Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-04-2017, 08:50 AM   #41 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Placard says 28psi.

Here we are at 31psi:



Here we are at 39psi (temperature delta is 0.2*C!):



I know which looks happier.

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	jumbuck_front.jpg
Views:	413
Size:	519.7 KB
ID:	22304   Click image for larger version

Name:	flir_20170804T105824.jpg
Views:	432
Size:	421.4 KB
ID:	22305  
__________________






  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oldtamiyaphile For This Useful Post:
California98Civic (08-04-2017)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-04-2017, 01:41 PM   #42 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtamiyaphile View Post
Placard says 28psi. ... I know which looks happier.
Interesting test. Thanks. But maybe you could sharpen it a little and make a thread? What were the methods and conditions of your test? There are a lot of variables here that you are not describing: starting tire temp, outdoor temp, road temp (hours of sunshine), how many minutes you drove... heck, even the number of times your turned these front wheels and the speed at which you took turns might affect these results a little.

Also, do your results matter for tire wear? Who says the resulting temperatures are a problem? Tirerack claims a 50* F increase after 30 mins driving is normal. These two temperatures might be functionally meaningless if they are well within the design limits of the tire.

I'm not trying to snipe at you. I think you have the start of a really interesting thread more rigorously testing these things.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2017, 05:15 PM   #43 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 49
Thanks: 5
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
I agree those test mean nothing with out some context, even then a laser temp gun would give a more accurate readings at each tread block for comparison.

Are they pics of the same tyre even?
Front tyre will generally be hotter than rear due to wheel alignment and steering force.
Pics are in different locations and very different road temps.

Which one do you think is happier? You don't make that clear.
To me the lower pressure pic looks far more even, the higher one is much hotter on inside edge
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2017, 05:43 PM   #44 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,998

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 49.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,711
Thanked 2,245 Times in 1,454 Posts
All I know is that I noticed a problem once because my instant FE readout was showing lower economy than the situation called for. I went over bumps and through corners and all felt fine until the very last corner before arriving at work, where the back suddenly stepped out.
There was a screw in the middle of the thread of my rear right tire and the pressure was down to 10 PSI.
I immediately aired it up (motorized pump aboard) and drove it to my nearby dealership to get it plugged properly.
Airing up was tricky because the tire was almost too hot to touch...
The other tires at 40 PSI were ambient.

Low pressure heats up and damages tires.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2017, 08:31 PM   #45 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
Interesting test. Thanks. But maybe you could sharpen it a little and make a thread? What were the methods and conditions of your test? There are a lot of variables here that you are not describing: starting tire temp, outdoor temp, road temp (hours of sunshine), how many minutes you drove... heck, even the number of times your turned these front wheels and the speed at which you took turns might affect these results a little.

Also, do your results matter for tire wear? Who says the resulting temperatures are a problem? Tirerack claims a 50* F increase after 30 mins driving is normal. These two temperatures might be functionally meaningless if they are well within the design limits of the tire.

I'm not trying to snipe at you. I think you have the start of a really interesting thread more rigorously testing these things.
These are just some preliminary results - this thread got me thinking about measuring tyre temps, rather than just going by OEM recommendations, which I've always found to lead to shoulder wear. It's not so much the overall temperature that's in play, just the temperature delta across the tyre. Overall temp will be influenced by the factors you mention, the deltas less so.

An even temperature across the tyre means each tread block is doing the same amount of work - that should be good for wear. I'll air up to max side wall next and see what happens.

Frankly, it would take weeks for testing to arrive at a rigorous conclusion - probably why no one on the internet seems to have done it. I find dozens of references to how tread wear affects dry/wet braking distances, but nothing for pressures.

