12-20-2007, 10:41 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: montana
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
xfi metro camshaft
Gents. According to Haynes manual and the two camshafts sitting beside my desk, the lobe height on the 91 and earlier metro camshaft is the same as on the xfi camshaft. Are they the same camshaft?
Last edited by gwahir; 12-20-2007 at 10:44 PM..
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
12-20-2007, 11:03 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
That VX guy!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mini Soda
Posts: 829
Thanks: 75
Thanked 80 Times in 53 Posts
|
Once MetroMPG chimes in, you should have a good answer.
Welcome to the board as well. 
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
12-20-2007, 11:10 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
Where do you live? I actually just heard today that MK3 base cars sold in Canada were all XFi spec. It's hard to find reliable info - I should say it' hard to find verifiable info.
The XFi cam I put in my car had lobe heights in the 39.628 to 39.788 mm range, which is what I was expecting for an XFi. The original cam I took out had taller lobes.
|
|
|
|
|
12-20-2007, 11:15 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Dartmouth 2010
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447
Thanks: 92
Thanked 122 Times in 90 Posts
|
If they're the same was there not an XFi or is the difference in the tranny?
|
|
|
|
|
12-20-2007, 11:17 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
Canada never had the XFi badge. Don't ask me why not. I wish I'd been paying more attention to these cars when they were still selling them.
|
|
|
|
|
12-20-2007, 11:20 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Dartmouth 2010
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447
Thanks: 92
Thanked 122 Times in 90 Posts
|
Time to scour the internetz! Check fuel ratings and compare?
|
|
|
|
|
12-20-2007, 11:27 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
Already checked: Canada's ratings only go back to '95. And I'm not sure if the info I was given applies to the US cars.
|
|
|
|
|
12-20-2007, 11:41 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: montana
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I live in western Montana. The 39mm height is correct for both the xfi and the 91 and earlier metro. That does not mean that they are the same cam as there may be other differences. If they are the same, it would make it a lot easier to get an 'xfi' cam!
|
|
|
|
|
12-20-2007, 11:46 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
You're right - it could have different lift rates or duration. But if I had to guess, I'd say they're probably the same.
Know what I'd do: head over to the teamswift.net forum and ask there. Someone may have a definitive answer.
|
|
|
|
|
12-21-2007, 12:23 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: montana
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
headed. I'll be back!
|
|
|
|
|
