10-02-2015, 12:34 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,669
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,188 Times in 814 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
That makes sense because that rim appeared to be GM equipment.
And that is pretty bad because that means it not a cheap Chinese wheel made out of recycled beer cans.
|
Except the extra set of 20" factory Dodge wheels I have that I didn't use have "made in China" proudly cast into them. I would bet if the GM ones don't say "made in China" it's only because they actually were but told them not to print it on the wheel itself.
In defense of the low profile tires, my Aspen handles much better with the 20's compared to the 17's but it's only really noticeable if I was autocrossing the thing. Then again I was the only guy with a pickup at the autocross events I entered LOL!
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
10-02-2015, 01:37 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Lean Burn Cruiser!
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 936
Thanks: 840
Thanked 491 Times in 310 Posts
|
If I was running a 20-24" rim, you can bet that I would have it wrapped in a 35-40" tire. No rubber bands here, no sir.
 (37x13.50 on 22x14s)
Yes sir! 
|
|
|
10-02-2015, 10:44 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,312
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,584 Times in 2,845 Posts
|
That's not low profile, that's just gigantic.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
10-02-2015, 10:56 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,312
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,584 Times in 2,845 Posts
|
I would not put it past GM to lie through omission on something like that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hersbird
In defense of the low profile tires, my Aspen handles much better with the 20's compared to the 17's but it's only really noticeable if I was autocrossing the thing. Then again I was the only guy with a pickup at the autocross events I entered LOL!
|
Yes, putting taller wheels helps up to a point.
The over all #1 thing you can do to a 3rd generation Camaro like mine or firebird or T/A to increase the lateral skid pad G forces the car will hold is to put 17 inch wheels on it. But you still continue to run a 26 to 27 inch over all diameter tire (not exactly rubber bands).
You can go larger than 17 but it become hit or miss with that platform for some reason.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
10-02-2015, 11:10 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 29,410
Thanks: 8,365
Thanked 9,125 Times in 7,534 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdb
I still don't understand the allure of gigantic rims + rubber band tires. I think they look stupid.
|
It affects 'turn in', the time it takes for the vehicle to respond to steering wheel input.
|
|
|
10-02-2015, 11:29 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 59
Mazda - '11 Mazda Mazda2 Touring 90 day: 38.93 mpg (US)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 15 Times in 11 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdb
This is something that has never made sense to me. Smaller diameter rim means more tire is required to obtain the same overall diameter. More tire means more tire material - rubber, belts, whatnot. And yet they charge less for them. Boggles the mind.
|
Supply vs demand prolly. Maybe just a more common size rim so a larger market.
__________________
|
|
|
10-02-2015, 11:50 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 812 Times in 595 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
Caused by a stone on the road inside a construction zone. Could happen to any one who drives through road work.
|
I can show you a similar thing (large crack in the side bead) with a regular profile tire, from hitting a rock that rolled down the mountainside.
|
|
|
10-03-2015, 08:28 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 831
Thanks: 44
Thanked 104 Times in 80 Posts
|
Super low profile tires are the stupidest thing ever. Is there a handling benefit? maybe a very small one, at the expense of a harsher ride. I just can't see going any lower than a 50. And people that go lower than that on a truck should be beaten. It looks like ****.
|
|
|
10-03-2015, 11:23 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
lurker's apprentice
Join Date: May 2008
Location: the Perimeter
Posts: 942
PlainJane - '12 Toyota Tacoma Base 4WD Access Cab 90 day: 20.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 504
Thanked 226 Times in 173 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
It affects 'turn in', the time it takes for the vehicle to respond to steering wheel input.
|
Maybe. There are a lot of variables in play there, even just in the wheel/tire realm.
|
|
|
10-03-2015, 12:21 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 29,410
Thanks: 8,365
Thanked 9,125 Times in 7,534 Posts
|
It's merely the only thing I could think of in favor.
The best turn-in I've had was on 145/15s on 5.5" rims. But they couldn't keep up with the brakes (downhill in the mountains), so I went to 165-50/15.
|
|
|
|