Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-02-2015, 12:34 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,653

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 301
Thanked 1,178 Times in 807 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
That makes sense because that rim appeared to be GM equipment.
And that is pretty bad because that means it not a cheap Chinese wheel made out of recycled beer cans.
Except the extra set of 20" factory Dodge wheels I have that I didn't use have "made in China" proudly cast into them. I would bet if the GM ones don't say "made in China" it's only because they actually were but told them not to print it on the wheel itself.

In defense of the low profile tires, my Aspen handles much better with the 20's compared to the 17's but it's only really noticeable if I was autocrossing the thing. Then again I was the only guy with a pickup at the autocross events I entered LOL!

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-02-2015, 01:37 PM   #12 (permalink)
Lean Burn Cruiser!
 
BabyDiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 931

Big Blazin' - '88 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Silverado
SUV
90 day: 14.97 mpg (US)

Chili - '00 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
Team Honda
House of Tudor
Team Streamliner
90 day: 72.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 835
Thanked 490 Times in 309 Posts
If I was running a 20-24" rim, you can bet that I would have it wrapped in a 35-40" tire. No rubber bands here, no sir.

(37x13.50 on 22x14s)

Yes sir!
__________________



Remember, thank a fellow EM'er for a helpful post!!!
I hypermile better in my cowboy boots

Past threads:
ZX2 modding thread
Ecomodder's Top 10: How they do it!
ZX2 Aerodynamics: Shooting for 0.15 Cd
ZX2 coast-down testing for Cd & Crr
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 10:44 PM   #13 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
That's not low profile, that's just gigantic.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 10:56 PM   #14 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
I would not put it past GM to lie through omission on something like that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hersbird View Post
In defense of the low profile tires, my Aspen handles much better with the 20's compared to the 17's but it's only really noticeable if I was autocrossing the thing. Then again I was the only guy with a pickup at the autocross events I entered LOL!
Yes, putting taller wheels helps up to a point.
The over all #1 thing you can do to a 3rd generation Camaro like mine or firebird or T/A to increase the lateral skid pad G forces the car will hold is to put 17 inch wheels on it. But you still continue to run a 26 to 27 inch over all diameter tire (not exactly rubber bands).
You can go larger than 17 but it become hit or miss with that platform for some reason.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 11:10 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,703
Thanks: 7,777
Thanked 8,586 Times in 7,070 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdb
I still don't understand the allure of gigantic rims + rubber band tires. I think they look stupid.
It affects 'turn in', the time it takes for the vehicle to respond to steering wheel input.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 11:29 PM   #16 (permalink)
apc
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 59

Mazda - '11 Mazda Mazda2 Touring
90 day: 38.93 mpg (US)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 15 Times in 11 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdb View Post
This is something that has never made sense to me. Smaller diameter rim means more tire is required to obtain the same overall diameter. More tire means more tire material - rubber, belts, whatnot. And yet they charge less for them. Boggles the mind.
Supply vs demand prolly. Maybe just a more common size rim so a larger market.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 11:50 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Caused by a stone on the road inside a construction zone. Could happen to any one who drives through road work.
I can show you a similar thing (large crack in the side bead) with a regular profile tire, from hitting a rock that rolled down the mountainside.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2015, 08:28 AM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 829
Thanks: 44
Thanked 104 Times in 80 Posts
Super low profile tires are the stupidest thing ever. Is there a handling benefit? maybe a very small one, at the expense of a harsher ride. I just can't see going any lower than a 50. And people that go lower than that on a truck should be beaten. It looks like ****.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2015, 11:23 AM   #19 (permalink)
wdb
lurker's apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: the Perimeter
Posts: 942

PlainJane - '12 Toyota Tacoma Base 4WD Access Cab
90 day: 20.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 504
Thanked 226 Times in 173 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
It affects 'turn in', the time it takes for the vehicle to respond to steering wheel input.
Maybe. There are a lot of variables in play there, even just in the wheel/tire realm.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2015, 12:21 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,703
Thanks: 7,777
Thanked 8,586 Times in 7,070 Posts
It's merely the only thing I could think of in favor.

The best turn-in I've had was on 145/15s on 5.5" rims. But they couldn't keep up with the brakes (downhill in the mountains), so I went to 165-50/15.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com