Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-08-2009, 02:57 PM   #1 (permalink)
40MPG+ is my first goal
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 169

Green Dart - '96 88
90 day: 33.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
am i taking off too slow?

i try to keep vac above 10 inches but it feels like it just takes off better if i go down to about 4-5...anybody have any opinions or better yet, real numbers?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 03:44 PM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Quebec City
Posts: 1,377

The Truck (Retired) - '99 A3 Jetta TDI
90 day: 62.27 mpg (US)

The Guzzler - '08 Elantra GL
90 day: 32.95 mpg (US)

The Green Machine - '00 A4 Jetta TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
It does not matter much as long as you are able to get it to shift at the lowest rpm possible.
__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 04:08 PM   #3 (permalink)
marcusmodder
 
orange4boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 510

The Golden Egg - '93 Previa DX
90 day: 27.09 mpg (US)

marshmallow - '03 Prius
Thanks: 11
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
I've seen different numbers on this vacuum question. Some say 10 some lower like 6 or 7. The best P+G numbers are apparently at 75% throttle which is probably under 3.

I tested this on a couple of tanks. One where I throttled it up below 5 to speed then did steady state and the other where I "cat" footed up to speed at max 9 or 10 and there was only a small advantage to the "cat" footing. This was not a good enough test to see for sure but at least there wasn't a big difference.

Probably somewhere in between is good. I was surprised to see not much difference despite the "No jackrabbit starts" crap. As long as you are not wasting too much momentum, between 10 and 5 seems good.

I like to divide up the driving into

1) Create the kinetic energy efficiently under good BSFC and get up into the high gears fast.

2) Steady state and coast as much as possible.

Last edited by orange4boy; 09-08-2009 at 04:12 PM.. Reason: Because P***y cats are banned :(
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 02:07 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
wagonman76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northwest Lower Michigan
Posts: 856

Red Car - '89 Celebrity CL 4 door
Team Chevy
90 day: 35.91 mpg (US)

Winter Wagon - '89 6000 LE Wagon
90 day: 29.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
The worst place to be for FE is to be hanging just below where it would shift up. So in some cases it is better to get your speed up faster.
__________________

Winter daily driver, parked for the season, except used occassionally for junkyarding


Summer daily driver
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to wagonman76 For This Useful Post:
IsaacCarlson (09-10-2009)
Old 09-09-2009, 05:52 PM   #5 (permalink)
40MPG+ is my first goal
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 169

Green Dart - '96 88
90 day: 33.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
wish i had a SGII

might just have to settle for a TCC button and write EASY on it....
EASY BUTTON!!!!
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2009, 04:07 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: boise id
Posts: 42

Red Wrangler - '98 Wrangler Sport
90 day: 15.92 mpg (US)

Red Rocket - '94 GS500 E
90 day: 54.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I really haven't noticed my acceleration style making any difference in FE. Seems to get swamped in the other variables. I have got mileage improvements by focusing on deceleration. I'd say use what ever acceleration works best with the traffic flow and concentrate on using less braking unless you really need to break an FE record
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bombloader For This Useful Post:
IsaacCarlson (09-10-2009)
Old 09-10-2009, 10:18 PM   #7 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 8,658

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 78.84 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 106.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 68 Times in 49 Posts
bombloader and orange4boy raise good points: acceleration style, in the grand scheme of things is actually pretty insignificant compared to other driving techniques - like not wasting the momentum you've just created by heating up your brake pads right afterward.
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
IsaacCarlson (09-10-2009)
Old 09-10-2009, 11:06 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 284

Parachute - '03 Tracker LX
90 day: 28.55 mpg (US)

Peon - '95 Neon Highline baby!
90 day: 35.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by wagonman76 View Post
The worst place to be for FE is to be hanging just below where it would shift up. So in some cases it is better to get your speed up faster.
I'd agree for automatics, IMO the only good gear for FE is top gear with the converter locked, so I don't waste time getting there in my Neon. 1/3 to 1/2 throttle until 50mph then back off slightly so the converter locks is my technique. It also sometimes gives me some space from following traffic to glide without annoying people behind me.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2009, 11:35 PM   #9 (permalink)
marcusmodder
 
orange4boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 510

The Golden Egg - '93 Previa DX
90 day: 27.09 mpg (US)

marshmallow - '03 Prius
Thanks: 11
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
Where is the chart plotting the difference between mpg for varying degrees of acceleration? I have not found anything yet that shows this. I bet they cancel each other out to some extent.

Thinking out loud here and expanding on what MetroMPG said...

At the extremes of BSFC you have WOT and steady state cruise(SSC). The difference between these is where the meat of the gains (or tofu if you are vegetarian) is to be had in terms of FE. Hence the theory of P+G, where the pumping losses and engine friction losses from cruising are removed and replaced by short bursts of a more efficiently produced energy followed by coasting where aero and RR/bearing friction eat up the most of your energy.

When you accelerate from a stop, you are already producing energy much more efficiently than at SSC, like the pulse of a P+G. How much more efficiently seems to be not terribly important. Giver! Then coast all the way home.

The point is to preserve the momentum you have invested your acceleration into (by removing losses) and not create extra momentum to begin with. Slamming on the brakes can represent one of the biggest single losses of any one action. This is the subtle message left out of the "no jackrabbit starts" message. It should really read: Jack rabbit all you want, just don't waste the kinetic energy you've just created with your brakes.

1) Reduce parasitic losses
2) Don't waste momentum
3) highest gear, lowest speed.

As I write this I'm thinking about it and sorting these things out in my mind. It's not the easiest thing to express in a few words.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2009, 11:45 PM   #10 (permalink)
marcusmodder
 
orange4boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 510

The Golden Egg - '93 Previa DX
90 day: 27.09 mpg (US)

marshmallow - '03 Prius
Thanks: 11
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
don't waste time getting there in my Neon. 1/3 to 1/2 throttle until 50mph then back off slightly so the converter locks is my technique. It also sometimes gives me some space from following traffic to glide without annoying people behind me.
I like this as well because people expect you to crawl away from an intersection if you've just cut your engine to avoid idling.

I think the Jackrabbit BS was started to turn people off of improving their mileage. Who wants to crawl off the line and who wants to be behind them?
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help stop harassment of NEVs in WI, is Slow Moving Vehicle a way out? rmay635703 Fossil Fuel Free 11 09-09-2009 02:49 PM
Feb 25th - Int'l Slow Day Piwoslaw The Lounge 0 02-25-2009 03:12 AM
Green Slow Moving Vehicle bennelson General Efficiency Discussion 3 07-27-2008 10:58 AM
Slow Speed Issues and an Auto Tranny Bobsterz Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 4 06-28-2008 11:10 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com