02-28-2021, 04:54 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Florida
Posts: 12
Thanks: 8
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Brand new to the forum. My wife and I are looking at getting an '09-'13 Chevy Silverado Hybrid. So I'm digging around the internet, and I ran across this thread.
The history on GM hybrid pickups and SUVs is interesting.
'04-'05 mild-hybrid Silverados that they later bought back from customers.
'08-'13 Yukon/Tahoe/Escalade hybrid SUVs
'09-13 Sierra/Silverado full hybrid pickup w/a 1.9kWhr NiMH pack 25%ish mpg improvement
'17 Cali only, and '18 US-wide Silverado hybrid with a 0.5kWhr Li-Ion pack and only 13% improvement on mpg. 1/2 as efficient but 2/3 the cost.
Compare that to the current F-150 that is a 1.5kWhr Li-Ion pack, and only adds about 30hp and 20% mpg efficiency to the base motor.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-28-2021, 10:19 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,697 Times in 1,515 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
The smaller engine could then be transverse mounted making the truck front wheel drive, with the electric motor(s) powering the rear. No more drive line. Brakes would need less maintenance as the regen does most of the stopping.
|
Just look at what Volvo does with its XC90 which has roughly the size of a Tahoe. On a sidenote, it also has a pancake motor between the ICE and transmission.
Quote:
Our first hybrids should have been trucks, but instead we got the smallest cars. How did that happen?
|
Blame it on a lack of incentives for fleets to go hybrid back in the day. IIRC there were hybrid buses in the '90s even in my country, but it didn't succeed due to a lack of incentives too.
|
|
|
03-01-2021, 03:44 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,605
Thanks: 326
Thanked 2,152 Times in 1,456 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazclrint
Brand new to the forum. My wife and I are looking at getting an '09-'13 Chevy Silverado Hybrid. So I'm digging around the internet, and I ran across this thread.
The history on GM hybrid pickups and SUVs is interesting.
'04-'05 mild-hybrid Silverados that they later bought back from customers.
'08-'13 Yukon/Tahoe/Escalade hybrid SUVs
'09-13 Sierra/Silverado full hybrid pickup w/a 1.9kWhr NiMH pack 25%ish mpg improvement
'17 Cali only, and '18 US-wide Silverado hybrid with a 0.5kWhr Li-Ion pack and only 13% improvement on mpg. 1/2 as efficient but 2/3 the cost.
Compare that to the current F-150 that is a 1.5kWhr Li-Ion pack, and only adds about 30hp and 20% mpg efficiency to the base motor.
|
The '09-13 Sierra hybrids were a solid improvement on the standards version. I think the biggest issue was many people look at highway ratings and say "why should I get a hybrid to only save 2 mpg" - not thinking that 2 mpg is 10% and city improvement was 33%.
It was a $3,000 - $4,000 option with a $2200 federal tax credit. That is less than a 5 year payback even with $2.50 a gallon gas so the hybrid should have been a simple choice.
I wish they had made a hybrid version of the Chevy Express.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JSH For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-01-2021, 04:03 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Phoenix, AZ area
Posts: 318
Thanks: 19
Thanked 181 Times in 126 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazclrint
Brand new to the forum. My wife and I are looking at getting an '09-'13 Chevy Silverado Hybrid. So I'm digging around the internet, and I ran across this thread.
The history on GM hybrid pickups and SUVs is interesting.
'04-'05 mild-hybrid Silverados that they later bought back from customers.
'08-'13 Yukon/Tahoe/Escalade hybrid SUVs
'09-13 Sierra/Silverado full hybrid pickup w/a 1.9kWhr NiMH pack 25%ish mpg improvement
'17 Cali only, and '18 US-wide Silverado hybrid with a 0.5kWhr Li-Ion pack and only 13% improvement on mpg. 1/2 as efficient but 2/3 the cost.
Compare that to the current F-150 that is a 1.5kWhr Li-Ion pack, and only adds about 30hp and 20% mpg efficiency to the base motor.
|
Hard pass on all 2013 and earlier GM hybrid trucks. Horrible battery life, and other common/expensive problems. They have horrible battery management, and few dealerships have any competency with them.
If you insist, budget $5K for repairs.
__________________
|
|
|
03-01-2021, 08:31 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
home of the odd vehicles
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 506
Thanked 868 Times in 654 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by S Keith
Hard pass on all 2013 and earlier GM hybrid trucks. Horrible battery life, and other common/expensive problems. They have horrible battery management, and few dealerships have any competency with them.
