01-23-2012, 04:16 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
PSmodder lurker
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chino
Posts: 1,605
Thanks: 26
Thanked 908 Times in 522 Posts
|
Zoom Zoom diesel
A more viable crossover to replace my present zoom zoom family bus. A handsome & distinctive sheetmetal sporting a Sky-D twin-stage turbo 4 cylinder with an available 6-speed manual transmission. Claims of 33/43 mpg economy from a non-hybrid crossover. Satisfying old school driving fun and decent pump avoidance numbers. Video Mazda CX5, Mazda Skyactiv D Turbo, vehiculo Mazda
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
01-23-2012, 04:33 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
|
Is this something available in the US now?
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
|
|
|
01-23-2012, 05:47 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
PSmodder lurker
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chino
Posts: 1,605
Thanks: 26
Thanked 908 Times in 522 Posts
|
Initial specs on lowering the compression ratio of the diesel engine may make it more difficult to warm up and in colder climes may mean improper combustion ~ misfires. There is a exhaust gas variable valve overlap system, heating up the next sequential cylinder with hotter gases but still waiting for cold weather testing.
SoCalifornians would love this but Minnesotans will have to wait for real world reviews.
|
|
|
01-24-2012, 03:19 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by botsapper
A more viable crossover to replace my present zoom zoom family bus. A handsome & distinctive sheetmetal sporting a Sky-D twin-stage turbo 4 cylinder with an available 6-speed manual transmission. Claims of 33/43 mpg economy from a non-hybrid crossover. Satisfying old school driving fun and decent pump avoidance numbers. Video Mazda CX5, Mazda Skyactiv D Turbo, vehiculo Mazda
|
The 2013 gasoline burning CX5 is rated 26/32 mpg.
2013 Mazda CX-5
The cheapest gasoline around here costs $3.34/gal and cheapest diesel costs $3.99/gal according to gasbuddy.
A gasoline fueled CX5 will cost $0.128/mile city and $0.104/mile highway
A diesel fueled CX5 will cost $0.121/mile city and $0.0927/mile highway.
Throw in the additional up front cost of the diesel engine and what are you left with? If you're going to pay extra for fuel economy, it might as well be a hybrid which would bump up city mileage substantially while burning cheaper gasoline.
|
|
|
01-24-2012, 02:16 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
PSmodder lurker
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chino
Posts: 1,605
Thanks: 26
Thanked 908 Times in 522 Posts
|
Throw in the additional up front cost of the diesel engine and what are you left with? If you're going to pay extra for fuel economy, it might as well be a hybrid which would bump up city mileage substantially while burning cheaper gasoline.[/QUOTE]
...by replacing the biggest zoom zoom school bus, CX-9, would be an improvement.
|
|
|
01-24-2012, 03:44 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
Does anyone know why they've been decreasing the CR of diesels in recent years? I'd figure you want a higher CR to increase efficiency.
|
|
|
01-24-2012, 03:59 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
PSmodder lurker
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chino
Posts: 1,605
Thanks: 26
Thanked 908 Times in 522 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox
Does anyone know why they've been decreasing the CR of diesels in recent years? I'd figure you want a higher CR to increase efficiency.
|
The trend to lower compression ratios (Mazda Sky-D, 14:1) is the convenient engineering solution to reduce temperatures = required lower NOx numbers. The observed fuel mix had less hot spots and locally rich areas that creates telltale exhaust soot. Mazda also claims the lesser compression also mitigate heat expansions thus less friction. Improvements and gains in fuel economy. Less internal stresses also let the engineers to make the crankshaft, rods & pistons much lighter for beneficial weight savings.
Again the lower operating temps mean some difficulty in colder climes.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to botsapper For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-24-2012, 05:11 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
...here in Tucson, AZ, the diesel-to-gasoline cost ratio is 1.28:1 [$4.059(d) / $3.179(g)], so in order for diesel to come out "ahead," it had better get 28% better fuel economy than its equivalent gasoline-powered counterpart...which means >51MPG!
...and, that's NOT considering any other cost "uppers" such as the higher "going-in" cost of the diesel engine versus the gasoline engine.
|
|
|
01-24-2012, 05:21 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 714
Thanks: 154
Thanked 272 Times in 166 Posts
|
Oddly enough, diesel used to be cheaper than gasoline, at least where I live.
|
|
|
|