Remember, the OEM placard says 'recommended' there's no possible way they can give you optimum pressures for every possible scenario.

http://www.rarespares.net.au/rarespa...oduct=92048297

If your placard lists only a single pressure (as my test car does) and you're running at high load and high speed, you're actually running much too low pressures. In my case the OEM tyres were 175's, but the car was fitted with lower profile 205's so the OEM number becomes meaningless. Even if I air up to max side wall, I'll still have more contact patch than the 175s.
__________________







Last edited by oldtamiyaphile; 08-04-2017 at 08:48 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2017, 08:43 PM   #46 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jez77 View Post
Are they pics of the same tyre even?
Front tyre will generally be hotter than rear due to wheel alignment and steering force.
Pics are in different locations and very different road temps.
Road temps are the same, you can't read thermal images like that - the colours mean completely different things across two images. They are of the same right front tyre. The second pic shows a much more consistent temperature across the tyre (outright temps I'm less interested in). More testing and a proper thread is planned.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2017, 10:07 PM   #47 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 49
Thanks: 5
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtamiyaphile View Post
Road temps are the same, you can't read thermal images like that - the colours mean completely different things across two images. They are of the same right front tyre. The second pic shows a much more consistent temperature across the tyre (outright temps I'm less interested in). More testing and a proper thread is planned.
I certainly don't see what you do.
If you say road temps are the same why would the colours not be similar that seems ridiculous and makes the images pretty much useless to compare if that is true.

You say the bottom image is more consistent temps yet it is much lighter on the inside of the tyre. Top image is a little lighter on the outside if anything but I'd say that would change depending on if you went around a left or right hand corner before you took the pic.

The bottom pic also shows the tyre hotter in the middle than the top and bottom making me think the camera is seeing it hotter because it is closer to the lens.
Meaning if your not exactly perpendicular to the tyre when you take the pic results will be inaccurate.
I'm sorry mate but I don't think that camera is going to give you the accurate results you need.
A laser temp gun would be able to give a block by block temps that you would be able to log onto a chart temps vs pressure which would give you the most accurate idea of what is going on.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2017, 06:27 AM   #48 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jez77 View Post
I certainly don't see what you do.
If you say road temps are the same why would the colours not be similar that seems ridiculous and makes the images pretty much useless to compare if that is true.
No it doesn't work that way. What would be ridiculous would be to have a single colour scale across all your images. My camera operates at -272 to +250*C. If black always meant -272 and white always meant 250, then the vast majority of images would have next to no definition and the whole thing would be useless.

The temp scale can be locked, but is normally dynamic. These pictures are really only intended for my own use, they don't really mean much without access to the raw point data.

Also, the road temps are similar, that's not to say the temp of my driveway is as high as the road temp.

I can always come back to an image and get spot temperatures using the software, weeks, months and years later. Again, the second image only varies by 0.2*C across the whole tyre - even if the colouration is a quite stark. If you understand about emissivity there's no non contact method that's going to be 100% perfect. My FLIR camera tells me the boiling point of water is 99.9*C- I'm pretty happy with that. The IR temp gun has the same limitations except I can see where my potential errors are, as well as save that point in time for future integration.

I also have a durometer that can be used to verify results.
__________________







Last edited by oldtamiyaphile; 08-05-2017 at 07:12 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2017, 06:49 AM   #49 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Just to help every one get their head around how an IR camera works, this is the inside of my freezer:



Even if there's next to no temperature variation, the camera will make it look like there is.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	flir_20170805T184431.jpg
Views:	419
Size:	226.0 KB
ID:	22306  
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2017, 07:53 AM   #50 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 794
Thanks: 4
Thanked 388 Times in 237 Posts
I guess I have to say it again:

Inflation pressure is just one of many variables when it comes to tire wear - and it isn't the most important. You can get even wear on underinflated tires as well as overinflated tires. You can also get uneven wear on properly inflated tires.

So even wear is NOT an indication that the inflation pressure is where it ought to be. And uneven wear is NOT an indication that the pressure is wrong.

__________________
CapriRacer

Visit my website: www.BarrysTireTech.com
New Content every month!
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com