deflection of the material and thus reducing frictional heating and degredation.

The downsides to higher inflation pressures are a harsher ride, obviously, and slightly less ulttimate grip.
__________________




  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ksa8907 For This Useful Post:
Daschicken (08-01-2017), EcoCivic (07-30-2017), RedDevil (07-31-2017)
Old 07-30-2017, 12:40 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Memphis, Tn
Posts: 463
Thanks: 320
Thanked 107 Times in 81 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtamiyaphile View Post
Darin ran a bunch of coast down tests are different pressures. The result was that there was a definite point of diminishing return at around 45psi, although that was with a light weight Metro. My Renault tyres are rated for 80PSI - I run them at ~65, my rule being to run as much pressure as my vertebrae will allow.

Mechanics always let my tyres down
My tires are only rated for 44 PSI maximum, so I do not want to go over 40 PSI because of the pressure increase as the tire heats up, and if I do, the pressure on a hot summer day of prolonged driving could easily increase above 44 PSI, and I do not want to cause a blowout or damage to the tires by exceeding the maximum safe pressure.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2017, 12:42 PM   #18 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Undamaged tires won't blow until there's about 200 psi.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Daschicken (08-01-2017)
Old 07-30-2017, 05:07 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,016

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 48.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
The rated pressure is the cold pressure. The hot pressure is what it is.

Tires get hot from hysteresis loss caused by the rubber flexing. More pressure makes the rubber flex less, so the hot pressure is closer to the cold pressure.

It works the other way when the tire pressure is too low. That's why underinflated tires blow out.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to JRMichler For This Useful Post:
EcoCivic (07-30-2017), Mustang Dave (08-10-2017), PaleMelanesian (08-09-2017)
Old 07-30-2017, 06:13 PM   #20 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 49
Thanks: 5
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
I'd personally never sacrifice grip to save a little bit of fuel especially in the rainy season (although in theory higher pressure is less likely to hydroplane ).

I wonder if the tables get turned on rougher roads?
I know with mtb bike tyres lower pressure means lower resistance on dirt trails within reason.
Once you get away from the citys the roads get pretty rough in OZ

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jez77 For This Useful Post:
JockoT (07-31-2017)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com