11-27-2020, 03:34 AM
|
#41 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
Yes, CFD software is crazy expensive.
And regarding Blender, that program is flat out amazing, but doesn't get any respect in the 3D community because it's free.
I have discussed the program with other 3D nerds, and felt like I was trying to SELL it it to them.
Despite being free, they don't want to even try it.
My current computer ( old ) won't run Blender .
I keep being amazed at what it can do.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
12-05-2020, 06:03 PM
|
#42 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
So, is it possible to add an aerodynamic fence to direct airflow that is about to go turbulent on bodywork ?
I recall MetroMPG had some tufts on one his boat tail prototypes, in which the airflow was moving towards a low pressure area and going turbulent.
I think it was mentioned that fences would do nothing.
If they could be made to direct the airflow, would they also create drag in someway ?
Here is a crude example.
A would be airflow going turbulent.
B would be airflow channeled into a new path .
With red being the 'fences '.
|
|
|
12-05-2020, 07:29 PM
|
#43 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,882 Times in 7,329 Posts
|
I fail at finding an example, but I've seen curved strakes on an underbody to sweep air sideways to behind the front wheels. Either it doesn't work or only works in the underbody plenum.
If they follow the predominant airflow, wouldn't they be vortex generators in crossflow conditions.?
If you can carve away the body, airflow can be focused into a jet. My brain needs a better example than the 1959 Chevy.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
12-05-2020, 08:32 PM
|
#44 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
I fail at finding an example, but I've seen curved strakes on an underbody to sweep air sideways to behind the front wheels. Either it doesn't work or only works in the underbody plenum.
If they follow the predominant airflow, wouldn't they be vortex generators in crossflow conditions.?
If you can carve away the body, airflow can be focused into a jet. My brain needs a better example than the 1959 Chevy.
|
Yes. My thoughts too about acting as VG in crossflow conditions.
A 1959 Chevy ?
The Impala, correct ? I can't find it now, but I saw a tuft test of that car.
Also, the Alfa Romeo BAT 7 car comes to mind.
|
|
|
12-05-2020, 11:01 PM
|
#45 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,882 Times in 7,329 Posts
|
'59s all had the 'cat eye' taillights. Here's a perhaps better example, the Pontiac Banshee. Not a tacked-on feature, it's almost an external duct.
https://www.pontiactransamforum.com/...t-car.571/full
I'm thinking of the groove that starts in the middle of the door that feeds into a cavity. I have no idea about the airflow around that feature.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
12-05-2020, 11:31 PM
|
#46 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,060
Thanks: 107
Thanked 1,605 Times in 1,136 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd
So, is it possible to add an aerodynamic fence to direct airflow that is about to go turbulent on bodywork ?
I recall MetroMPG had some tufts on one his boat tail prototypes, in which the airflow was moving towards a low pressure area and going turbulent.
I think it was mentioned that fences would do nothing.
If they could be made to direct the airflow, would they also create drag in someway ?
Here is a crude example.
A would be airflow going turbulent.
B would be airflow channeled into a new path .
With red being the 'fences '.
|
What do you mean by "going turbulent"? Do you mean "separating"?
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 12:24 AM
|
#47 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,882 Times in 7,329 Posts
|
Isn't attached turbulent a valid category? If not, that's your real scandal here, not the default template.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 01:19 AM
|
#48 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,060
Thanks: 107
Thanked 1,605 Times in 1,136 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
Isn't attached turbulent a valid category? If not, that's your real scandal here, not the default template.
|
I doubt that Cd is talking about a transition from a laminar to turbulent boundary layer.
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 02:23 AM
|
#49 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,882 Times in 7,329 Posts
|
Leaving that question to Cd...
Quote:
If they could be made to direct the airflow, would they also create drag in someway ?
|
Examples I can think of vary in scale from small (dimples and VGs), to large (Cybertruck's longitudinal edges). Reattachment may net zero. It all seems to be about pressure drag. Is skin friction consistent or does it vary over the wetted area?
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 09:11 AM
|
#50 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
Sorry for being confusing.
What I'm wondering is if a 'fence' was directly in the path of air that is headed to a low pressure area and the fence is able to redirect and straighten it, would you still have some spillover that would trip over the fence and go turbulent.
And Julian, yes, I meant air separating and then going turbulent.
BTW, I recently came across your A pillar " side curtain " video.
This is just what I was after, since I am trying to change the direction of tufts on the sude of the car.
I'm already making plans to create some.
So I'd like to ask what is happening around the sides of our cars' A pillar windows as the tufts point towards the roof, rather than straight back.
I know this is due to the tufts being pulled to where there is a change in air pressure ( low pressure, correct ? )
But if the tufts are pointed straight up to the roof, but are steady and not fluttering, this seems to show that the airflow is attached - but since they are pointed away from the rest of the flow, is this a sign that this is a problem area that could be corrected ?
|
|
|
|