If you insist, budget $5K for repairs.
|
They really get bank for those things
https://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/d...7913/overview/
Not that long ago the hybrid could be half the price used compared to a “standard “ model
|
|
|
03-02-2021, 12:49 AM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,697 Times in 1,515 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH
The '09-13 Sierra hybrids were a solid improvement on the standards version. I think the biggest issue was many people look at highway ratings and say "why should I get a hybrid to only save 2 mpg" - not thinking that 2 mpg is 10% and city improvement was 33%.
|
I remember both the Silverado and Tahoe were available only as a hybrid in Ecuador by then, as there were no displacement limits for hybrid vehicles to benefit from lower import duties there. When it comes to the fuel savings, even though they may seem negligible at a first glance while looking only at the extra MPG instead of considering the percentage too, I remember seeing claims that a hybrid Tahoe could get better city MPG than a non-hybrid Camry.
Quote:
I wish they had made a hybrid version of the Chevy Express.
|
Considering the hybrid setup had been offered only for the Silverado and Sierra 1500, in contrast to the 2500 and 3500 having the Diesel option available (and IIRC the Express followed the same approach), seems like the idea about Diesels and hybrids being inherently opposite to each other was already too consolidated on the customers' mindset. OTOH for vans, as their buyers are usually more job-oriented than for trucks, they were supposed to justify it easier. On a sidenote, for users of conversion vans, presumably the hybrid approach could also be reasonable to use the auxiliary electric power to drive accessories just like those electric APUs now fitted to some big rigs.
|
|
|
03-02-2021, 11:24 AM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,272
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,572 Times in 2,836 Posts
|
There were hybrid Chevy SUVs. GM may still offer them in premium packages. At that point thr hybrid badge is just a status symbol.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
03-02-2021, 04:53 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by S Keith
Hard pass on all 2013 and earlier GM hybrid trucks. Horrible battery life, and other common/expensive problems. They have horrible battery management, and few dealerships have any competency with them.
If you insist, budget $5K for repairs.
|
Do you have first hand experience? We have a 2012 and haven't had any issues with it the last 40k+miles we've had it. Anything I should be looking out for? I believe these use Toyota Prius battery NiMH cells.
__________________
|
|
|
03-03-2021, 02:04 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,333
Thanks: 24,453
Thanked 7,394 Times in 4,789 Posts
|
F-150 hybrid, 2021
Ford's F-150 hybrid is currently on sale. Killer torque. Tasty mpgs. Four- kilowatts of power available at camping or worksite. It's a 'real' hybrid.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-03-2021, 02:46 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,845
Thanks: 4,333
Thanked 4,489 Times in 3,452 Posts
|
Quote:
Debuting in the refreshed-for-2021 F-150, the PowerBoost hybrid pairs Ford's twin-turbocharged 3.5-liter V-6 with a 47-hp electric motor, making this the highest-output powertrain in the current F-150 lineup. The motor is sandwiched between the engine and the stand*ard 10-speed automatic, while a 1.5-kWh lithium-ion battery tucks under the bed. The battery may seem a bit small for a vehicle of this size, but Ford chose it because it's easy to package and less costly than larger packs, and its weight won't considerably impact the all-important towing and payload capacities. Combined output for this powertrain is a stout 430 horses and 570 pound-feet of torque—gains of 30 ponies and 70 pound-feet versus the updated nonhybrid EcoBoost 3.5-liter.
At 5794 pounds, our four-wheel-drive Lariat weighed 200 pounds more than the last F-150 Limited we reviewed, yet its solid 5.4-second run to 60 mph means it's fleeter than most half-ton trucks... the max payload and towing capacities for the hybrid are impressive, at 2120 and 12,700 pounds, respectively.
The motor isn't designed to provide meaningful acceleration on its own, but it does allow for short periods of electric cruising at low speeds. Transitions from gas to electric power are almost imperceptible, as is the changeover from regenerative to friction braking. The hybrid scores 24 mpg on the EPA's combined cycle, 4 mpg more than a regular EcoBoost 3.5 F-150 manages.
The hybrid option can be had on any F-150 crew cab for a somewhat reasonable $2500 to $4495, depending on the trim level. That equates to base prices of $42,840 to $77,845.
|
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...y-the-numbers/
Getting closer to what I envision, but I want to see something like a series hybrid with a small 4 cylinder engine and no transmission.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|