Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-14-2017, 09:33 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Memphis, Tn
Posts: 463
Thanks: 320
Thanked 107 Times in 81 Posts
Would running lean save fuel?

I know that an air fuel ratio of 14.7:1 is in stoichiomitry, obviously running rich burns more fuel, and running lean reduces performance. But what if a car ran at 15.5 or 16:1 air to fuel ratio at all times, except when cold, under heavy load or at full throttle? I would think it would get better mileage, at the cost of worse throttle response and higher temps. Why is the air to fuel ratio so rich while cruising? Could the engine not do the same amount of work with a leaner air to fuel ratio, or would fuel consumption increase? Thanks, this always confused me.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-14-2017, 10:06 PM   #2 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,874

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 495
Thanked 863 Times in 650 Posts
Law and emissions
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rmay635703 For This Useful Post:
EcoCivic (07-15-2017)
Old 07-14-2017, 10:48 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Stubby79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,747

Firefly EV - '98 Pontiac Firefly EV
90 day: 107.65 mpg (US)

Little Boy Blue - '05 Toyota Echo
90 day: 33.35 mpg (US)

BlueZ - '19 Nissan 370Z Sport
90 day: 17.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 75
Thanked 576 Times in 426 Posts
This is where your EGR helps...lets you run less air and fuel without having to change your AFR.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Stubby79 For This Useful Post:
EcoCivic (07-15-2017)
Old 07-15-2017, 04:06 AM   #4 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,175

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 269
Thanked 3,522 Times in 2,796 Posts
I tuned the carburetor on my gasoline powered suburban with the aid of my AEM wide band O2 meter for lean burn and it made about a 20% improvement over a properly tuned carb.
It works.

You do not want lean burn at high load, I burned all the exhaust valves on a fuel injected engine because I didn't know how to make it run rich at high load.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
EcoCivic (07-15-2017), Frank Lee (07-15-2017), rmay635703 (07-15-2017)
Old 07-15-2017, 09:20 AM   #5 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,874

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 495
Thanked 863 Times in 650 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
I tuned the carburetor on my gasoline powered suburban with the aid of my AEM wide band O2 meter for lean burn and it made about a 20% improvement over a properly tuned carb.
It works
Makes you wonder if having your car make a little more NOx but reducing fuel use 20% might reduce overall emissions since your taking a chunk out of the 300 grams of NOx per gallon the refinery makes?
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rmay635703 For This Useful Post:
EcoCivic (07-15-2017), Fat Charlie (07-26-2017)
Old 07-15-2017, 09:53 AM   #6 (permalink)
CruzeMTgrind
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 139

BlueBawls - '14 Chevrolet Cruze Eco
90 day: 48.47 mpg (US)

Eddie - '02 Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703 View Post
Makes you wonder if having your car make a little more NOx but reducing fuel use 20% might reduce overall emissions since your taking a chunk out of the 300 grams of NOx per gallon the refinery makes?
That matches my thought process. Not sure how much NOx a car in lean burn mode would produce. But 20% less fuel use should make up for that in my eyes especially if what your saying about NOx the refinery makes is accurate.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ecocruze For This Useful Post:
EcoCivic (07-15-2017)
Old 07-15-2017, 09:55 AM   #7 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,175

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 269
Thanked 3,522 Times in 2,796 Posts
Where I live we do not have a NOx problem.
It's flat as far as you can see and one of the windest places in the united states.

Unfortunately EPA only cares about vehicle tail pipe.
I had no idea the refinery made 300gm of NOx per gallon.
Heck it's almost like the government is intentionally making the problem worse.

I have been around oil refineries and they do smell like NOx, but I didn't even think it was possible to release that much.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
EcoCivic (07-15-2017)
Old 07-15-2017, 11:11 AM   #8 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,630

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*´ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
90 day: 587.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 74
Thanked 701 Times in 444 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
Quote:
300 grams of NOx per gallon the refinery makes
That sounds extremely high. Do You have a source for this?
__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2017, 11:47 AM   #9 (permalink)
Engine-Off-Coast
 
Natalya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 561

Red 2000 Insight (2017 through 2019) - '00 Honda Insight 5MT
90 day: 64.72 mpg (US)

Red 2000 Lithium Insight (2020) - '00 Honda Insight LTO
90 day: 71.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 223
Thanked 305 Times in 175 Posts
If you do this on a 25-year-old car in USA then I'm pretty sure you're in the clear when it comes to emissions regulations.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2017, 12:37 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,652

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 300
Thanked 1,176 Times in 806 Posts
Anyone who thinks the government produces regulations to help the average person is crazy. Maybe 100 years ago. The regulations are written by lobbies and special interest groups to carve out an advantage for themselves. Who benefits from using more gas and adding expensive parts to cars? In the name of reducing NOx which supposedly helps the common man. Must be nice every time the common man gets "helped" a CEO makes another billion.

  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hersbird For This Useful Post:
ecocruze (07-15-2017), Fingie (07-16-2017)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com