Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-27-2020, 03:34 AM   #41 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Yes, CFD software is crazy expensive.
And regarding Blender, that program is flat out amazing, but doesn't get any respect in the 3D community because it's free.
I have discussed the program with other 3D nerds, and felt like I was trying to SELL it it to them.
Despite being free, they don't want to even try it.

My current computer ( old ) won't run Blender .
I keep being amazed at what it can do.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-05-2020, 06:03 PM   #42 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
So, is it possible to add an aerodynamic fence to direct airflow that is about to go turbulent on bodywork ?
I recall MetroMPG had some tufts on one his boat tail prototypes, in which the airflow was moving towards a low pressure area and going turbulent.
I think it was mentioned that fences would do nothing.

If they could be made to direct the airflow, would they also create drag in someway ?

Here is a crude example.
A would be airflow going turbulent.
B would be airflow channeled into a new path .
With red being the 'fences '.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	20201205_155804.jpg
Views:	8
Size:	23.1 KB
ID:	29705  
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2020, 07:29 PM   #43 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,882 Times in 7,329 Posts
I fail at finding an example, but I've seen curved strakes on an underbody to sweep air sideways to behind the front wheels. Either it doesn't work or only works in the underbody plenum.

If they follow the predominant airflow, wouldn't they be vortex generators in crossflow conditions.?

If you can carve away the body, airflow can be focused into a jet. My brain needs a better example than the 1959 Chevy.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2020, 08:32 PM   #44 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
I fail at finding an example, but I've seen curved strakes on an underbody to sweep air sideways to behind the front wheels. Either it doesn't work or only works in the underbody plenum.

If they follow the predominant airflow, wouldn't they be vortex generators in crossflow conditions.?

If you can carve away the body, airflow can be focused into a jet. My brain needs a better example than the 1959 Chevy.
Yes. My thoughts too about acting as VG in crossflow conditions.
A 1959 Chevy ?
The Impala, correct ? I can't find it now, but I saw a tuft test of that car.
Also, the Alfa Romeo BAT 7 car comes to mind.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2020, 11:01 PM   #45 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,882 Times in 7,329 Posts
'59s all had the 'cat eye' taillights. Here's a perhaps better example, the Pontiac Banshee. Not a tacked-on feature, it's almost an external duct.


https://www.pontiactransamforum.com/...t-car.571/full

I'm thinking of the groove that starts in the middle of the door that feeds into a cavity. I have no idea about the airflow around that feature.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2020, 11:31 PM   #46 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,060
Thanks: 107
Thanked 1,605 Times in 1,136 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd View Post
So, is it possible to add an aerodynamic fence to direct airflow that is about to go turbulent on bodywork ?
I recall MetroMPG had some tufts on one his boat tail prototypes, in which the airflow was moving towards a low pressure area and going turbulent.
I think it was mentioned that fences would do nothing.

If they could be made to direct the airflow, would they also create drag in someway ?

Here is a crude example.
A would be airflow going turbulent.
B would be airflow channeled into a new path .
With red being the 'fences '.
What do you mean by "going turbulent"? Do you mean "separating"?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2020, 12:24 AM   #47 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,882 Times in 7,329 Posts
Isn't attached turbulent a valid category? If not, that's your real scandal here, not the default template.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2020, 01:19 AM   #48 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,060
Thanks: 107
Thanked 1,605 Times in 1,136 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
Isn't attached turbulent a valid category? If not, that's your real scandal here, not the default template.
I doubt that Cd is talking about a transition from a laminar to turbulent boundary layer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2020, 02:23 AM   #49 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,882 Times in 7,329 Posts
Leaving that question to Cd...
Quote:
If they could be made to direct the airflow, would they also create drag in someway ?
Examples I can think of vary in scale from small (dimples and VGs), to large (Cybertruck's longitudinal edges). Reattachment may net zero. It all seems to be about pressure drag. Is skin friction consistent or does it vary over the wetted area?
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2020, 09:11 AM   #50 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Sorry for being confusing.
What I'm wondering is if a 'fence' was directly in the path of air that is headed to a low pressure area and the fence is able to redirect and straighten it, would you still have some spillover that would trip over the fence and go turbulent.
And Julian, yes, I meant air separating and then going turbulent.
BTW, I recently came across your A pillar " side curtain " video.
This is just what I was after, since I am trying to change the direction of tufts on the sude of the car.
I'm already making plans to create some.

So I'd like to ask what is happening around the sides of our cars' A pillar windows as the tufts point towards the roof, rather than straight back.
I know this is due to the tufts being pulled to where there is a change in air pressure ( low pressure, correct ? )
But if the tufts are pointed straight up to the roof, but are steady and not fluttering, this seems to show that the airflow is attached - but since they are pointed away from the rest of the flow, is this a sign that this is a problem area that could be corrected ?

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com