04-13-2013, 09:05 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: 90066
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Would Dynamaxion full wrap around be legal for old box van?
1991 dodge ram b250 boxy van legality of buckminister type teardrop total wraparound?
So i have the box on wheels dodge ram b250 1991.
Was looking at all possible incremental mods to fix wheel etc and then it hit me.
Would it be legal to simply wrap a new larger skin right around the box shape using spacers etc?
I would go a for a buckminister fuller Dynamaxion type teardrop shape.
If i make lights visible or do new ones are there any legal restrictions on the necessary increase in lenght and width Ii would add to the external dimensions?
Is there a max width for vans and max length?
Would need long rear taper, wider sides at mid point and extension of front to near parabola.
Thanks
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
04-13-2013, 10:15 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
If adding frontal area without benefiting from it at all via more interior volume, you now have to make it sleek enough to overcome the added weight and size.
|
|
|
04-14-2013, 12:53 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: 90066
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee
If adding frontal area without benefiting from it at all via more interior volume, you now have to make it sleek enough to overcome the added weight and size.
|
Yes but assuming a cd go go down from approximately .40 of a ford aerostar which is far more arodynamic than my box or worse to 3/4 that or much better if i only increase frontal area by 10% it is a big win.
|
|
|
04-14-2013, 01:03 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
That makes your job tougher and reduces potential gain... but whatever floats your boat! I'd just do a pan and boat tail.
|
|
|
04-17-2013, 02:12 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,520
Thanks: 8,073
Thanked 8,870 Times in 7,322 Posts
|
I'll reply here instead of here, because Frank's cat always makes me smile.
I've entertained the same thought about my Clark Cortez motor home. It weighs 9000lb. If I replace the steel body with wood/bamboo and a lightweight interior maybe I could get it to 6000lb.
For your purposes, though; maybe a 'Class-C' approach–where you retain the original cowl dash and windshield and replace everything from the door hinges back?
I did this for another thread you can find here:
I'm hampered by my facilities; all my tools are jammed into a little shed. How are you fixed for shop space?
Last edited by freebeard; 04-17-2013 at 02:34 AM..
|
|
|
04-19-2013, 02:08 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
live, breath, Isuzu-Ds
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: oregon
Posts: 231
Thanks: 1
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
|
8'6" is the limit for how wide you can go..
box vans are commonly ((very close)) to this limit when there dully wheels on the rear.
so for any one making a home made trailer don't make it wider then 8'6"
LOL i know some one that did that LOL
any thing over that and you need permit's of one type or another.
__________________
1 86 T\D trooper with rare GEN 3 rods TRANS FIXED NOW DD
1 86 4WD 5sp pup is 2.3L gas, but plan on 2.2L diesel repower
1 91 trop, long term plan is a group buy of imported Isuzu 4JB1-T 2.8L I-4 engines, hoping to get price down to 2K not 3K plus
1993 sidekick my MPG toy, epa rating 26.
i get 29/31 with stock drive train.
Last edited by trooper Tdiesel; 04-19-2013 at 02:13 AM..
|
|
|
04-19-2013, 01:45 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
PSmodder lurker
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chino
Posts: 1,605
Thanks: 26
Thanked 908 Times in 522 Posts
|
|
|
|
04-20-2013, 02:24 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,256
Thanks: 24,382
Thanked 7,359 Times in 4,759 Posts
|
frontal area
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoeco
Yes but assuming a cd go go down from approximately .40 of a ford aerostar which is far more arodynamic than my box or worse to 3/4 that or much better if i only increase frontal area by 10% it is a big win.
|
The big-boys say "don't go there!"
There's no need to inflate the frontal area to get the streamlining.
I've got the T-100 to Cd 0.208 with the 30" boat tail,and Cd 0.151 with the gap-filled 'Viking' full-boat-tailed trailer.I've added zero frontal area.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
04-20-2013, 04:26 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,178
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by botsapper
|
Great!
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects
2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft
You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
|
|
|
04-21-2013, 01:08 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,520
Thanks: 8,073
Thanked 8,870 Times in 7,322 Posts
|
Humph, the Original Poster hasn't updated that other thread since December. But it's 9 pages long; here's the highlights:
Botsapper's contribution hotlinked from the other thread:
This exercise shows the modification a box van needs to approximate The Template.
This shows a car with fairly crappy sides having it's CD cut in half with no additional frontal area.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
|
|
|