Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-01-2008, 09:45 AM   #1 (permalink)
lyd
It smells funny in here.
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern Wisconsin
Posts: 63

GeeOh - '97 Geo Metro Base
90 day: 33.41 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Anything wrong with filling up into the tank neck?

Heh. Can't seem to phrase that quite right. How many of you read that subject and thought, "well, where else would you put it?"

What I mean is, adding fuel until the level rises up into the neck. I vaguely remember having once read that this was bad practice, but I can't remember why and googling on the topic just now didn't enlighten me.

The reason I want to do this is that between the notoriously inaccurate Geo gas gauge (Just yesterday I found out I have a 10 gallon tank! For years I've thought it was 8 gal because that's what it takes when the needle is solidly at the bottom of the red.) causing me to fill up early, the tendency for any pump to kick off unpredictably when filling this car, and a small tank size in any case, the percentage variance between one fill and the next can be so high. In order to try to be more consistent I've started, with the last fill, continuing to pump gas into it until I hear it come right up into the tank neck. Seems like that should help get the variance down to a reasonable margin. I've been doing the same pump, same direction thing all along, of course.

Any trouble with this?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-01-2008, 11:03 AM   #2 (permalink)
EV OR DIESEL
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 1,758

FarFarfrumpumpen - '03 Volkswagen Jetta Wagon GLS Premium

Quorra - '12 Tesla Model S P85
Thanks: 57
Thanked 113 Times in 86 Posts
Send a message via AIM to dremd
it will very likley kill your evaporative emissions canister, that is if you have one; otherwise you will dump fuel either on the ground or down your intake.

Us diesel guys do it; but diesel doesn't evaporate nearly as easily.
__________________
2016 Tesla Model X
2022 Sprinter
Gone 2012 Tesla Model S P85
Gone 2013 Nissan LEAF SV
2012 Nissan LEAF SV
6 speed ALH TDI Swapped in to a 2003 Jetta Wagon
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 11:45 AM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Olympia, wa
Posts: 96

Red Beast - '82 Honda V45 Sabre Vetter Fairing
90 day: 39.38 mpg (US)

The Wife's bike - '82 Honda CM450E Red
90 day: 57.22 mpg (US)

Yellow Submarine - '04 Dodge Neon SXT
90 day: 28.71 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
dont forget thermal expansion in the summer. Dremd is right abuot your emissions system if you are filling up to the throat. if you are just filling to the base of the fill tube, you should be ok.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 12:24 PM   #4 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,960 Times in 3,604 Posts
I've been in the practice of doing this (filling to the top of the filler neck) since day 1. Not aware of any adverse effects.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 12:51 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
wagonman76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northwest Lower Michigan
Posts: 1,006

Red Car - '89 Chevrolet Celebrity CL 4 door
Team Chevy
90 day: 36.47 mpg (US)

Winter Wagon - '89 Pontiac 6000 LE Wagon
90 day: 28.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 17 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ac7ss View Post
dont forget thermal expansion in the summer. Dremd is right abuot your emissions system if you are filling up to the throat. if you are just filling to the base of the fill tube, you should be ok.
Thats the main reason I dont do that, I would worry about losing gas due to expansion. Not only summer, but I would think that the expansion from -20F to 20F would be the same as 50F to 90F.

To try to minimize the difference between pump shutoffs, I count seconds to myself and pump at about .1 gallon per second. And I go to the 2nd clickoff. The only time I get a bad fill is when the pump is broken and the shutoff doesnt work and it overfills. Also, before even getting out of the car, I make an educated guess of what itll take to fill the tank to start with, so if it kicks off way too soon or not at all, I know somethings up. Also if the car is on a slope, itll affect the fill a bit depending on where your fill tube enters the tank.
__________________

Winter daily driver, parked most days right now


Summer daily driver
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 06:00 PM   #6 (permalink)
lyd
It smells funny in here.
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern Wisconsin
Posts: 63

GeeOh - '97 Geo Metro Base
90 day: 33.41 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hmm. Regarding expansion, if I just make sure to fill up on the way out to drive rather than on the way home to park, does that pretty much solve it? Even with the Metro's mileage, it can't take long to burn through that bit of gas.

The canister problem I don't understand. Could someone expand on how this could kill it? I don't understand the dumping fuel into the intake comment either.

There is some possibility my canister might be dead anyway. I read a comment recently that suggested that with a functioning canister your tank won't ever go psssshhhhht when you take the cap off, and mine does sometimes.

I won't have as much of an issue with this once I have settled into a routine and am more concerned about averaging over several tanks anyway, but right now I am trying to get some good baseline data as soon as I can.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 06:10 PM   #7 (permalink)
EV OR DIESEL
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 1,758

FarFarfrumpumpen - '03 Volkswagen Jetta Wagon GLS Premium

Quorra - '12 Tesla Model S P85
Thanks: 57
Thanked 113 Times in 86 Posts
Send a message via AIM to dremd
Quote:
Originally Posted by lyd View Post
Hmm. Regarding expansion, if I just make sure to fill up on the way out to drive rather than on the way home to park, does that pretty much solve it? Even with the Metro's mileage, it can't take long to burn through that bit of gas.
You are probably correct, but that would depend on the necks shape

Quote:
Originally Posted by lyd View Post
The canister problem I don't understand. Could someone expand on how this could kill it?
Sure thing

Essentially the evaporative emmissions canister is a charcol filter designed to catch fuel vapors esc aping from your tank, collect them, then release them in to your intake manifold to be used as fuel when you strart the car.

Issue is that they are designed to work with gas/ vapors (the state of matter) if they receive liquid fuel (at least in the case of my 87 supra) the charcoal turns in to mush and no longer does its job.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lyd View Post
I don't understand the dumping fuel into the intake comment either.
If your car doesn't have an evaporative emissions canister, then chances are the vent line goes straight to the intake (air cooled vw did this) If i filed it all the way up I'd get surging while cornering left due to the liquid fuel being poured down the carburetors throat.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lyd View Post
There is some possibility my canister might be dead anyway. I read a comment recently that suggested that with a functioning canister your tank won't ever go psssshhhhht when you take the cap off, and mine does sometimes.
Going t ask someone else that one.
__________________
2016 Tesla Model X
2022 Sprinter
Gone 2012 Tesla Model S P85
Gone 2013 Nissan LEAF SV
2012 Nissan LEAF SV
6 speed ALH TDI Swapped in to a 2003 Jetta Wagon
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 06:31 PM   #8 (permalink)
lyd
It smells funny in here.
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern Wisconsin
Posts: 63

GeeOh - '97 Geo Metro Base
90 day: 33.41 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks a lot for the reply. I see what you mean about the canister.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Filling the tank with repeatabilty wagonman76 Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 26 03-09-2011 03:47 PM
Filling Up Full Tank Adds Unnecessary Weight Thus Reduces Mpg. dsq EcoModding Central 54 02-22-2011 04:33 PM
is it true that a full tank gives better mileage? gasti_ako General Efficiency Discussion 48 10-09-2008 06:47 AM
2 Tank Averages - Anybody else use them? moorecomp Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 8 10-02-2008 07:38 AM
Smaller Fuel Tank steensn EcoModding Central 5 07-11-2008 01:09 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com